Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Building a Fortress

Submitted by GM vbhat on Mon, 12/21/2009 at 10:07pm.

I recently completed a tournament in Navalmoral de la Mata (Spain) where I finished with 7.0/9. My only loss of the event was to the top seed, GM Sergey Fedorchuk, in the 3rd round (Fedorchuk coasted to first place with 7.5/9). The game featured a lot of strange material allocations in the middlegame that had both of us wondering who was playing to win. The questions continued into the endgame where a number of theoretical endgames could have arisen. I have looked at a few such endgames endgames (like Q vs 2 minor pieces and Q vs R + pawn), and while they didn't actually arise during the game, you'll see that they easily could have occurred in the notes. In the end though, under severe time pressure, I failed to build a fortress and he won the endgame.

Question 1: What would you play as Black after 14.Qe2?

Question 2: What would you play as Black after 28.Ba2?

Question 3: What piece would you take here as White - the bishop on a2 or the knight on d6?

Question 4: What is White's basic strategy to win this endgame?

Even though I lost this game, I wasn't too disappointed with the result. It was a complicated fight with lots of interesting moments to look at. Here's the entire game in one viewer:

» posted in Endgames
« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Comments:

by GM vbhat - 2 years ago
Richmond, CA United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 233

Merchco,

47...Rxb4 drops the rook to 48.Qc5+ and 49.Qxb4.

I should have mentioned 39...Bxf4, but I don't think it saves Black: After 40.Qd4+ Be5 (otherwise the Be6 just hangs) 41.Rxe5 Nxe5 42.Qxe5+ Kf7 43.Qf6+! picks the Be6 up for free.

Vinay

by merchco - 2 years ago
Dublin Ireland
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 2551

In this game is 39 bf4 not a good /better choice

by merchco - 2 years ago
Dublin Ireland
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 2551

Move47 why not rook xb4

by shareefh - 2 years ago
Amman Jordan
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 227

Thanks for sharing ur up and downs in ur games..i think it's good to player sharing his games..thanks again..good game and cool articls.Smile

by invaderX17 - 2 years ago
Fremont,CA United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 361

very interesting game.

by namitgaur - 2 years ago
Saint Louis United States
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 86

good game.

by Tricklev - 2 years ago
Sweden
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 2191

Very exciting and inbalanced game, great article.

by ericycsong - 2 years ago
Toronto Canada
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 540

coolCool

by sryiwannadraw - 2 years ago
Southern Coast United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 453

Nice game

by tadartabo - 2 years ago
arunachal pradesh,itanagar India
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 154

great article!!!!!!!!

by nocixema - 2 years ago
Aguascalientes Mexico
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 4

Awesome game man

by GM vbhat - 2 years ago
Richmond, CA United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 233

By the way, as the opening name, I'm not really sure where the line is drawn between the Keres and the Graf. Maybe it's the ...exd4 idea.

As to the suggestion that instead of ...f5, Black plays Bf6-g7, I think that's a pretty solid suggestion. Actually, I played a very similar setup in a game a couple months ago against FM Todd Andrews (I annotated it here: http://www.chess.com/article/view/nobody-expects-the-spanish-inquisition). White's queen was badly placed on d3 in that game, but if not objectively better than what I did here, it was at least a safer option.

by GM vbhat - 2 years ago
Richmond, CA United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 233

I think if I had more time, I would have drawn the actual Q vs R + N endgame, but I probably would have needed more than just an extra minute or two. The ...a5 idea probably isn't one that would occur to me that quickly.

Strangely enough, if he played the 41.Kh1 move instead of 41.Rxe5, we would likely have got to a Q vs 2 minor piece endgame (probably 2 knights), and I think I would have had better chances of drawing that than the Q vs R + N endgame. That's even though the Q vs R + N is objectively more of a draw. With everything on one side, and him having to sidestep lots of tricky knight forks while playing on the increment, I think that might have been an easier practical chance for me. I wasn't really thinking about that during the game, and I doubt he was. When you're playing on the increment like that, you don't usually have time to be so clever. =)

by andrew1023 - 2 years ago
atlanta Georgia United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 272

Do you think if the time had been different you would have been able to pull off a draw or a win.  Interesting how white, with the queen v 2 minor pieces had a much simpler endgame which was advantageous with the +30 second time rule.  Having to coordinate more pieces takes more time.

Did you think about this during the game?  Did he?

by m_ebeed - 2 years ago
Egypt
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 569

good game

by heatsh - 2 years ago
Kluang, Johor Malaysia
Member Since: Nov 2009
Member Points: 697

good game

by jontsef - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 169

Very nice game.

 

BTW isn't the opening the Keres and it's only Graf's line if Black plays exd4 after 12.Nbd2?

by tanmay_chakrabarti - 2 years ago
Uttarpara India
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 2093

Good representation.

by FURQUAN - 2 years ago
DELHI India
Member Since: Oct 2009
Member Points: 11

BLACK COULD HAVE WON IN ANY CASE IF HE HAD MANOUVERED HIS PIECES BETTER IN ENDGAME.

by vandalija - 2 years ago
Lobo British Virgin Islands
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 285

15.Nb7 meant trouble for the black

« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.