Attacking w/o the Queen

Submitted by benws on Wed, 06/04/2008 at 6:10pm.

It always seems that whenever we lose our queen, our means to attack shut down, and none will succeed. But the truth is, some of the best attacks come with the queens gone and imagination at its highest rate.

NOTE: ANNOTATIONS BY EDMAR MEDNIS. 


» posted in Tactics
 

Comments:

by Timeyo_R_Nkosi - 4 months ago
Kitwe Zambia
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 236
Great moves
by BirdBrain - 4 months ago
KY United States
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 683

Kengis is the bomb.  I used to have a book, Play 1...b6!, and there were a few of his games in there.


by Balajibsin - 4 months ago
Kuwait India
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 29

After 17.Ned3, I would have played Rxd3.  The sacrifice is worth it.  This makes escape possible.  After 17....Rxd3, a4+ is not possible since Nb3 is vulnerable.

If Nxd3, then bxe7 pinning the Knight and the Rook.

exd3 is not possible bcoz Rd1 is vulnerable.

If Rd1xd3 then also Nb3 is vulnerable.


by kenytiger - 4 months ago
United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1028
That was a vicious attack by White. After the exchange of Queens he went straight for the knockout, Black never had a chance to breath.
by Dozy - 4 months ago
Blue Mountains Australia
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 793
That knight sac was brilliant.  How good have you got to be to play like that against an opponent as strong as Andersson?
 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.