Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Alekhine's Big Nose

Submitted by GM Julio_Becerra on Wed, 03/17/2010 at 8:03am.

It is said that few people in chess have been so uncomplicated and frank as Miguel Najdorf, and for this reason he created around him a very good atmosphere. Maybe for that, it is not surprising that at Buenos Aires 1939 during the Chess Olympiad, the World Champion Alexander Alekhine invited him to share some drinks.

Najdorf recounted this anecdote to New in Chess magazine: When Alekhine said “Miguel let us drink,” I replied to him that I was a poor person, but he told me: “I will pay.” After he drank the whole bottle and I just two glasses, I asked him: "Doctor, do you remember the game that you played against Book, where you sacrificed a rook and you asked me my opinion, once you made the move, and I responded to you 'marvelous?'" Then Alekhine said: “In truth I did not see anything.” “Then, why did you sacrifice the Rook?” “Because a very big nose I have. You know?” -and he added- “A big intuition, like Capablanca.”

Reuben Fine said: “The combination, or well the series of combinations that take place in this game, are, in my opinion, the most outstanding tactical conception of chess history.”

Ok, let us see the game behind this history!

 

» posted in Chess Players
« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Comments:

by leonelcm - 15 months ago
Mexico City Mexico
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 898

vert goos game bya Alekhine, thanx for sharing...

by jimboy_24th - 22 months ago
general santos city Philippines
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 10
wow,,very nice moves...thanks
by ericycsong - 22 months ago
Toronto Canada
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 540

good

by Ch3ck2Ch3ck - 22 months ago
Indianapolis United States
Member Since: Jan 2010
Member Points: 356

Thanks for the wonderful story and game Julio.  I have found that through experience comes intuition about certain postions and possibilities even when you don't have enough time to calculate it all out -as in blitz.  Your gut tells you something is there and you have to have the resolve to just jump in and swim sometimes, right or wrong.  As Hellen Keller once said, "Life is either a daring adventure.. or nothing"  This could very well be applied to chess I would think.

by madpawn - 22 months ago
London England
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 1039

Perhaps it helps to have a drink - but then it could go either way! Amazing.

by dadgum - 22 months ago
colorado United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 13

Why not 9 ...c4 ?

by wujek_dziadek - 22 months ago
Krakow Poland
Member Since: Feb 2010
Member Points: 78

I'm not sure if 16. Qh5 continuation is bad... Bronstein's reccomends that move in his book and Fritz shows 16. ... g6 17. Nxg6 hxg6 18. Qxg6+ Ke7 19. Qg5+ Sf6 20. Qxc5+ Kf7 21. Qxa7+, then bxc3.

by truthteller908 - 22 months ago
United States
Member Since: Dec 2009
Member Points: 26

@hoemberchess

 

Yes I sac'd 3 pieces to open up his uncastled kingside and ended up mating him. Again, I'm a novice and my opponent was just a tiny bit below my skill level so I felt comfortable giving up my pieces for a strong attack. Alekhine probably felt the same way when he was playing Book cause like myself he also knew that he could pull something like that off against a weaker opponent. I would show you the game but it was a live game at my house and I don't bother to record moves.

by TiiK_ToK - 22 months ago
Someplace Nice, Singapore
Member Since: Mar 2010
Member Points: 230

sometimes i sacrifice a piece for a pawn just so i can open up my opponents king side, sometimes it works, sometimes it backfires....But it helps in bullet games mostly.

by Jimmy-the-Hand - 22 months ago
United Kingdom
Member Since: Dec 2009
Member Points: 4

In the first variation provided I was mildly confused why 12.e4! was winning.  I missed 13.Ne5 as a response to 12...Qd7.  I'd gone crawling to Fritz to explain all my troubles away.  Anyway, it argues 13.Ne5 isn't that strong, and hence that 11.Ba4! is not the best refutation to 10...bxc3.  After 11.Ba4! Qxd5 12.e4! (as given in the variation), 12...Qd7 13.Ne5, it's happy to get three minor pieces and a pawn for the queen.  It gives 13...Nxe5 14.Bxd7 Bxd7.  Now white must waste a tempo preventing the 15...Bb5 skewer, which allows black to keep the pawn advantage with 15...cxb2.  White has to lose more material later on to prevent the remaining c-pawn's promotion.

All this is avoided by the simple 10...bxc3 11.dxc6, and White maintains an advantage.

Obviously it's much easier to plug moves into a computer, than work the variations out for oneself, but this game is so far over my head, I needed some help to work out what was going on. 

Have Fritz and I missed something in that 12.e4! actually works, or is swapping the queen for three pieces and a pawn sound?

by JF1 - 22 months ago
Cheltenham United Kingdom
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 209

Some of those moves left me speechless, brilliant play!

by skeletor1 - 22 months ago
Sweden
Member Since: Nov 2009
Member Points: 5

unfortunately this combination is actually worse for white in theory:), its still a draw probably but hey ok lets say its great practical chances for white.

 

But it becomes a flawed masterpiece when it is shown that Alekhine loses all of his later established advantage by playing 19 bf4?. instead of qh5! which wins by force the game for white.

by johncuttlas - 22 months ago
Ghost City Spain
Member Since: Dec 2009
Member Points: 16

Incredible game. I`m amazed at this minds, able to deep, deep thinking or just brilliant

by Muetdhiver - 22 months ago
Maisons-Laffitte France
Member Since: Feb 2010
Member Points: 74

can someone explain why 16.bxc3 deserves a double exclam?

by gelj - 22 months ago
International
Member Since: Oct 2009
Member Points: 13

Nice game and a good presentation. Thanks!

by jlueke - 22 months ago
Saint Paul United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 2211

That is good intuition, knowing that the disarray in black's position with the centralzied king was worth a rook.  If black had played perfectly it would have still been even though he would have to give back the material.

by SpaceOddity - 22 months ago
United States
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 222

what kind of dog is in the picture?  looks like a doberman

by hoemberchess - 22 months ago
Debrecen Hungary
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 131

@GM Julio_Becerra:
thanks for the commented game
i am watching it on my computer

@truthteller908:
3 pieces?! (not pawns?) can we see the game?

by virax - 22 months ago
Kalamazoo United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 141

Some of my best combinations began with a move by intuition.

by Last_Sire03 - 22 months ago
Hawaii United States
Member Since: Feb 2010
Member Points: 208
cool
« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.