^ Click here to remove ads! ^

A Chess Emergency

Submitted by cldng on Sat, 02/02/2008 at 4:24am.

   A Chess Emergency

  By NM Steve Colding

 

I recently was asked by  a member to comment on his blog. I did and since I feel it might help a little I submit it for your approval.Below is dronstar's blog:

On getting better and GMs

Submitted by dronestar on Fri, 02/01/2008 at 9:16pm.

While I took a couple of weeks off to deal with a medical issue with my girl friend I got a couple off chess books to study and hopefully get a better understanding of the what I consider to be the higher concepts of chess.

Then I realized something reading the first couple of pages of an book on openings, specifically a paragraph that went through the opening moves that went through a progression of moves in that every move made a new opening.(I won't go through the moves for fear of copy right infringements) but basically move one was the Sicilion defense and into the Dragon variation and into the Yugoslav attack and finally into the CHINESE VARIATION OF THE DRAGON SICILION. This was done in one game.(hopefully people with a lot of chess knowledge will understand this if not its the book Mastering the chess Openings by John Watson.)

Reading this made me realize something. EVERY MOVE I MAKE OR THINK TO MAKE AND EVERY TACTIC HAS ALREADY BEEN DONE. I seriously thought about giving up chess! But why you might ask? Because the whole idea is to get better at this game and the one revelation is that for every move or tactic I try theres a counter, Then thinking about GMs and such and getting better, I thought its not so much that I am getting better but that I would know more about the moves and counter moves to the knowledge my opponent would have.

The point being is getting better at chess a matter of having a big enough book of moves and counter moves or is it a matter of recognition and understanding.

The last thing I would say is that I've never looked at GM level games but to me at the upper tiers of chess it seems like there would be a lot of draws.

Your thoughts on this would be appreciated.

  This was my answer:

     To Dronestar,

     Yes  dronstar, at first when you look at the opening and the sub-openings and their counters it looks very daunting indeed.   Your arguments, though valid speaks of despair and if true chess would be a good game. There is reason to hope.

      Here is where you arguments fall short:

  1.      Computers have discovered that the average game of chess should be about 6.000 moves! Now the average game of chess is only about 40. Which means we are all babies as far as chess is concerned.
  2.      Although there are many openings that go 40 moves into analysis there are also openings that have yet to be discovered or explored.
  3.      Over my 40 years of playing chess I have discovered that it is not the opening that matters but how you play it!
  4.      Computers who think three billion moves a second(!)did not solve chess.
  5.      That the average of winning in the middle-game is 20%, the endgame is 60%, and in the opening only 20%!

      So don't put so much emphasis on the opening, you only win in it 20% of the time. Theres  a further 80%  you should concentrate on. Capablanca said study the ending first and statisctics prove the soundness of his theorem.

     Here's a few hints on how to play the opening and avoid all those reems of analysis:

  1.      The objective of the opening is to get to a playable middle-game.
  2.      Develop your pieces quickly.
  3.      Don't block your pieces.
  4.      Keep your eyes on the center. Control at least one square in the center.
  5.      Don't move Pawns uneccesarily.
  6.      Dont Pawn hunt.
  7.      Play moves you understand, memory always fails but understanding lasts a lifetime.
  8.    Study openings which limit your opponents responses like the Bird's Opening.
  9.    Play openings which you like!

     There are many more tips but the idea is just to play good sensible moves and you will get out of the opening with a good position. There is one more thing do you think even grandmasters know all the moves in those books?   

     We are all explorers in chess and if you are diligent and enjoy yourself maaybe you too will eventually have a variation named after you. Our game is too rich to try to learn everything specialise!

     The most important thing you should remember is that chess should be fun! Put down those stuffy, dusty manuals, and just play! Birds fly, fish swim, and men contemplate. When you play chess you do what men were to do and that is where the joy should come from.

      Sincerely Steve


» posted in Opening Theory
« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Comments:

by grimreaper1973 - 5 months ago
Albany NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 80
Wow.  Lots of food for thought here for a newbie.  It does give me some hope as I was recently despairing a lack of a "strong" opening.  Seems like a balanced diet is required here...well, if after hating yogurt for 34 years i can eat it...I guess I can try learning more about middle and end game and not focusing entirely on beginning...thanks all for giving me some hope! :)
by PhilipN - 5 months ago
Oregon United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 140

Capablanca was frustrated by the fact that it seemed to him like the game of chess had been played out-he was, I've heard, a proponent of Archbishop Chess, in which each player starts out with a 9th piece, the Archbishop, which can move like a bishop or a knight.  Then there's Seirawan Chess and four-way chess (not for those who kick themselves too hard over their blunders-the complexity of a four-way board position is incredible compared with regular chess).  But if your opponent knows his opening book better than you do, you can always shake things up a bit by intentionally leaving the opening sequence with an unusual move (as long as it's not an obviously weak one-no Cornstalk Defense here!).  Even if your move is inferior to the book move, your opponent might not have studied how to reply to it.  I, for one, believe that Lasker's Excuse ("I made an inferior move because it was harder to counter than the 'best' move!") was more than an excuse.

