Bogoljubow-Capablanca, Bad Kissingen 1928

Submitted by NM GreenLaser on Sat, 06/27/2009 at 2:50pm.

José Raúl Capablanca Y Graupera was born in Cuba on November 19, 1888 and died March 8, 1942. He was a great chess prodigy who learned the game by watching at the age of four. He was the game's greatest natural talent and one of the greatest players ever. He burst on the international scene in 1911 and was quickly regarded as the world's best player, especially at speed chess. In his prime he was known as the Chess Machine. In 1921, he won the world championship from Emanuel Lasker and became the first to ever win that title without losing a game. That was not done again until Kramnik defeated Kasparov in 2000. Capablanca lost his title in 1927 to Alexander Alekhine, another all time great. Alekhine did not give Capablanca a return match and avoided playing in the same event with him many times. In the following game, Capablanca meets Efim Bogoljubow (spelling varies). Bogoljubow was born April 14, 1889 and died June 18, 1952. The game was played at Bad Kissingen 1928. Bogoljubow had been speaking of Capablanca declining as a player. It is true that Capa had lost his title and had said that he had peaked in 1919. It is true that Bogojubow won the tournament with 6 wins, four draws, and one loss for a score of 8-3, while Capa had 4 wins, 6 draws, and one loss for a score of 7-4. Capablanca's score was good for clear second in the event that included 12 great players, with Alekhine and Lasker absent. It is also true that Bogoljubow's loss was to Capablanca. It is also true that Alekhine, while avoiding Capablanca, played two matches for the title with Bogoljubow, in 1929 and 1934. Alekhine then played Max Euwe and lost his title, but won it back in a return match. Capablanca was never given that chance, after all, Alekhine, when asked to explain how he won the title from Capablanca, was only to say he did not know. Others say Alekhine worked hard and Capablanca was too sure of himself in general and had previously dominated Alekhine. The opening in the game was a Queen's Indian Defense. The variation used was to provide Capablanca several wins.  As usual, there are game references and original analysis.

» posted in Opening Theory
 

Comments:

by littleAlekhine - 4 months ago
Stuttgart Germany
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 203

Very interesting article!

by averil - 4 months ago
Manila Philippines
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 77

Interesting game. Capablanca was truly one of the greatest chess players of his time.

by NM GreenLaser - 4 months ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1406

jamesjddongchess asked "what was the point of bogo's pawn sack 27. g5" Before 27.g5, Black's g- and h-pawns were better than White's two g-pawns. White was trying to change the pawn structure and was searching for activity. It did not work. However, if you look at the line beginning with 36.Nc3 (instead of 36.Rf2) and click the subvariation ending with "41.Kb2 should draw," you will see a position that Bogoljubow could have tried to get in which Black's extra pawn is not as useful on g5 as it would be if it were still on h6. I also showed 36.Nc3 Rg2 (instead of 36...bxc3) 37.Ne2 Rxg4 winning, so Capablanca could have avoided the drawish line..

by Politicalmusic - 4 months ago
Alabama United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 2451

Nasty!

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.