Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

A Prince Among Composers

Submitted by chessbibliophile on Sun, 09/27/2009 at 12:31am.

 I first saw an endgame study by Leonid Kubbel in a book on combinations by Irving Chernev during my student days.I still remember my sense of awe and wonder at the way in which the Black monarch was chased and how he was mated with a lone knight.Ever since I became an ardent  fan of this composer. But then Kubbel’s admirers are legion. Great players like Vassily Smyslov, Jan Timman and John Nunn have been connoisseurs of his art.In his brief life (1892-1942) Kubbel is said to have composed more than 1500 endgame studies and problems. The Russian edition of his work (1984) lists more than 400 problems. Besides, there are 466 published studies.

Kubbel’s personal life was marked by tragedy.His brothers Arvid and Yevgeny were also composers. Arvid, the elder brother was also a strong chess player, having played in four Soviet Championships. Besides, he composed hundreds of problems, mainly three- movers. He was an accountant by profession, and a harmless citizen.

Yet on the evening of 21st November, he was picked at his home and taken away by the Soviet secret police, the NKVD. According to his nephew, his only crime consisted of the publication of several of his studies in a German magazine, Die Schwalbe. But chess historian Grodzensky suspects the reason was a false accusation-“ or still simpler, the local organs had to fulfil the ‘plan in liquidating the counterrevolutionaries. Twenty years later his widow was told that he died of nephritis while serving the prison term. It is as likely that he was executed by the NKVD in 1938 during the Great Terror. But the public could not be told. So far another thirty years the fiction was maintained that he died in the Nazi attack on Leningrad.(Soviet Chess by Soltis)

Leonid hid his grief and the sad part was that he could not even mention him in his book on the Soviet composers. His own end was also sad. He was trapped in Leningrad during the Nazi siege of the city in the Second World War. Death and disease were rampant in the beleaguered place. He died of dysentery during this terrible period. His brother also perished along with him.In this article I shall present four of his studies.

The first is a delectable draw.

 

 

 

 

 


Now that was a pure composition. The second presents a more serious problem.How do you stop those terrible Black pawns?

White to move and draw

 

 

 

 

 

 


"But I do not like to draw. I want to win." Sure, why not? Here we go!

White to play and win.


That was a poetic finish from a prosaic setting. Here is the last of the problems.In the following position Black appears to have some terrible threats like...Qxf2+ and...gxf6. Shouldn't White be thinking of a draw? No,it's the other way round.

White to play and win


This Study deservedly won the First Prize.

The best work on this great artist is Leonid Kubbel: Chess Endgame Studies by Timothy G.Whitworth.Do not miss the book.

(Available from ARVES: http://www.arves.org/Boeken.htm )

Courtesy:This article first appeared in September 2009 issue of Chess Mate India

 

 

» posted in Endgames
 

Comments:

by theresalion - 2 years ago
theresa,wi United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 4366

#1 do we have the pieces in the right squares i dont see a pinned knight????????????????

by chessbibliophile - 2 years ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2007

Dear friend,

Thanks for the comment.Do check the Solution and the Move list.

by ylg77 - 2 years ago
Tampa United States
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 38

please, 1. Re6 !!, trading the rook for the queen, that's it !!

by chessbibliophile - 2 years ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2007

Dear friend,

Thanks for the comment. Please see if you could spare some time and write a short article on Liburkin with a biographical introduction and a selection of your favourite studies. Also, if you use the puzzles format, young readers would enjoy it very much.

by Liburkin - 2 years ago
Traverse City, MI United States
Member Since: Oct 2009
Member Points: 609

I will return often, and share my favorite studies with you.

by nithubangalore - 2 years ago
bangalore India
Member Since: Oct 2009
Member Points: 12

cool  loved them all

by chessbibliophile - 2 years ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2007

Dear friend,

I am glad you liked them.

by gambit156 - 2 years ago
mumbai India
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 702

beauty

by inotgramps - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 43

Thanks Bibliophile. I see and understand the problem completely now. Every possible combination of moves by Black at any time still allow White to acheive the draw. Nice problem !

by chessbibliophile - 2 years ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2007

Dear stueym,

Your question is the first point of this composition.Do take a look at the Move list.You'll enjoy it.

by stueym - 2 years ago
Leeds United Kingdom
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 37

In Q1, why not 1.Re6? The queen is pinned and, if 1...Qxe6, 2.Nc5+ wins the queen and white has a draw at worst. Or am I missing something obvious...

by chessbibliophile - 2 years ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2007

Dear inotgramps,

1...Qd8 is an interesting attempt.Composers have to think of all these possibilities, or else the study will be "cooked". Do take a look as I have just added the composer's response to 1...Qd8.

by inotgramps - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 43

What happens in the first problem after 1 Nd4...Qd8 ? Does the Chess.com computers still say its a draw for White ?

by chessbibliophile - 2 years ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2007

Dear NM GreenLaser,

 

Troitzky was a pioneer, concerned with both the technical and aesthetic side of endings. Kubbel built on the legacy.There is a  certain romanticism in Kubbel that is his own.I am glad you reminded me about Sam Loyd. I hope to include his problems in a forthcoming review.   

 

 

by NM GreenLaser - 2 years ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 2348

Jan Timman believes that Kubbel was no less talented than Troitzky. Timman  also mentioned that Loyd wanted to bet Steinitz that he could create problems faster than Steinitz could solve them.

by chessbibliophile - 2 years ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2007

Dear wakakaka,

If 3...Qxf6 4.exf6 gxf6 5.f4 threatening c3 mate wins.I have added the variation in the move list.You are always welcome to ask.

by wakakaka - 2 years ago
China
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 3

What if in the last puzzle black plays 3...Qxf6? (leaving black a pawn up and with a passed pawn)

by chessbibliophile - 2 years ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2007

Dear friend,

That's a good question.After 5...dxe1=B, White would merely preserve his knight with a retreat to g3 or e4. Then it's a simple draw. But one should always watch out for these underpromotions. Glad to see your interest.

by woodencardboard - 2 years ago
Missouri United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 268

In the second puzzle, if the black pawn promotes to a bishop, is a knight + bishop mate not possible after Nd3+ move? What's white's response after e1=B?

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.