Garry Kasparov with IBM

Submitted by schahinap on Mon, 08/13/2007 at 1:05pm.

Just over a decade ago, on May 11, 1997, IBM's Deep Blue computer defeated the best chess player in the world, Garry Kasparov. Computer scientist Murray Campbell was one of the programmers of Deep Blue and moved the chess pieces for the computer during the iconic match. In an interview with Wired, Campbell relived the match and commented on modern supercomputing. Campbell said that chess matches between humans and computers have basically reached the end of the line, as computers are being given handicaps, such as playing with fewer pieces or less time, and a basic Cell processor today has as much processing power as Deep Blue did in 1997. Campbell recalled that no one expected the now famous match to attract so much attention, even after Kasparov beat Deep Blue's predecessor Deep Thought in 1989. Deep Blue was able to analyze 200,000,000 moves per second, and was redesigned with chess-specific hardware so it would run more chess patterns--upgrades that were helped by a team of grand masters. When asked about Kasparov's refusal for a rematch, Campbell said the IBM team accomplished what they were trying to and it was time for them to move onto another project. Kasparov has since retired from chess and Deep Blue sits in a museum, but other chess matches between humans and computers still continue. The current world chess champion, Vladimir Kramnik from Russia, lost a match to a PC program in November by four games to two. Von : Schahinap

» posted in Chess Players
 

Comments:

by figrock - 13 months ago
United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 1438

GARRY IS STILL THE GREATEST CHESSMASTER OF THE UNIVERSE..!

by Vegeta2 - 19 months ago
DBZ International
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 974

IBM? Zee of course fritz 7 will win


by Fellippo - 2 years ago
Zlín Czech Republic
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 556
This isn't natural.
by DeepNf3 - 2 years ago
USA, FL United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1337

there is a range that goes from stronger move possible in a position to weaker move in a position, we humans are creative and we have imagination, computers like deep blue etc when playing a WC like kasparov are programmed to always execute that stronger than weaker move in a position, we humans don't play chess like this, top GMs play chess by finding from move 1st("strongest") through 5th maybe 6th in a position, I have made some experiments with chess engines matches myself and I am amazed by what i have found computers seem to have a "mind of its own" in someway, and I don't know exactely how to explain this, but an example of this i had when I experimented with a very sharp variation involving the palaface attack, what I did was I set up the sharp postition i wanted and then i let two engines play it out to my surprice one of the engines played into a variation that involved big material inferiority against itself(eval was against itself too) and a win in its favor was nowhere to be found, yet the engine went on winning that varition several times, this following is one of the games, you can put it in your computer if you want and you will see that evals are against black most of the game

 

this experiment with this varition of the palaface attack i based on ideas from: The Funeral Gambit
by Jeff Anderson
7-3-99


by sk8erkid - 2 years ago
west palm beach, fl United States
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 366
thnks for sharing
by schahinap - 2 years ago
Iran
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 59

But Deep Blue could defeat Garry Kasparov, i'll digram the game for you (Such an amusing game).

the thing that we should know is that Garry Kasparov defeated with a group of human not a computer, and in fact all chess games in the world based on human brains.

by Bonzlibir - 2 years ago
Palawan Philippines
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 198

The rise of the machines has come...

by Akuni - 2 years ago
Nova Scotia Canada
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 1213

"When asked about Kasparov's refusal for a rematch"

I remember Kasparov demanding a rematch and IBM declining and permanently retiring the machine.

by unclemike - 2 years ago
Barbados
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 58
The fact that the computer has no emotions or distractions to combat during a chess game means that the computer will always have the edge over  humans.
 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.