Openings for Tactical Players: A Childhood Love

Submitted by GM Gserper on Sun, 09/13/2009 at 4:45am.

[Ed: this week, our daily columnists [may] have secretly traded columns. From this Sunday through Friday, read all the columns, and guess who wrote which. Mail your guesses to dpruess at chess.com. A couple prizes will be awarded at random to those with 6/6 correct answers.]

[This article was actually authored by WIM Iryna Zenyuk]

In our previous two articles we looked at how to win a game in a sharp style and quickly with white. Ok, when you have the white pieces you can afford a pawn sacrifice here and there, since you get an advantage in development. With black it is not so easy to win quickly… there are rather many infamous games of how to lose a game under 20 moves. There are not as many gambits with black as with white but there are many games that are pretty sharp and require strong nerves.

Today we will talk about an opening that many of us can call a ‘childhood love’. Why this name? When we learn chess at first this opening is very useful to play for beginners to develop tactical vision, dynamical sense, attacking possibilities and memory for storing all the variations. Thus, most of us who learned chess at an early age started off as having this opening as a main opening in our repertoire as Black. Can you guess what opening it is?.. Of course, the Sicilian Dragon! It was particularly popular a few decades ago when every game played at a high level featured an important novelty. Nowadays, it was played very rarely at the highest level until Carlsen and Radjabov picked it up. The Dragon is having its second youth. Of course, to play it one needs to know tons of theory and follow all the recent developments. But if you want a crowd of people gathering at your game because you just sacrificed rook and knight and possibly queen, then the Dragon is right for you! Of course you run a risk of getting mated in 20 moves if you make only one step in a wrong direction, but at least the torture will end quickly and you are not going to miss a football game on TV.

Lets go over a few tactical ideas. First of all, if Nc3 is not defended R:c3 should be performed on auto-pilot mode. Secondly, try to keep the h and g lines closed, even if your opponent offers pawn sacrifices there. If you get your rooks on the c file and Queen on a5 then you are in good shape. Keep an eye on the d5-break and of course pretty much any endgame will give you a good advantage due to your better pawn structure.

 

The previous example sets the mood for exchange sacrifices for the knights. Usually, it is only one on c3. The next one features knight maneuvers as well as pawn operations in the centre.

As one can see if white's attack does not work, and black closes the position, then black is in good shape. The next example has a destructive attack and shows the importance of active piece play.

In the next example, Black uses a tactical idea to save his game.

Playing a Dragon is a provocative action. It is like wearing red attire– you can be the highlight of a party, noticed by everyone as having taste for new trends in fashion, or a total loser who is desperate for attention.

» posted in Opening Theory
« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Comments:

by philtheforce - 3 months ago
bristol England
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 1111

one of the puzzles is nice where the queen takes the pawn and night cant capture queen because would be in check!

by philtheforce - 3 months ago
bristol England
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 1111

nice article and puzzles

by BaronDerKilt - 3 months ago
East of Omaha United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 436

WHAT? second youth!? Third youth at Least~! Laughing

First Fischer destroyed it his way. Called it "Easy". Then Karpov came along and made it completely unplayable, per the 2 wins vs Korchnoi in the 70's (and Chess Life & Review did an article on it based on those games, in 76 I believe, that just Smashed the mainline and every variant of it, pehaps Gligorics "Game of the month") . . After that it gets revived with not one but Two Soltis Variations ...the original, exchanging on d4 then playing ...b5. And Son of Soltis, playing ...h5. And the Stein Variation got play in the 80's. Names like Sosonko, Shamkovich, Szabo & Soltis were playing it even after Karpov, and yes, it lived again ... awhile anyway.

The 80's seemed to be a heyday for it. When I played in 3 of them in 8th USCCC with Expert+ level postal players, the theory overturned about 3 times in the course of those games! Loses, Draws, Wins, Draws by Perpetual, etc. I guess Volatile was the word of the time. When there was not yet a "Chinese Variation" nor Kasparov & Anand exploring the Dragon yet. Those two brought another great resurgence of interest.