I liked Darkmage's analogy about music-I myself enjoy playing and composing music and I think that chess is similar in the way that Darkmage referred to.


by NM cldng - 5 months ago
Brooklyn, New York United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 229
To Englishchessplay, I am a Life master and have an elo of 2215.
by EnGliSHCheSsPlAy - 5 months ago
Italy Italy
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 287
what grade are you?Wink
by frank713 - 5 months ago
Kaneohe, Hawaii United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 85

Humans created computers and the programs that run them, have not heard of a computer program that programs it self or built its self without humans! Although I heard this come happen in the future!  Humans adapt, and enjoy chess and life with all its ups and downs!

If we really want to improve our chess games we will find a way and computers can assist in this area as they keep a vast amount of data and can easily bring to our attention. We may not become master's of chess, but it sure will be fun trying! Its only a game and great way of exercising our thinking process! Who knows what we we may come up with next. Of course there is the game of Go that its been around fro about 4500 years while chess 1500 (see www.usgo.org) , and in the current format a little over 500 years (see www.uschess.org) , Go has not changed much although each country has its variant rules and then there is the International Ing rules. Anyway chess is still my game, although Go comes in a strong second and that may change in time too! I'm only human! " NM Edward Lasker in 1930's wrote: founder of AGA if I had learn Go first chess would have stood no chance!"


by chopra - 5 months ago
venezuela Venezuela
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 93
Chess is one of the best things that I have got in my life. Now I have more time from myself because I am retired from the University, not completely, I still give some conferences at postgraduate students and most of the time I work at my private practice(I'm a Doctor)(a Gynecologist and endocrinologist), I don't receive more than 10 patients a day a most of my emergencies are attended for my daugther who now helps me a lot, so I'm plenty of time and I love doing 3 things: playing piano for relax, reading a good book and playing chess! (of course I dedicate time to my family), so I play chess every day and I enjoy it very much because if you know the basic principles of opening you can do a pretty good middle game where you can develop all you creativity(it is very important to play when you have time to concentrate as much as you can), always try to find "the best move" because there are always "good moves" but there is always "a best move" you just be patient and you will see it, at least try to make the "less bad move", well that's my advice and I hope you enjoy this great thing that is playing chess!!
by mytself - 5 months ago
youngstown,ohio United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 241
     I agree, chess is a way to develop thinking processes. Exploring new lines of development has no meaning unless there is a way to see where it is going. Some people visualize interconnecting lines of attack. Others see applied and implied pressures. If you think that sacrificing two pawns during the opening will gain you a positional advantage, then try it. The book will tell you, you are two pawns down. The board tells you that your opponent is constrained. Trading a rook for a knight and two pawns, or a rook and pawn for a bishop and knight. Each depends on the fluidity of the moment. Explore, enjoy how much trouble you can get in and out of by trying new concepts. A step by step, move, countermove, will advance you up the ranks. It will not however develope your appreciation for the complexities of the game.
by Kingfisher - 5 months ago
zagreb Croatia
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 1104
6000 moves? How would they avoid the 50 move rule?
by ritz4747 - 5 months ago
Tagum City Philippines
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 1

Chess is a science and perfect mathematics. However, to find a mathematical solution that could always lead to a draw is next to imposible. In any other way around, Chess is an Art. Just play it and enjoy.
by Darkmage - 5 months ago
United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 27

Saying every tactic has been used before in chess, therefore give it up, is a bit like saying every chord has been played before, so why listen to music? The joy comes from using those tactics in new and surprising ways. And this is something computers cannot do--they can only calculate. They can hammer you into the ground, yes, but they don't *think*. Eventually you'll learn to beat them.

