Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Caught Off-guard by GM Magesh and GM Arun

Submitted by GM thamizhan on Thu, 10/01/2009 at 12:30am.

Most smart players have a knack for taking their opponents into uncomfortable areas very early in the game. Like we have discussed in previous articles, chess not only involves strategy over the board, but also before the actual game is started. So what would you do to make your opponent uncomfortable? I (Magesh) learned more about this the hard way in two of my recent games being on the receiving end. In this hypermodern chess era nothing really seems to be wrong. Plenty of new ideas float around breaking all the age-old strategic rules. But we all know that there is only one rule in this world, yes “Every single rule is meant to be broken!” In this case I would like to share my ideas when I encountered the Groningen Attack, an early g4 from white launching an assault on my kingside without completing his development; not very conservative, but very effective.

 

This summer has been a great run for both me and Arun as we played several tournaments over a period of three months and ended up gaining a few rating points. The first game today comes from the Scottish Chess Championship this year in the month of July. I had three points out of three rounds and I was up against this young kid from Iceland named Kjartansson Gudmundur. Though he was reasonably lower rated than me, I did not take anything for granted as I had watched him convincingly beat Arun in the previous game with the black pieces. Something that does not happen very often.

 

 

 

 

It was a nice finish from my opponent. I tried to study the opening in-between my hectic playing schedule, but I did not manage to put in enough work. Little did I know that I would be facing the same opening again in a very critical game within a few months.

 

I was having a wonderful performance in the recent Kolkatta open with a 2700 tournament performance. In round seven I faced the top seed, Mamedyarov Shahriyar with the black pieces. I studied his openings, but it is not easy to study all of the openings a 2700 player plays. I was caught off guard yet another time and beaten convincingly.

 

 

 

Now that I have made the same mistake twice, I am ready to face it. They say that smart men learn from their mistakes, but wise men learn from others' mistakes. We have shared our mistakes, it is up to you guys to be wise!

» posted in Opening Theory
« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Comments:

by GM thamizhan - 2 years ago
Chennai India
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 432

andmark   ---> 16.Qh4 doesnt really launch any attack as the white king is the queenside, also the e5 pawn is left unprotected, so white can reply 17.Qe5

 

feyterman  --->  If you mean i should take the pawn on g4, i did have that opportunity, but white would get to attack my knight with Rg1 followed by h3 and eventally capture the g7 pawn when my knight moves

 

conman1000  ---> White could have played Ng5, but black would reply hxg5 and open the h file for the rook and whites pawn structure would be very bad after that

 

opposedteafight ---> Whitesox replied to your question quite correctly. The bishop goes to b4 not just for a pin, it is there to try and destroy whites pawn structure and remove the knight from the board to take control of e4. If you notice that is why white does not get e4 easily in Nimzo Indian defense, white will have to preapre slowly and play e4 in most cases

 

attat ---> We have suggested some other possibilities like 8...c5 in the first game and 5...b6 or 6...d5 in the second game. Some games even ended up with good results for black. Unfortunately there are no clear cut solutions in chess, we can just look at different ideas and keep venturing them out...

 

mercho --->  As i had mentioned in the article itself, sometimes playing against a 2700 player can make a normal GM look like an amateur. The point i was focusing was that this opening idea worked twice against me and it can work for you guys also, or if you face it the next time you will have some idea about it is. We all make mistakes and we try to get better....

by andmark - 2 years ago
Somewhere in England
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 81

On move 16, you did c5. To launch an attack I would suggest Qh4

by feyterman - 2 years ago
Auckland New Zealand
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 861

why not just take the pawn each time?

by conman1000 - 2 years ago
North Carolina United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 2100

In the second game, why did he not play 13. Nxg5?

by hyperniko - 2 years ago
(TX USA) Philippines
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 236

On Mamedyarov, Shakhriyar (2724) vs. Panchanathan, Magesh (2532)

22. ... O-O is a blunder 23. Qxg7 Mate.

by theresalion - 2 years ago
theresa,wi United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 4366

ok have you found a stopper??

by WhiteSox7 - 2 years ago
Chicago United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 29

opposedteafight putting the bishop on b4 does more than just create a pin after d4, the main idea is putting pressure indirectly on the d5 and e4 squares

by Gert-Jan - 2 years ago
Groningen Netherlands
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 1595

good article with good games.

by opposedteafight - 2 years ago
Grand Prairie TX United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 29

OK, I known I am not the most sophisicated chess player, but I don't understand why .. 3Bb4?  Your opponent has not yet played d4, so this move does not get you a pin.  Do you really want to trade a bishop for a knight in a open game?    Any insight into this move would be rather helpful.  Thanks for the collumn.

by attatt - 2 years ago
w United States
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 1

what the heck was the proper defense? You give up your mistakes, but ont tell us what you should have done which would be really useful for beginners like myself

by sryiwannadraw - 2 years ago
Southern Coast United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 453

good games

by merchco - 2 years ago
Dublin Ireland
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 2551

[Comment deleted for rudeness]

by pmrichard_93 - 2 years ago
CT United States
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 106

awsome

by GRThompson - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 48

THank you for your insights.  These are fun and complex games. Very enjoyable.

by bugswattr - 2 years ago
Aurora United States
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 215

complex games are wonderful, if you can build up enough tension, when you break it you can ensure yourself an advantage instead of hoping for an open board where you can fork off a lot of pieces

by Weal - 2 years ago
Gaza Palestine
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 3240

I don't like playing complex games!

by aieplm - 2 years ago
manila Philippines
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 187

good,losing is not important at least you know your mistake good luck in your tournament ahead.

by EnamouredKnight - 2 years ago
Valhalla Croatia
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 192

i really feel for you man. a great and honest article, i wish you all the best against this dreaded opening(:

by Knightsight - 2 years ago
Kent United Kingdom
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 437

Excellent article and a very honest appraisal of two very interesting games.  Would it be possible, after your resignations, to enter the moves how the game may have continued toward checkmate - just for us thickies.  Many thanks.

by Samael12V - 2 years ago
Santo Domingo Dominican Republic
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 46

Awesome games, I would have felt really sad for losing the 1st game, but the 2nd one it's ok, he's way overrated :P

« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.