10 Things to Learn from a Beginner.

Submitted by LuigiBotha on Mon, 11/05/2007 at 2:50am.

  What can I say after playing my first 50 games?  Like many people I learn chess from a Parent and mostly played my siblings and the odd game here and there with friends and on computer software. I could always handle myself well. I was introduced to on line chess by a friend and it awakened my love for the game again after many many years of not playing any games. I basically started as a beginner although not a complete novice and re discovered chess again.  In this short article I share with you my “The GO!master’s 10 truths or sometimes falsehoods of chess. ” after playing my first 50 games on chess.com.  

 1                    Don’t re invent the (chess) wheel. There is no opening that in future will bear your name.  It pays to study the well known openings and defenses, you start with a huge disadvantage against a weak player that at least have some opening moves learnt. After my first 15 games 8 won and 7 lost I realised that if I want to up my game it is time to google some basic chess openings and do some research.  

2                    Basic chess theory are true, sometimes. Those “ten basic chess strategies for beginners” you know those like don’t move a piece twice in an opening, don’t bring out your Queen early or Castle early in the game etc. In the beginning I applied these rules rigidly without properly understanding the principles underlying these tips fully. I sometimes castle when I shouldn’t and doing so lost the tempo advantage that I had or kept my Queen out of the game untill I had no more use for her anyway. What I realised about chess theory is that it is a theory and not science. Chess is much too complicated yet simple If chess theory could be developed to the level that we all known everything about chess, would all games end in draws? The same for the 10 rules in this article, they are sometimes not true. 

3                    You will blunder, beware. Grand masters also blunders. I used to get so unsettled with my blunders that I lost interest in the game and eventually lost. After a series of losses and early resignations I realised that this way I will never win a game nor even see any endgame play. Learn to handle blunders. 

4                    Don’t be afraid of chess. As my interest into the game developed I started reading a bit on chess and reviewed some famous Grandmaster games. I was surprised at the grandmaster moves. In essence it was the same moves we all make the same openings available to anyone. I realised that chess is basically simple yet complex. Chess is not a mystery for prodigies only. My ability is not a fixed state, but I can learn , developed and become a better player. This realisation is what inspired me to take my chess playing to the next level and make it a life long interest. Here on line I will have opponents and it can become a bigger interest in my life. 

5                    Play with body and mind.  If you want to win then play when you are alert and able to apply your mind to the game. I made my biggest blunders playing in the early morning hours when I couldn’t keep an eye open or I logged on after a night out with friends and the inevitable couple of beers. 

 6                    Have plan B ready. Don’t invest everything into one strategy, if the strategy don’t pull off then be ready to switch to another . In some of the games I played I saw that I am throwing all my pieces at a plan. Sometimes the plan failed but then I have no options left. I sacrificed most of my pawns that I need now for plan B for promotion. Other times I have driven myself into a corner at the far end of the board and am unable to lauch an attack to where my opponent has escaped to.  

7                    Consider the endgame at the start of the game. I perhaps sometimes went through the motions of the opening and thoughlessly played the middle game. Only to realised that my game is deprived of style and command. I have been commanding my pieces around the board in a series of battles but I was not leading them to victory. I sometimes now tell myself before the game ‘s first move how I want to play the game, aggressive and open or defensive and close, waiting or developing.  

8                    There are no cheaters only fools. Cheaters only exist in the virtual world, don’t worry about them treat them as virtual. Early on I bacame concerned about the possibility of playing against cheaters and some player’s profiles and behaviuor made me very suspicious. I realised that the easiest way of handling it is not to worry about it. If I was busy making moves against Fritz 10 then only me was benefitted even from losing the game. Eventually you will play face to face with somebody and if you then claim to have a rating of 2600 I hope you’ll be able to beat that 1200 beginner. Getting stuck for a good move and then using a chess engine is just a lazy option and you will not learn and it is still cheating. Understand the rating system and use your rating as a measurement of your progress. Don’t let it be your goal it means officially nothing outside chess.com.

9                    You have an opponent. This might sound obvious but especially with on line chess one can become a bit self absorbed. Your opponent is also playing don’t forget about him or her. Sometimes you get so involved with your strategy and percieve your opponent’s moves to be only in reponse to your’s that you fail to see his grand plan unfolding. Many games that I really sat down with and analysed to 4, 5 6 moves deep made me so sure of my plan that I fail to even see the simplest threats only one or two moves away from me being checkmate. Once I was still waiting for my opponent to come online to make my first move in a four move checkmate plan only to see I was checkmated and the game allready in archives.

10                To develop your game you have to try new things.If you lose, it is only a game. After my 45 th game I realised that if I am going to continue playing the Ruy lopez and and be prudent playing only safe moves that I am comfortably with I will not develop further. My next game I made bold moves and exchange my queen very early. Thereby I gained the tempo and consequent advantage of the game possibly totally unsettling the opponent with the unconventional play. I won. Now I understood that a style of play , aggressive, bold sometimes defensive sometimes reflective of your mood has a major bearing on the outcome of a game.