 

Humans learn from their mistakes and they're a lot more fun to play against.


by Chessroshi - 5 months ago
Indianapolis United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 159
When I am studying chess, I try to keep in my head what I like to call the great "WHY?".  I want to know the mechanics of the game and know why something is good or why a player is winning. It's like Fischer said, "Ideas, never moves". So learn your fundamentals, find out how to win a chess game, and then think of each move in relation to the ultimate goal, which is to checkmate the king. The king is checkmated when he is attacked with more force than he is defended with. The purpose of the whole game is to create this imbalance in force and strike the deathblow. There is nothing more than this! (Unfortunately for hacks like me, learning how to create this imbalance is a long lesson, most of our lives ;)  ).
by Chessroshi - 5 months ago
Indianapolis United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 159
If I were this chap, I wouldn't worry so much about perfection and trodding in the well-worn path. We are humans, and are apt to folly. Chess should be something that is enjoyed for it's own sake. If we focus on who is better than us, or who has gone before us, then we shall sit like stone statues! In life, as in chess, there will ALWAYS be someone who is more skilled. Strive to beat your current level, strive to grow and appreciate this great game of ours. You will discover more about the game and yourself in this manner.
by Zenchess - 5 months ago
Omaha United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 214

"The average game of chess is 6000 moves"

 

While that may be true, I don't think it's relevant.  You didn't say the average 'well played' game of chess.  There are many uncountable (except by mathemeticians) games of chess that can be played by mindlessly moving pieces back and forth.  If you count these pointless games in the average move count, then you will increase the 'average' drastically.  

 

 


by NM cldng - 5 months ago
Brooklyn, New York United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 229
to the curator, thanks for the correction! You guys sure do keep me honest!
by thecurator - 5 months ago
Sunshine Coast Canada
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 3
Correction:  John Nunn's book is Secrets of Practical Chess, not Secrets of Practical Play
by thecurator - 5 months ago
Sunshine Coast Canada
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 3
A British chess-writer once said something about playing the opening like a grandmaster and the rest of the game like a gorilla!  If you waste too much time studying the openings, you can count on a lifetime of inconsistent results.  Once you're familiar with the basic principles of opening play and have learned a few lines in the popular gambits, it's time to work on your understanding, as Steve pointed out.  Can you answer a question like this? - "Once the opening phase is over, how does the pawn structure and piece placement dictate the further course of play?"  If you can't, a book like Silman's Reassess Your Chess (with accompanying workbook) might be a good way to go.  Silman's method has its critics, but it's an excellent way to learn to think for yourself in chess (and what to think about).  I think one difficulty when you're starting out is getting used to winning in the opening against players who know next to nothing, usually threatening a fundamental tactic that your opponent overlooks.  This can develop a bad habit of expecting to win in the opening, leading to frustration against stronger players.  As Steve pointed out, the primary purpose of the opening is to get into a playable middlegame.  By the way, John Nunn's book, Secrets of Practical Play, offers some excellent advice about choosing and studying openings.  Now, here's a point about studying the endgame.  You're studying an opening variation, and suddenly you ask yourself, "If White plays that, why can't Black play this?  It loos good to me, but this opening book doesn't even mention that move.  damn, damn, damn!"  The reason Black can't play that move is because it creates a static endgame disadvantage, allowing White to exchange down into an endgame and attempt to exploit this advantage.  (I'm oversimpliflying, of course, due to the whole issue with the isolani, a crucial aspect of chess theory.)  When you're forced to stay in the middlegame because an endgame would be disadvantageous, your choices become very limited.   Why isn't this mentioned in your opening book? Because it's not a book on endgames.  So, not only does studying the endgame improve your playing strength in endgames, it also helps you to understand why certain opening moves are played or avoided.  And if someone else has already played your brilliant combination - so what?  Is going to Paris less fun because others have already been there?
 
by kolechess - 5 months ago
Somewhere Australia
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 242
I still feel the final matrix was a rip off the machines didnt really give in it was a draw and also now they got learning computers so they probably discover it before us and all great lines be named after them imagine thefritz100 sicilian gambit or the shredder 9000 motherboard attack one day it will happen they are superior as soon as they get personality we stuffed.
by 8by8 - 5 months ago
Tucson United States
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 114

Let chess be fun and rewarding as a learning experience. Use it as an excersie of the mind, to deepen focus and concentration. The path on the journey to the results you want is the valued experience that in itself will lead to positive results. I other words, focus upon the means and the ends will come.

Even grandmasters lose, and take from said experiences lessons about chess and themselves. This is why top players will rebound and maintain their status. They roll with the punches and take lessons into their next game

All types of variation of my favorite opening D4 have been played, but I try to pit myself against players, to learn to better my play and to think with a better view of stratedgy.

Relax and enjoy playing.


by Unbeliever - 5 months ago
United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 1083
Hmm... Opening study does not seem so daunting anymore!
by SK-B - 5 months ago
Brattleboro, VT United States
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 134

There is an alive feeling about playing with another person, compared with playing with against a computer. Somehow chess is more than a mathematically calculated series of permutations.


« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.