Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Checkhover II

Submitted by MikeRoesell on Mon, 07/20/2009 at 10:32pm.

     OK. I was bored today. This is the second installment in my series of articles on the Checkhover Variation of the Sicilian.  In my first article I went through 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Qxd4 Nc6 5.Bb5 Bd7 6.Bxc6 Bxc6.  This time I will be going through the moves 6…bxc6 and then go in 4...Bd7. One thing that you may want to consider doing is read the articles in order because the patterns build on one another. Here is the link to the first article

http://www.chess.com/article/view/the-sicilian-checkhover-variation-a-diamond-in-the-rough2

     Starting with the regular Checkhover move order 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Qxd4 Nc6 5.Bb5 Bd7 6.Bxc6 I will now concentrate on the move 6…bxc6.  This move is somewhat less aggressive than Bxc6 but I think that it gives white too free of a hand during the game. Play continues like this 6…bxc6 7.0-0 then 7…e5 is almost forced.  The reason is that if Black plays 7…Nf6 then e5 is very hard for Black to deal with.  After 7…e6 then 8.Qd3 d5 9.Nc3 Be7 10.b3 Nf6 11.e5 and white has the advantage.  But back to the main line.

 
     Now for the second move that is in for consideration. This move is more popular and I have several GM games with it.  This move is Bd7 intending Nc6 with out the possibility of the Bb5 pin.  This move has one drawback that has arrisen and that is that it allows white to go into the Marcozy Bind with 5.c4.  This is hard for Black to fight against but not impossible for them to overcome, believe me I have lost badly to this variation in the bind at the hands of a good player.  But now for the fun.  1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Qxd4 Bd7 5.c4 Nf6 6.Qd2
    That's it for today.  I'll finish the articles with one on 4...a6 in the near future.  I would like to have any and all feedback that you have ON the article.  If you have questions or ideas I will try to answer them to the best of my ability, and if I can't then I'll ask someone who can get me the answers.  Thanks for the read hope that you enjoyed another of my favorite openings.  Good luck to all

» posted in Opening Theory
 

Comments:

by MikeRoesell - 2 years ago
Crete, IL United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 300

Wow thanks. 

by Vandarringa - 2 years ago
Iowa United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 264

I just played the Checkhover in a tournament game against a much higher-rated opponent, and totally forgot the Maroczy bind idea after 4...a6 and played 5. Nc3.  I lost the game, and I probably would have lost either way, but I wish I would have checked out your article before the tournament!

by crowrevell - 2 years ago
e1 United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 183

The Sicilian Checkover Polgar System is indeed a viable openning. While i think it is very drawish at high levels (due to the early exchanges and sacrificing the bishop pair), it is a strong, aggressive system for sub 1900s. I am using the openning in the sicilian themed tournament (1600-1800) and have not lost as white.

by anuj_manerikar - 2 years ago
Pune India
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 200

and yo all the fools replying over here the game is on logical thinking and even about theory which is well posted through this article but it doesnt matter if you know or do not know the bloody crap opening all you have to do is play logically and searc for tactics thats they way to winning.

by anuj_manerikar - 2 years ago
Pune India
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 200

no no this is a very instructive article and my fide rating is 1987 its 1686 at this site coz i dont play much and please challenge me I wanna play with you.

lets see who is the better one.

by gkayadurmus - 2 years ago
ankara Turkey
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 7

it was very instructive. thanks for the article

by Prathikshena - 2 years ago
Daytona Beach United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 144

great article... Its the first time i am seeing the Checkhover.

by MikeRoesell - 2 years ago
Crete, IL United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 300

 Hey I'm not sure what you mean because in the second game 8.Nxe5 is impossible and in the first game it is just hanging a knight would you take a look and see if you didn't make a mistake when you wrote that comment.

by Kingfisher - 2 years ago
Johannesburg South Africa
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 1929

Any thoughts on 8. Nxe5? I know after Qe2 it doesn't accomplish much besides open lines, but I think white has good chances of attacking the kingside once he develops.

by MikeRoesell - 2 years ago
Crete, IL United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 300

One final thing before I let this go anuj_manerikar.  You say that I am a fool and post this crappy article on an opening that higher ups won't even touch.  This game goes out to you from your betters (most everyone)

This is a  game that the current WORLD CHAMP uses this opening to defeat one of the best players of all time. If you think that you are better than them then why isn't that rating that you are rubbing in my face higher?  YOU HAVE A 1600 highest rating. WOW that's high.(sarcasm) Vishy had 2725 and he beat Kasparov 2795 I think that they make you comment null and void.


by MikeRoesell - 2 years ago
Crete, IL United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 300

He's playing my variation of the sicilian and his dragon has one thing that i like "sac, sac mate" BF

and if he plays the accelerated dragon then i play the rossolimo and he's dead because he's probably not familar with them.

by gxtmf1 - 2 years ago
Mundelein United States
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 1309

You should just let him play the Sicilian; he's ignorant enough to not realize that you can't play the Dragon if you initiate the Chekhover.

by MikeRoesell - 2 years ago
Crete, IL United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 300

Guys don't worry about anuj_manerikar I have a wonderful way to deal with short sighted people like him.  This method doesn't involve the mods and doesn't involve muting him. 

   If he wants to say that he is better than me and my opening then he will need to prove that he is a better player than me.  I have issued a challenge to him for a Checkhover game where he plays black and i have white in the Checkhover after Qxd4.  He is free to play however he wishes but I will have to say that if there is cheating then the mods will come in. 

  For the Mods, you guys may do what you think is best but i would ask you to let me show this rude person in the proper manner who is better and that my opening and theory and more importantly time weren't wasted.  This would be available for all to see the proper way to handle people like him in my opinion, over a chess board.

 

Thanks all for the Kind feed back and i have challenged him let's see what happens.  I will post the game as it goes on and we'll see who the better player is. Good luck to all and use this opening i think you will enjoy the positions that come up.

by bigbear153 - 2 years ago
Waymart,Pa. United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 18

Thank you for taking the time on brilliant work. Please continue to add on insight, as you see a  progressive chess future in this line of study.

by gxtmf1 - 2 years ago
Mundelein United States
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 1309

1. Anuj is a jerk- you should either block him or have hime booted off chess.com

2. The dragon? Really? Anuj, don't you realize that this completely pertains to you because Black can't force the dragon on white. 

3. Mike, thanks for the article! I had only heard of the Maroczy Bind and now that I see it, I have to admit that it looks scary for Black.

by PhilipB - 2 years ago
UK United Kingdom
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 172

Anuj,

Please do not be rude.

Both Adams and Topalov are among the best players in the world and so the opening must have something to recommend it.

I thought the article was interesting and well written and I certainly learnt something.

Thank you

by hyperniko - 2 years ago
(TX USA) Philippines
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 236

I have encounter this opening before but I didn't know it is called checkhover sicilian. I will try to use it. Somehow it is like the Philidor (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 ed4 4.Qd4 Nc6 5.Bb5) It is good opening theory. thank you.

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.