11                You are good when you win 50% of your games. When you win more than 50% games then you won a lot of games you’re not necessarily a better player. Grandmasters don’t win all their games they draw and lose some in tournaments.  To enjoy the game (Which I suppose should be the object of playing it in the first place) I would rather play opponents at my level strength and have an enjoyable experience. Where I lose some games but I know I can play good enough to win a re match. If I win 100% all my games, I must be either a Grandmaster or all my opponents were weaker than me. Neither do I want to lose all my games. If I start to win more than 50-60% of my games then I will up my level of opponents. If I consistently beat on average 1400 players then I will move to 1450 , 1500 etc. After 54 games my rating is 1400 and my average opponents are +- 1400 My percentage wins are 50%. I am having fun.


» posted in Strategy
 

Comments:

by figrock - 13 months ago
United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 1438

Good article..! Very sound advice..!

by Maradonna - 21 months ago
Scotland
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 2145

Looking at part nine made me laugh because I just fell for that. In a game I'm playing, I saw the possibility of a draw or a win after some deep (well for me) analysis, and my opponent played a move I didn't ever know exsisted-doh! Got to keep thinking of all possibilities, people do not think the same as me.

 


by dbalanza2 - 23 months ago
La Paz Bolivia
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 141

I liked your article a lot, I just have to disagree about learning the openings first, or understanding them.

I believe you have to learn the endgame first and then improve your openings, if you don't know how to checkmate then you'll never win, no matter how well your openings are.

I'll also read your latest article.  


by LuigiBotha - 2 years ago
East London South Africa
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 77
Read my latest article "chess and the art of motorcycle maintenance"
by Brummer27 - 2 years ago
Waitakere New Zealand
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 10

Thanks for the article...great comments too.

 I'm in same boat for trying to gauge how much I should study openings vs just trying to play the position best I can, with moves that I think are good.  hopefully over time I will realize what makes more sense in more and more situations.

Agree that the whole point of the game is to learn to have fun...playing the moves I think are best at the time, then analysing the outcome after the game is done has helped me out.

 Cheers

by fozzwaldusmaximus - 2 years ago
Dublin Ireland
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 85
True true very true.
by LuigiBotha - 2 years ago
East London South Africa
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 77

 

Thank you for all the  comments so far.

Zenchess is correct. In my case I think I did not understand openings well enough. I found myself not really knowing where I am going with my standard opening moves e4,Nf3,Nc3 . I could also not respond well enough.

After I started reading a bit about chess (where to start ? The openings was the obvious choice) my understanding of the opening game improve and I played with more self confidence. Before I would pour for long over the board, helpless after the first two moves ,what next.

I agree fully that chess openings are not a step by step guide to victory , that is just impossible. I was more lost knowing my famous three opening moves but not understanding them.

On point 7. I think after I gained confidence in the game I could see and understand that chess is not a one dimensional strategy game and that multi strategies can be applied. I


by Zenchess - 2 years ago
Omaha United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 391

1: Don't reinvent the chess wheel

 

"There is no opening that in the future will bear your name"

That is probably true, unless you become a famous player and popularize a certain opening variation.  In actuality new opening names come about all the time.  The names of openings are not fixed and new variations come about all the time.

 "It pays to study the well known openings and defenses, you start with a huge disadvantage against a weak player that at least have some opening moves learnt"

I have to disagree with this.  Who wins will not come about because someone knew 2 more opening moves than you.  Every opening has countless deviations from the main lines.  The person who is really going to have an advantage is the person who understands the opening, which does not require memorizing countless variations.  I know strong players who can play an opening they've never seen or studied before, because they understand the principles of chess, and they can play any position based on that understanding.  Almost all strong chess players, from the beginning of chess history, have advised against beginners or even medium level players spending tons of time memorizing openings.  To become stronger, you need to learn principles of chess, strategy, tactics, and understanding.  Not just move orders.  You may learn 13 moves of the sicilian najdorf, but when your opponent deviates, and you fall apart in 2 moves after that, has it really helped you?

 

7: "I sometimes now tell myself before the game ‘s first move how I want to play the game, aggressive and open or defensive and close, waiting or developing.  "

    While at certain parts of the game, you can guide the game towards these waters, if you try to apply a strategy to a position that does not support it, you are not playing according to the position.  If you decide that you're going to play 'defensive' the entire game, and the game opens up and your opponents king is weak, it would be a mistake to continue playing 'defensively' when the position is calling for active play.  Let the position dictate how to play, not your emotions.

 

 

 


by KingFork - 2 years ago
Chicago, IL United States
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 148

Thanks for the upbeat perspective.  Everyone struggles after getting trapped or making a stupid move that they just go and make another stupid move.  Mistakes come in bunches.  In poker, they call it be "on tilt".

 I think I need to go study some openings now... Laughing

 


by mxdplay4 - 2 years ago
mids UK England
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 707
This guy has exactly the right attitude. Good on him.
by eZee - 2 years ago
United Kingdom United Kingdom
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 1
Nicely written - very encouraging!
by Fellippo - 2 years ago
Zlín Czech Republic
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 556
Great! These are really good points. Thank you.
 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.