[btw Of those three games above... One win, One Lose, One Draw. The loss being the only one with the White pieces. And in that Sherzer line Adams is trying to play with Bg5 too! Bad, BAD ... Try Bh6 GM :) ]

I think it a great opening for those who like to study and find new ideas for corr play. For blitz play, it is THE KILLER. In over 7000 blitz games online, I have yet NEVER had anyone replicate Karpovs play against the mainline. That makes it Safe for blitz. So lets see some Live Chess Dragons, okay?

Thanks for the article. I think it is an opening of everyones youth because it keeps getting "reborn" every generation Smile

by grumpyguru - 3 months ago
New York City United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 14

WIM Energia's articles usually have, to her credit, much more explanations.

by chessbibliophile - 3 months ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 929

NM GreenLaser's writing is carefully worded, the analysis accurate and up to date. Readers are always welcome to respond to his writings with criticism and constructive comment.

I do hope somebody does not get the wrong idea by the kind of suggestion made here.

by ishamael13 - 3 months ago
Alvin, TX United States
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 10

I could be wrong but the note made me think and wonder. This does not appear to be GM Serper's style. The sentences are not connected in the way I usually associate with this wondeful writer. Either is it a rushed article this time, which I don't believe personally, or else somebody else wrote it. Perhaps Green Laser?

by chessbibliophile - 3 months ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 929

Dear ozodi,

It is nice to see your interest in defence. Try to follow the games of Capablanca, Rubinstein and Smyslov.From modern times Petrosian, Kramnik and Anand. Petrosian's games have to be seen with a lot of discrimination.Otherwise one would acquire only the negative characteristics of his play.

by ozodi - 3 months ago
OMAHA NE United States
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 2

I like defensive syle of play. What GM is known to be the best in that?

by ozodi - 3 months ago
OMAHA NE United States
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 2

I like defensive style of play. Whose games should I watch?

by H2oh - 3 months ago
United States
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 48

Tough sacrifices. Wow. Tactics, Tactics .Tactics.

by aieplm - 3 months ago
manila Philippines
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 159

need more articles

by chessbibliophile - 3 months ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 929

The move 10...Rb8 was first played way back in 1957. Thereafter only a brief line 11.h4 Nd4 12.Bd5 b5 13.Bb3 a5 was mentioned in a 1964 article by Shaposhnikov and Ermenkov. The Belgian master Luc Henris offered some fresh analysis in New in Chess Yearbook 62.He was living in China with his Chinese wife at that time and christened it the Chinese Dragon.Later analysis of this variation appears in New in Chess Yearbook 71 and the recent Yearbook 91.

More info. on this Yearbook is here:

http://www.chess.com/article/view/new-in-chess-yearbook-91review )

The most regular source of information is the HomePage on Dragons in ChessPublishing.com.

http://www.chesspublishing.com/content/3/index.htm 

and its free forum:

http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?board=Dragons

by finamor - 3 months ago
Montreal Canada
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 34

I'm sure this one is not from GM Bhat because it's totally unclear. Not enough explanations! Maybe a good player, but a bad teacher. . .

by KarlRKaiser - 3 months ago
Orlando United States
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 3

Yes, I have to agree. I'm no master but I can't see a winning continuation in most of these and some look downright lost after the sac (like the last one).

by DecentGuy999 - 3 months ago
Egypt
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 23

Excuse me..These sacrifices look wonderful..but the Question that pops up to my mind is "then what??" I can't understand in many of the previous examples why white can't capture back?? I'm really confused..This article doesn't give sufficient explanation..or maybe it's directed to high rated players only??!

by MrFantasy - 3 months ago
Reggio Emilia Italy
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 101

thx for your topic

by michaels247 - 3 months ago
ne Israel
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 137

all positions not lead to anywhere , good to sacrifice pieces but what next this is low level

by cberman - 3 months ago
Maryland United States
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 188

Delightful games. I shall have to devote some time to this one.

by Dexman - 3 months ago
Houston United States
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 245

Excuse me, but what do "N", "/\", "EF#" and ">>" mean in the annotation?

I'm confused.Undecided

by WGM Natalia_Pogonina - 3 months ago
Saratov Russia
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 277

Hmm, I love the Dragon Laughing

And we even recently had a contest dedicated to it

« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.