Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Endgame Virtuoso

  • WIM energia
  • | Sep 30, 2011
  • | 8633 views
  • | 24 comments

I am holding a book called “Grandmaster Chess Strategy” by Jurgen Kaufeld and Guido Kern published by New In Chess in 2011. The book is a collection of Ulf Andersson’s games with excellent annotations by the authors. If you have not heard of Ulf Andersson I can assure you that he is a god of endgames. Going through the games of excellent endgame players should be part of your endgames study plan. However, one can be easily drowned in the bulky volumes of books published on great endgame players. Nowadays, it is not a matter of getting the information but rather of filtering it right. So, here we have a book with 80 games of Andersson; what should we do next? The chapters are classified by particular themes or material balance which is very helpful in the selection procedure. Going in detail through all the games would be ideal but here we are interested in a situation when you have only about 3-4 hours overall to dedicate to this book.

As the authors go through the games they give selected diagrams where you can stop and test your skills by answering their questions. I would not pay attention to particular theme as the themes can spoil the experience. For example, if you are reading a chapter on exchanges of bishop for knight then when solving the exercises you might be biased towards the exchange. Let us look at a few selected positions chosen randomly from the book.

"The natural (and certainly also the good) move would be 20. Rfc1, in order to occupy the c-file. White finds an unconventional move which will turn out to be very useful. How does White continue?"

 

 

The g4-move is a typical idea in all kinds of endgames. In many endgames having the h5-g6 structure is beneficial for black; with g4 white prevents this set-up. G4 also paralyzes the black kingside and makes room for the white king. It is interesting to note that Rfc1 is almost an automatic move, however Andersson waited with it as immediately pushing g4 is more important (black could have played h5 and stopped it). The continuation of the game is interesting, so it is worth continuing with the game.

“Find the decisive re-grouping which consolidates White’s clear positional advantage.”

 

 

To find the regrouping with the knight on d5 is hard for white because it takes 4 moves to get there and certainly black can find something to do over these four moves, right? Not really, because with previous moves white tied down the black forces and black cannot launch anything active because it would only speed-up the process.

The above example was from Chapter 1, let us move to the end chapter and choose an example from there. The example that I chose intrigued me because the question asks us to find a plan. And generally many players tend to think in specific moves rather than in terms of plans, so developing planning can help many.

“Work out a plan to gradually turn the white position into a winning one.”

 

 

The knight was placed perfectly: it blocked the c5-pawn, which blocked the bishop. From c4 it defended the b2-pawn and e5-pawn. The rook was not doing much, so Andersson found a way to activate his passive piece. Then, he improved the position to the maximum reaching the following position.

“Is White bogged down or can he still decisively strengthen his position?”

 

 

The rook transfer is unbelievable – there is no chance I could find it at the board. Usually, one would push the kingside pawns but in this situation the rook was not placed ideally on the a-file. Placing pieces on active squares should be a priority and only then one should improve the pawn formation. It seems that the position is still far from being winning, however after the game move black ends up in a hopeless position.

“White has a highly superior formation. Find the decisive move which leads to the win”.

 

 

It is hard to say where black went wrong in this game. Andersson showed once again a mastery of exploiting one weakness after the other, until black’s defense collapsed.

We looked at a few of Andersson’s endgames featured in the book “Grandmaster Chess Strategy” by Kaufeld and Kern. Even from these few examples you can see how well he played different kinds of endgames. Solving the positions outlined by the authors as you go through the book is a good way to improve your endgame technique. One thing that you probably will take from it, regardless of how much effort put is how to be patient in endgames as this theme reappears almost in all of Andersson’s endgames.

Comments


  • 3 years ago

    NM Petrosianic

    I am glad that you mentioned the book on Ulf Andersson's games because he is one of my favorite players and because there is scant literature so far as I am aware on his games.  Famous for losing few, drawing many, tenacious defense and for grinding out wins from limited material positions.  It was mentioned to me that he focused on square control in his analysis.  Perhaps he has fear of losing, or perhaps of playing inaccurately at long controls or so it has been rumored; in any case, it seems that long games take more energy out of him in tournaments these days.

  • 3 years ago

    g-levenfish

    Great article

  • 3 years ago

    loved

    thank you so much for this article, energia :)   I'm sure I will enjoy this book: I had been hoping Jeremy Silman would write a book like Pandolfini's Chess Solitaire but with endgames only. This one by Kaufeld & Kern will make a fine addition I'm sure to my endgame studies (as, of course, your many articles have).

  • 3 years ago

    Nikanadib

    good article

  • 3 years ago

    tcallah

    this picture is Janos Staker ?

  • 3 years ago

    franciskov85

    super chido

  • 3 years ago

    Telmo_Escobar

     This is what grandmaster Peter Leko writes in the preface of this nice book:

     

     "It gives me great pleasure to see that on one hand this work honurs the creative efforts of Andersson and on the other lays before the reader the most outstanding training material. I find it particularly important that subtleties are dealt with which will advance your future chess development: nowadays, people are too used to the opinion of computer programs, and every book that moves us to do some thinking by ourselves is an important supplement to that. This book opens our eyes to what really makes a world class chess player!".   

  • 3 years ago

    crossbow

    In (Andersson, U. vs. Quinteros, U.) game:

    Black has 2 obvious weaknesses in illustration #1. a.) After an exchange, he has 4 pawn islands, b.) he has 3 isolated pawns.

    -->Capablanca said, "keep harassing the enemy; force him to use his big pieces to defend Pawns. If he has a weak point, try to make it weaker, or create another weakness somewhere else and his position will collapse sooner or later. If he has a weakness, and he can get rid of it, make sure that you create another weakness somewhere else.

    So what can we expect from black??

  • 3 years ago

    Kinn72

    Just that one article is very instuctive, amazing systematic endgame technique.

  • 3 years ago

    SherlockHolmes94

    Wonderful

  • 3 years ago

    razmujin

    very nice games

  • 3 years ago

    rockpeter

    Ok you made me order the book :)

    Can't wait to get it.

  • 3 years ago

    umegard

    Ulf also was world top correspondence player, but has now quit that as it was to stressful for him. Hope to see him play in the big tournaments soon again!
  • 3 years ago

    PawnInTheGame

    BTW the guy with the cello is Janos Starker :P

  • 3 years ago

    Chess_Lover11

    Really man, unbelieveable!!! This guy is really "God of endgames"!

  • 3 years ago

    ChessisGood

    Nice endgames!

    I like the idea of playing g4, but I still think I'll stay away from the Grob...

  • 3 years ago

    Desafiante

    Wonderful! Thank you very much, chess friend!

  • 3 years ago

    jwalexander

    Wonderful article, very pleasing game to review.

  • 3 years ago

    ppita75

    Very good article, about a trully great player. The miniatures are all delicious.

    After reading the endgame virtuoso books of Anatoly Karpov's( a very good book of a master on the endgame) and Vassily Smyslov's( whose simplicity playing endgames like it was an easy task really atonished me), i will sure be waiting to read your book.

  • 3 years ago

    dran

    Anderson is genius... very imaginative endgame plan. hands down.

Back to Top

Post your reply: