Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Carlsen vs. Nakamura: the Clash of the Giants

  • GM Gserper
  • | Apr 28, 2014
  • | 25459 views
  • | 65 comments

There are not many duels between elite chess players that generate as much interest as the games between the World Champion Magnus Carlsen and the U.S. number one Hikaru Nakamura. Indeed, everyone can find something of interest. What will prevail: solid positional chess or total chaos on the board, G-Star Raw or Ray-Ban, orange juice or Red Bull?

If only they could use some flashy nicknames... just imagine the match: "The Norwegian Undertaker" vs. "Big H." Add the fireworks, scantily clad girls, some trash talk before the games, and the best hotels in Las Vegas would be fiercely competing for the honor of hosting such a match. Unfortunately, there is a fly in the ointment. The score of the classical games played by these two mega stars is ten to zero in the World Champion's favor (not counting 15 draws).

No matter how great the situation on the board looks for Nakamura, he can never score! Just look at the game where Hikaru was closest to a win. The position is exactly what Nakamura can only dream about. Not only is he winning, but it is also very sharp. Under normal circumstances it would be a piece of cake for Nakamura to find a winning line in such a position, but this time "a human computer" missed a direct win. Can you, dear readers, find it?

It is a beautiful combo which shouldn't be too difficult to find for a super GM. Yet, look what happened in the actual game:

The recent Gashimov Memorial added more insult to Nakamura's injury.

By the way, judging by the reports, it is probably one of the best organized tournaments ever! I saw the pictures and can only say "wow!"

Carlsen - Nakamura | Image © Chess.com

Now, let's take a brief look at Nakamura's ninth loss:

Of course, it looks like one of many dozens of typical games of Carlsen where he gradually grinds down his opponent. Now, please take a look at my article The Art of Doing Nothing which was published abount one month before the Carlsen - Nakamura game.

Magnus Carlsen | Image © Chess.com

There you can find exactly the same diagram. And here is my comment from that article: "It is interesting to note that Carlsen played this variation with both White and Black! It is more proof that our World Champion plays different openings and variations, but the only thing that stays the same is the result of his games!"

Moreover, in part four of that article (which was published just a couple of weeks before the game Carlsen - Nakamura) I mentioned another game of Carlsen's that featured the same position:

In part four I also explained the mystery of Carlsen's strange 21. Rc2 followed by 22.Rcc1 which looked like just a waste of time. Now look at the recent game Carlsen - Nakamura, don't you think that his 6. Be2 followed by 7. Bd3 was just another fine example of "doing nothing?" In my opinion, it was not the most practical desision to allow Carlsen to play a position which allows him to do nothing as much as he wants. Besides, Magnus has played it many times for both colors and had a lot of experience there. Finally, this kind of the position doesn't fit Nakamura's dynamic style.

By the way, talking about dynamic style, let's look at the second game they played in the Gashimov Memorial. The game was already analyzed dozens of times by all the major computer engines, so I'm not going to repeat the same lines again. What really surprised me is the next position:


True to his style, Carlsen kept creating practical problems even in a strategically inferior position, but his move 24...h5!? looks like a little bit too much. Yes, these days chess players spend so much time with their computers that they don't pay much attention to such factors like "weakening your king" or "high concentration of white pieces on the kingside." If there is no forced refutation, they, just like computers, play a risky looking move. Yet, I was surprised that Nakamura didn't try to immediately punish Carlsen for breaking one of the major rules of chess: "Do not push pawns on the side you are weaker lest you create new targets for your opponent's attack." Let's see what could happen in one more or less forced line:


I don't care what chess engines say about the final position of the variation, Nakamura had to go for this line. Why? Because Carlsen told him so! Not sure what I mean? Then look at one of the previous encounters of the same two giants:


It looks to me like Carlsen gave a master class on the topic: "an exchange sacrifice to ruin the opponent's king and get a powerful knight on h5." Why didn't Nakamura follow the footsteps of the World Champion? Beats me! Or maybe Korchnoi was right when he insisted that Carlsen hypnotizes his opponents? Smile

Hikaru Nakamura | Image Zurich Chess Challenge

So, does Nakamura have a chance to ever beat "Magnus the Invincible?" To cheer up Hikaru, I recommend him to watch the next clip:

To paraphrase the punch-line, let me ask: "Over? Was it over when Mikhail Botvinnik crushed Bobby Fischer in the beginning of their World Championship match?"

Meanwhile, I'll get popcorn and reserve the front seats for the continuation of the Clash of the Giants!


RELATED STUDY MATERIAL

Comments


  • 3 weeks ago

    JoeTheV

    How is this a rivalry if Carlsen is clearly the victor and better player of the match due to the lopsided score in his favor?

    I prefer Kramnik-Carlsen as a rivalry.

  • 3 months ago

    Ziik

    carlsen will no more longer be the best

  • 4 months ago

    JustanAmateur

    'scantily clad girls'......come on...lets leave sh/t like this in the dark ages 

  • 4 months ago

    yureesystem

    Thank you GM Serper, I always look forward to your articles and this current one is your best!

  • 4 months ago

    KOJER

    matein8                

    thank you Smile

  • 4 months ago

    ArchDyne

    no one can beat you this time exept yourself ....

  • 4 months ago

    sic123

    I used to  be a fan of Anand. But now he* has little or no hope of  being WCC [World Chess Champion]Cry

    Unless he works reeeeeeeeally hard.Embarassed

    Wish him luck.

     

    Please note that he refers to Anand.

  • 4 months ago

    matein8

    Kojer, after Qf1 Qxg5, white plays Nh6+. After Kxg7 (forced, unless Qxh6 Rxh6) comes Rg2 winning the Black Queen for the Rook.

  • 4 months ago

    KOJER

    in board 1 after Qf1 carlsen will play 

      
    and  win the white rook
  • 4 months ago

    laurentiu3000

    batmans returns or what ?

  • 4 months ago

    b2b2

    A bit naive; Carlsen does not view Nakamura as his peer.  In an interview for Norwegian communications Carlsen said Kramnik's Best Games was an influence; but, Kramnik thinks of himself as the best but he is not.  That Kramnik even lost to Nakamura. 

    Carlsen views Aronian as a threat (peer), while Nakamura is not there yet.  Perhaps this is in reference to Nakamura's endgame skills.  (Admittedly, Carlsen and Aronian both have favorable scores against Nakamura.)  

    Carlsen fails to realize that skill sets at the top are relative.  Compared to the skill sets of these giants even Carlsen pales.

    Lasker - mathematician/scholar/teacher,
    Capablanca and Alehine, - humanities/law, 
    Botvinnik - electrical engineer/computer scientist,
    Tal- literature,
    Smyslov - singer (baritone)
    Karpov - mathematics/economics
    Kasparov - author

  • 4 months ago

    negotiate

    Thank you for the very interesting article. Naka has time to get his nerves under control, he is in a good place, and we will see more top level play from him.  Fischer-Botvinnik was a great tournament but it would have been nice to see Fischer not be so demanding of the organizers all the time, maybe playing more after that as I think that his course of action after the tournament could have continued to strengthen and popularize chess the way Carlsen is doing today.

  • 4 months ago

    WallaceMrWest

    I think Nakamura is afraid of Calrsen due to loss record history so he fears to attack and goes on the defensive..If he was playing an anonymous oppoent without realising it is carlsen perhaps he would have had the confidence to find the winning moves

  • 4 months ago

    IM Silman

    @ AnlamK: “I'm not denying being critical (or even negative) but where was I rude or impolite?”

    And therein lies the problem. Your honor, I rest my case.

  • 4 months ago

    WhiteKnight95

    Yeah! Let's get together and talk about a game and pretend we are doing something productive with our lives. And while we're at it, let's get into arguments and try to exert our intellectualy dominance to impress a bunch of other old dried up men who lie to themselves by telling themselves that the world gives two squirts of piss about the 1989 World Chess Championship. Well wasn't it just the most curious thing that "an exchange sacrifice to ruin the opponent's King and get a powerful Night on h5....".....NOBODY. CARES.

  • 4 months ago

    pundai_aandi

    Nakamura is world #7 and his Peak #3 occured only during a month. Among his generation players Carlsen, Aronian, Caruna and Grischuk all are above Nakamura and Nakamura-Carlsen games get attentions only because of Nakamura's trash talks/tweets. 

    If Carlsen has any threat that is only possible from Caruana and Aronian. 

  • 4 months ago

    pan34pan

    What if black responds with the Night instead of a pawn move: 37. Qf1 Nd6

  • 4 months ago

    pan34pan

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 4 months ago

    hypernovae86

    a few world champs had in their prime days a good "customer" from the top 10. for example Lasker had Marshall and recently Gary had Shirov. on the way to top Botvinik had Keres and Tal had Bobby (you know who).a notable exception who had more than one was Karpov. fifteen years or so never lost in a tournament by a soviet outside soviet-union.
  • 4 months ago

    StevieBlues

    Loving your articles lately Mr. Serper

Back to Top

Post your reply: