A Fischer Brief

Submitted by NM GreenLaser on Sat, 05/23/2009 at 6:59pm.

Robert James Fischer was born March 9, 1943 and died January 17, 2008. He learned how to play chess at the age of six. At seven, he began to play in clubs and have instructors. In 1956, at 13, which is the record, he won the United States Junior Championship. He also won in 1957. After winning the U.S. Open and the New Jersey Open, he won the U.S. Championship. He won that event every time he played in it, eight times. In the 1963-64 championship, he scored 11-0. This was the only perfect score ever obtained in the championship. At the Portoroz Interzonal of 1958, Fischer became the youngest person to qualify for the Candidates (then a tournament) and the youngest to become a grandmaster. Those records were broken decades later. He won the Stockholm Interzonal of 1962. In 1963, he won the New York State Championship. Fischer was clearly winning the Sousse Interzonal in 1967 (8.5/10), but withdrew. In the USSR-Rest of the World match, Fischer beat Tigran Petrosian, the 9th world champion, 3-1. The World Championship of Lightning Chess, though an unofficial 5 minute contest, was impressively won by Fischer with a score of 19 out of 22 and a 4.5 point lead over Tal in second place. In his next events he won without any losses. Fischer won the Palma de Mallorca Interzonal of 1970 (18.5/23) with one loss. Fischer then went on to dominate his opponents in three 1971 candidates matches, defeating Mark Taimanov 6-0, Bent Larsen 6-0, and Tigran Petrosian 6.5-2.5. In 1972, he defeated Boris Spassky 12.5-8.5 to become world champion. He refused to defend the title three years later. Anatoly Karpov was the beneficiary of this default and perhaps, in a way, the victim, due to losing his chance to compete against Fischer. Maybe Fischer would have "broken" Karpov so that he never could have become champion, or perhaps, Karpov would have grown strong enough, even in losing, so that he could have won the title from Fischer in 1978. Later, Kasparov became stronger after playing many games against Karpov. Karpov did not have that opportunity against Fischer, who never played chess seriously again, unless his rematch with Spassky in 1992 is counted. The following game was selected because it is interesting and not among Fischer's best known. He is playing against the Dragon, against which he regarded White's strategy as sac, sac, mate. When this game was played, Fischer did not know his opponent and did not even get his name. All I know is that the gentleman played in seven Olympiads for Mongolia from 1962-74 and had a score of 15.5 out of 38.

» posted in Chess Players
 

Comments:

by NM GreenLaser - 49 days ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1406

1wa, Fischer dropped out of high school at the age of 16 in 1959. He would have been due to graduate in 1960. He already knew that he wanted to play chess or "work" chess. He reached the level of world champion and raised the level of financial rewards for a chess player. However, his personality with its maladjustments and stubborness, which served the ends of the previous sentence, did not permit him to make the living he could have.

by 1wa - 50 days ago
Inglewood, CA United States
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 46

I would say Fischer was a product of the times caught-up in issues beyond his ability to just play chess. His political views were based on ignorance. He had no education at the college level as far as I know. I consider him a chess genius to compete at high levels of international strength. A philosopher or humanitarian he was not. What a shame in the final analysis.

by NM GreenLaser - 5 months ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1406

waynepacific - Fischer folded as he had done before when he quit at Sousse and did not enter a US Championship that was a zonal tournament. He was given Benko's spot in the interzonal that led to the title. He never would have become champion without years of help, coaxing, and the help of money - not principle. He had fears, misgivings, panic attacks, and stubborness. He had problems masked by "principle." That does not mean he was always wrong, but he was hurting himself and/or protecting himself in a socially maladjusted shell. Notice an entire article and 17 comments up to yours were only about chess, not politics. You introduced politics and support for Fischer's bigotry. If there were no Jews or Zionists for Fischer and for those who support him to hate, that would not make Fischer a normal, loving person. Up to now, I dealt with Fischer here regarding only chess. I did not evaluate his chess or his forfeiture of the title based on his politics. When I said that I believed he had "shot his load," after winning the title I meant he had lost his motivation and drive. I knew Bobby personally when he seemed to be functioning, and even then some people who knew him better than I did, said he was crazy. It did not seem to be such a clinically correct description then, but was not unreasonable. Some of our common friends would not say anything negative that could get back to him in order to remain in his circle.

by waynepacific - 5 months ago
Malibu, California United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 21

Fischer was a genius that cared deeply about principle. These types do seemingly strange things. He was certainly not crazy as his pro-Zionist detractors claim. If he had been pro Israel, he would be considered the very sane, and a true chess God.

