Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

A Chess Story

  • GM BryanSmith
  • | Oct 4, 2012
  • | 13362 views
  • | 30 comments

There is a funny thing about chess: to succeed, you only need to be good at it. Up to a point, Fate can turn its back on you, but you can override it by simply playing really well. The upshot is that in the chess world, there are some great players who did not have fate on their sides. 

I have often thought about the story of Carl Schlecter, who played a match for the world championship with Emanuel Lasker in 1910. Leading by one point before the final game, he lost the game – despite having a promising position and avoiding many draws. It's never been clear what the conditions for the match were - did he need +2 to win the match, and thus was in a must-win situation in the last game? Or did he only need a draw? If he had drawn the game (thus finishing the match with +1), he might have been seen having a “moral” claim to the world championship, even if the match conditions left the official title in Lasker’s hands. Here was the key position:

Instead Lasker won, tied the match and kept the title of World Champion. Eight years later, during World War One, Carl Schlecter died of starvation. Would that have happened if he hadn't played 35...Rxf4 in that fateful game?

Another story is that of the American Harry Nelson Pillsbury. An incredible talent, Pillsbury shot to fame during the Hastings 1895 tournament. Before the tournament he was a complete unknown, but he won the greatest tournament that had ever been held, and instantly became a world championship contender. In those days it was not easy to make a living as a chess professional – even for the top players. In order to do so, he played blindfold exhibitions on multiple boards throughout the world. Sometimes he also played checkers and whist. During these exhibitions he thrilled everybody with his personality and wit. He seemed like somebody who could conquer the world.

But his career didn’t last too long. In the next great tournament, St. Petersburg 1896, which was created to find out once and for all who the best player was (among Lasker, Steinitz, Pillsbury, and Chigorin), he lost a critical game to the World Champion Emanuel Lasker. Pillsbury missed some chances and Lasker won a magical brilliancy.

Pillsbury had started the tournament very well, and it had seemed that he would repeat the triumph at Hastings. But this game marked the dividing line – after it, he only scored 1.5 points from the last eight. Although he remained a great player, he never reached the level he had in 1895. His health began to deteriorate, and he died only nine years later, of syphilis. While the disease certainly caused his death, nervous conditions surely hastened the progression of a disease that is not necessarily deadly so soon. 

And yet Pillsbury never forgot that fateful game. He found an improvement and waited years to use it. In the last year of his life, he once again faced Emanuel Lasker – and again Lasker used the same variation. Pillsbury won a beautiful game.



Comments


  • 2 years ago

    xxDarthVaderxx

    great battle

  • 2 years ago

    ksbalan04

    A great battle with a winning aspiration.

  • 2 years ago

    M8IN3

    Chess is a lot like golf ---- it completely reveals the Psyche of an individual.  No team to hide behind...no team to draw inspiration upon -- it is just you ....and your moves reveal your strengths/weaknesses, fears and aspirations.    .....like I say on the golf course and across the board ...'Tis a cruel game

  • 2 years ago

    nyLsel

    Poor thing, he doesn't move the one that will lead unto draw.

  • 2 years ago

    dinkir9

    Chess is really psychological, thats why I think Magnus is so good, he doesn't look at his opponents. He just kinda wanders his eyes around trying not to think of whos on the other side of the board, he doesn't wanna be scared of them.

  • 2 years ago

    MrProfit

    Great article! It's a shame that both Schlecter and Pillsbury died so young as I am sure they could have contributed much more to the world of chess.

    ChessWorldThe Free Dictionary: ChessWorld is a correspondence chess server hosted by the Barnet Chess Club in England and with over 400,000 members in more than two hundred countries.

  • 2 years ago

    ewuenhob

    really nice ancient games! Love that romantic style!

    Maybe there also was a modern case of psychological problems after a world championchip. In my opinion Leko also did suffer after his loss in the last round (leading one point just needing a draw) versus Kramnik... this game was really exciting...


    Thanks a lot for this article!

  • 2 years ago

    lanpirot87

    Nice article with astonishing attacking games! Thank you! Just a note: it's Carl Schlec_H_ter

Back to Top

Post your reply: