^ Click here to remove ads! ^

Fischer-Spassky 1992 (Game 20)

Submitted by RookHouse on Tue, 07/15/2008 at 5:03am.

Boris Spassky won game 20 of his match against a seemingly passive Bobby Fischer.  After letting Spassky off the hook in their previous game and settling for a draw, it was widely expected that Fischer would come out very aggressive in this game.  This thought was immediately amplified when Spassky played 1.e4 for the first time in the match, enabling Fischer to deploy his vaunted Sicilian Defense.

Spassky optioned for the Closed System with 2.Ne2 Nf6 3.Nbc3.  Fischer responded with a solid defense, but one that did not seem poised for a sufficient counterattack.  Spassky’s advance of his g-pawn on moves 14 and 19 indicated right away that he was pressing for a kingside attack.  Fischer eventually sacrificed a pawn on move 23 in an attempt to break up Spassky’s solid center.  Spassky would eventually fortify his position with 28.Nd3.

After 31.Be3! Qh4 Spassky had both of Fischer’s rooks in a forked position and now had a winning rook for bishop ending.  Bobby would resign after white’s 41st move.  Fischer now leads the match by the score of 7 - 4.

 

 

 

 

 

For an account of the earlier games, visit www.rookhouse.com/blog and type in "fischer spassky 1992" in the search bar located on the right side.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also, be sure to check out my book review of "Carl Haffner's Love of the Draw" at http://www.rookhouse.com/blog/?p=270


» posted in Other
 

Comments:

by mpk2klang - 38 days ago
Sentosa OK Singapore
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 50

 WELL GOOD GAME


by jhuschstp - 41 days ago
St. Paul United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 84

kevinski- because of 31....Rxg5-- he would just trade queens and not get a rook


by Eli - 43 days ago
United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 13

Because 31... Rxg5.


by RookHouse - 45 days ago
Ohio United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 122
I think it's because the Queen exchange (31.Qxg5 Rxg5) at that point would ruin the planned fork and subsequent rook to bishop advantage for White in the endgame.
by kevinski - 45 days ago
TEXAS United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 12
move 30 why doesnt white take black queen with his queen?
by wdygml - 46 days ago
Delhi India
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 202
oooooooooooooooooo
 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.