Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Colle-Koltanowski Revisited

Submitted by chessbibliophile on Sun, 07/12/2009 at 1:12am.

My  recent review of the Colle-Koltanowski System has raised quite a few questions.

(http://www.chess.com/article/view/the-colle-koltanowski-system )

First, I would like to thank all the readers who have offered feedback so far.A well-informed discussion is good for everybody.

A few words about the author:

 Bronznik


Valery Bronznik is an International Master and chess coach with 20 years of experience.He is also the author of works on  other openings like the Tschigorin Defence and Sicilian Paulsen Variation. Recently he has written a book on technique in chess positions.All these titles are in German.Only the books on  Colle-Koltanowski and Tschigorin Defence have been translated into English.  

As for the book under review, I would still urge the readers to go through the Introduction readily available ( in pdf. file) from the publisher's site:http://www.kaniaverlag.de/htm/englisheditions.html

It would answer most of the questions raised in the comments posted on the review.

Here I shall deal with other specific points.

Question:Why does Black play  a move like...e6 instead of  actively developing the bishop to f5?

Answer:Let us take a look at the position.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Question:What if Black tries to play a line similar to the Tschigorin Defence here?

Answer:Here is a likely position.


 

 

 

 

 

 


Comment:The article mentions that after 1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.e3 Bf5 white should play 4.c4. But after... c6 we enter a Main Line Slav which means that white suddenly has to acquaint himself with a different and important opening, which somewhat defeats the object of being a Colle player.

Clarification: " I would not recommend to you to use the Colle-Koltanowski setup against all the possible openings-you can get into a completely unfamiliar position where you will be desperate to find a suitable plan. But with some additional variations from other openings-according to the recommendations in this chapter-you will be well-prepared for the start of the game!"- Bronznik

Amen!

» posted in Opening Theory
 

Comments:

by chessbibliophile - 2 years ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2007

Dear chessmaster102,

Sorry, I could not reply to you for quite some time.I am  not too sure of the line you are referring to on account of your notation.However, here is the possible answer.

by chessmaster102 - 2 years ago
Detroit MI United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2451

I don't mean to be annoying but for the one if black play's 4...e6 can you explain the purpose of the higlighted move's because I don't see why black can't just capture e4 for (6...cxd5 7.e4 ) or why black can't just play  8...f6) 5...Qc7 7.Bf4?? since black can just capture with his Queen.

by chessbibliophile - 2 years ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2007

The point of 9.Ra4 is not to allow counterplay with...Nb4 and...Nc2+.Now white threatens e3 and Bxa6 winning a pawn. The whole idea is to show that Black's moves...Qb6 and...Na6 are going to be fatal to him.

by chessmaster102 - 2 years ago
Detroit MI United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2451

What's the purpose of 9.Ra4.

by chessbibliophile - 2 years ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2007

Dear friend,

 Let me see if I can use a seaparate diagram to answer your question.

by chessmaster102 - 2 years ago
Detroit MI United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2451

For the first example what would happen if black played 4...e6 instead. or (10.d4/Bf5) instead.

by pleasant - 2 years ago
leyden, ma United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 22

this 'simple' opening [in the zukertort version - which player / readers may well consider a totally diferent opening, except for the name 'colle' -- is extremely instructive; has a growing literature [T & D Hatch, The Dogs of War; David Rudel, Zuke 'em; videos by Polgar and Short and, below, say 2000 or so is an excellent [or TWO excellent opening[s] for one's repertoire.

by the way, [thet are / it is] not really so simple!

by madpawn - 2 years ago
London England
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 1039

Good to see how one may respond to black's Bf5. Thanks.

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.