In both games, you showed that developing the queen too early will allow one's opponent to take shots at it while developing and gaining control of the center. That's another chess fundamental.

I loved the discovered attacks and indeed an execllent queen sac. Well played, sir.

great sacrifices....

 

i agree with u develop ur pices fast

 

I love the Queen sac in the second game! And overall a real cutthroat sense of attack. Very nice, enjoyed these games very much.

It says one ting when you use the games of masters to illustrate a point, and one much different when your own games scream the lesson.  Way to go!

@Zenchess

That's true, but it's alsto true that less that 1% of the user on this site are top level players And I think that the qty of club level players here is also very low. Most of the users here are begginer/average players and one of the things they need to learn are the basics of chess. And one of this basics rules is to develop all your pieces.

I agree that this is not a "hard" rule. And it is broken in order to achieve other advantages in the game.

PS: HTRYC its a great book!!  

  In top level competition mere blind development of pieces is not the primary consideration.  See the book 'secrets of modern chess strategy: advances since nimzowitsch" for discussion and examples of when modern top-level players flout 'rules' of development regularly.  In fact there is a particularly interesting example (that I've posted here on chess.com) in which one side has a huge lead in development and still gets smashed.

    Developing pieces is important, but no modern top level player says that the goal of the opening is to 'develop all your pieces as rapidly as possible'.  Instead you can find in classic positional books like 'reassess your chess' that the goal of the opening is to achieve a favorable imbalance and guide the position towards one that favors your imbalance.  Development can be one of the imbalances, but there are many other types of them and development can be sacrificed for a long-term positional gain. 

 

In the first game, you developed your pieces so rapidly it almost seemed your opponent was standing still.  This game is a great example of the White's inherent advantage in moving first.

good exaples of attacking early if your opponent doesnt develop

millerthesmurf: Agree with you, maybe I should have said that Nd7 is the most common line.

on the first game u mentioned nd7 is the main line but there are A COUPLE of main lines for example you can take with the pawn on E then play g6 witch is my favourite line

Both games were turn-based games.

good games. i especially like the 2nd. could you say if they were played on LIVE? if not then blacks Qxc2 is an absolute disgrace lol.