Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

An Argentine Nightmare

Submitted by GM Julio_Becerra on Wed, 03/25/2009 at 2:06am.

Several days ago I was watching a wonderful DVD on the Najdorf variation created by Garry Kasparov. Garry who besides being considered one of the greatest chess players in the history of the game is also becoming one of the best commentators of the game as well. “My Brilliant Predecessors” is already a classic, and any serious player who wants to progress in chess will need to be review these works. Now his second series “On Modern Chess”, is also reaching the same stature as his first series.  Without a doubt, the name of Garry Kasparov will leave its mark on chess history, not only as a champion, but also as one of most important chess writers.

I want to talk about an anecdote mentioned by Gary in the first DVD of the series on the Najdorf variation in the Sicilian Defense. In the fourteenth round from Gothenburg Interzonal in 1955 three Soviet players (Keres, Geller and Spassky) played three Argentines players (Najdorf, Panno, Pilnik) The Argentine team had prepared a sharp counter attack beginning with 9… g5!? in the 6.Bg5 variation of the Nadjorf variation of the Sicilian, with which they hoped to surprise the strong Soviet players. Geller in his game versus Panno was first to find the move 11.Nxe6!, which constitutes the beginning of the refutation.  A while later it was imitated by Keres in his game against Najdorf and later the teenager Spassky against Pilnik. But the key move that ruined all the illusions of the Argentinean players was 13. Bb5!! A truly brilliant move found by Paul Keres. Immediately, the other Soviets imitated him. This was not difficult since the games were broadcast on the hanging murals which tracked the games. The final outcome was the sensational victory of the three Soviet players over the three confused Argentineans players, all of whom lost to the same refutation of the same variation!!

Before finalizing this graceful piece of chess history I want to add an additional note: the final result that round between Soviet and Argentineans players was actually 4-0! this was because Petrosian defeated Guimard, but this result came from brilliant play in the Queen’s Gambit!

Let us now enjoy these three jewels of this famous tournament.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

» posted in Opening Theory
« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Comments:

by Ravendon - 2 years ago
Wisconsin United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 207

Wonderful game and interesting part of chess legend.

by invaderX17 - 2 years ago
Fremont,CA United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 361

Brilliant Play.

Invader

by hank100 - 2 years ago
Moscow Russia
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 114

thank you for a brilliant work, and good luck!

by Konstantyn - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 610

It will be very interesting to examine deeply Telmo Escobar vs.Cativelli game to find the answer to Fischers move 13...Rh7.

by SukerPuncher333 - 2 years ago
Canada
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 677

Hi Telmo_Escobar, thanks for pointing out the game.

Black can definitely lose if not played properly, but I'm wondering if the deepest modern analysis considers this a win for White. The last time I checked, they still haven't found anything against Fischer's 13...Rh7. I believe the current analysis finds, at best, only a draw for White.

Besides, Cativelli isn't exactly a GM. Maybe he just lost because he defended poorly, who knows.

by SukerPuncher333 - 2 years ago
Canada
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 677

Hi GM Becerra, is 11.Nxe6 really a refutation? I thought Fischer found 13...Rh7, which defends nicely against Geller's sacrifice? Has anyone found a new refutation to Fischer's defense?

by lopside - 2 years ago
Ney Yook CT United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 194

I ran the game past Fruit quickly and it won for white in a more convoluted line, with black squirming for quite a while.  Fruit's play most resembled the Spassky game.  I didn't give it a huge amount of time to think on it, so perhaps there are more immediate mating options available.  Ultimately Fruit mated on the 49th move after eliminating all of black's material.  

by Telmo_Escobar - 2 years ago
La Plata Argentina
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 42

 Sukerpuncher, examine the following game where 13...Rh7! was played. This game demonstrates that it´s not so easy to get a draw with Black.

 

by ty4playing - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 280

Instructive bit of history!

by illusivelord - 2 years ago
Oregon United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 24

Black doesn't play 13...axb6 because that would be followed by O-O+ and a quick loss

by SukerPuncher333 - 2 years ago
Canada
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 677

This story isn't complete though. 13...Ne5 is losing for Black, but Fischer later found 13...Rh7. After that, White has no better than a draw. So Geller's knight sacrifice is actually not winning.

by greenbean - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 23

Why not 13...axb5 Or, in the Geller-Panno game, 17...axb5 (both chances to capture white's Bb5 were actually available to Panno)? Why did the Argentine team have to play black in every game, and why did they keep playing the same variation, even after losing with it not only the first, but the second time?

by Philipper - 2 years ago
Maastricht Netherlands
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 81

brilliant game by spassky

by Kinan - 2 years ago
Tartous Syria
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 358

Nightmare indeed.

I see Brazilians are happy :P

by DaPharaoh - 2 years ago
Gaithersburg, MD United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1411

wow that was impressive..

by Benefactor - 2 years ago
Mexico
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 505

I think I once read that Fischer rehabilitated the variation for Black,can anyone shed some light on this??

by colfk - 2 years ago
SanJose,California United States
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 39

Good examples of what not to do to the King.

by Gerik - 2 years ago
Camping in the United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 777

thank you- very nice and informing. please keep posting. 

by macaoui - 2 years ago
HK Hong Kong
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 108

pero soy bueno, hijos de soviets!

by kirkland - 2 years ago
martinez Ga. United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 273

cool i know the first few moves of this sicilian, however im trying to learn why i would use the opening ive learned that you control the center squares develope your peices and defend and attack and soforth, thanks for the article and evrything

« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.