Wayne Pacific

PS: He was anything but a cheap folding chair. He was a chair that would not fold up for anyone or anything.

by NM GreenLaser - 5 months ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1406

At the time Fischer refused to accept any change in his terms for the scheduled title defense in 1975, I believed that he had "shot his load" when he won in 1972. He appeared to value principle over money. Instead of getting the best deal he could and going for the action, he folded like a cheap chair. To me, that was self-destructive behavior. I assumed that he felt that he could lose what he had won and could not win anything greater than what he had. He most likely did not want to give the Soviets a chance to win the title they had tried to keep him from getting. His demand to have draws not counted with ten wins required was fair in the sense that each player had the same chance to win. However, adding that a score of 9-9 was a tie required the challenger to win when ahead 9-8 or lose the match. It is true that FIDE rules had required the challenger to give draw odds in 24 game matches and even more when rematches were required when the champion lost. A match with draws not counting can be of unlimited length. This is a problem for the organizers and the players as was shown when Karpov could not reach six wins in 1984 and his match with Kasparov was stopped. If Fischer had decided to not play in 1975 as early as 1972 or as late as 1974, then he could have been unprepared. He was not active, but he had previously shown that he could prepare without being active. He would still have been a favorite over Karpov, despite unknown preparedness.

by Hammerschlag - 5 months ago
Queens, New York United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 151

"and the free queen at 21? black just takes the bishop with his king like an instinctive chump, apparently forgetting he threatened the queen with a pawn one turn before?" - Devout_Monk

That was not a free Queen. Fischer had a mate threat. f6 and the black Queen must take the pawn on f6 or lose to Rh8#.

Even after Qxf6, Bxf6...black is in danger still of mate (Rh8#) with no way out.

by Dakota_Clark - 5 months ago
Chicago United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 546

and the free queen at 21? black just takes the bishop with his king like an instinctive chump, apparently forgetting he threatened the queen with a pawn one turn before?

by Donald_Lee - 5 months ago
Oregon United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 89

@mmrki

"Fischer should  defended the title by the same terms he  had won it,"

I agree that in the end after  a lot of Fischers requests were in fact met, that Bobby should have conceded the argument and played the match. He would have crushed Karpov.

" i don't see why is he so special? What was he? A god, that all the others had to obey?! "

A god for all others to obey? No, but the fact that you don't see why he was so special shows your bias against Fischer IMO.

" The chess federation did everything they could, the terms that Fischer asked for were unfair."

They were not unfair.

Fishers main concern was the current system promoted the person in the lead to play for draws rather than wins. It did and still does. Fischer was absolutely right on that point. Draws are bad for chess and should be few and far between. They are garbage.

 "In general trought all  chess carear he was behaving lika a spoiled
child, demanding this and that,"

Sometimes when change is needed someone actually has to take a stand and say so.

by NM GreenLaser - 5 months ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1406

EnterTheDragon, if 18...gxf5 19.Bxg7, as shown in the move list, is the correct move order, not 19.Qg3 which allows Qf6.

by EnterTheDragon - 5 months ago
St. Stephen, NB Canada
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 85

Devout Monk, if Black took the Bishop on 16th move it would allow White to capture with Rook and then move his other Rook to h1 which would be death for Black.  If Black captured the knight with g pawn on 18th move he would open that file for White's Queen to come to g3 threatening mate.  Both moves you mentioned would be suicide for Black.

by Mrki - 5 months ago
Belgrade Serbia
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 53

@Gary_Seven:"Kaprov should  of agreed and played Fischer on his terms,back in 1975." Fischer should  defended the title by the same terms he  had won it, i don't see why is he so special? What was he? A god, that all the others had to obey?!  The chess federation did everything they could, the terms that Fischer asked for were unfair. In general trought all  chess carear he was behaving lika a spoiled
child, demanding this and that, the chess federation had to draw the line somewhere. I doubt that he would "of agreed to some of Karpov's terms for 1978 rematch", it would be the same thing all over again.

by clarm55 - 5 months ago
nueva ecijia Philippines
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 3

Thankssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

for d'article...an avid Fischer fan...all d'best

by NM GreenLaser - 5 months ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1406

Devout_Monk, if you play over the moves with the controls below the board, you will only see the moves and comments. If you open the move list, you will be able to use a mouse to play over the analysis in it.

by Dakota_Clark - 5 months ago
Chicago United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 546

Why dont I see a win? and why didn't black take the bishop at 16? knight at 18 with pawn?? or QUEEN AT 21!?

by NM GreenLaser - 5 months ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1406

 nsapkota, use the mouse to highlight the moves in the move list. Your may have to move the highlight back to the last thing there "1-0." to exclude other things. Use Ctrl-C to copy and then go to your word processor or notepad. Use Ctrl-V to paste the moves there. Then you can print out the moves. An alternative is to click "FEN/PGN" and use the same method to print out the game and save the game which may be usable in programs that play pgn files.

by Gary_Seven - 5 months ago
Columbia United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 589

I agreee with that theory of Fischer staying world champion,untill 1978.Kaprov should  of agreed and played Fischer on his terms,back in 1975.The chess federation world  also missed   there only chance to keep the world interested in chess. I 'm sure that Ficher would of retained the title in 1975, and he would of agreed to some of Karpov's terms for 1978 rematch.Fischer,also blew chances for having the U.S rule chess in the 1970's ,and failing to fulfill a duty to his country by a year tour,unstead ,he hid  in the woods and died in the country that helped  his name become a household word. Will anyone ever make a statue of Fischer?

by donngerard - 5 months ago
Cebu Philippines
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 3520

wow! that was awesome!

by PaladinIsBack192 - 5 months ago
Canada
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 133

Indeed, Fischer was a great legend and as said, was a dragon-slayer

by IM IMCheap - 5 months ago
Novosibirsk Russia
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 162

Nice win indeed. Generally, Fischer was a Dragon-slayer. Smile

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.