Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Glimpse at the Urusov Gambit

Submitted by jk00750 on Tue, 03/10/2009 at 5:49pm.

The Urusov Gambit can prove to be a dangerous weapon to use against 2...Nf6 in the bishop's opening.  At the cost of a pawn can come a dangerous attack.  It is not as dangerous for white as the King's Gambit, itself.  The Urusov Gambit ensures a game full of tactics, and black will often find himself struggling to defend from attack.

The opening is shown below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now black has a number of responses.  For the sake of the article, I will present the two most common:

3...exd4

3...Nxe4?!

Nxe4 is the most natural response, but not the best.  Of course, Nc6 is an option for black, too.  Many books give Nxe4 as a sound response, but many modern chess players think white can give black a hastle.

3...Nxe4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now, let's take a look at 3...exd4.  This is a better response.  Although black wins a pawn, white wins an attack.  Good play by white here can give black major difficulties.  In this line, white gets a huge lead in development, a semi-open d-file and an open e-file on the black king.  White typically castles queenside in this line, although in chess, there are always exceptions to generalities.  If black isn't careful, he will fall victim to white's attack.  Careless play by black is punished by white's superior development and attack.  Below is one of my games as white where black played careless.  The game was less than 10 minutes.  Below is another game, also.  In fact, it is an old one.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There are several variations of this particular 3...exd4 line.  They are shown below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here, 9.Rhe1 can also be played, which is the old main line.  Below is one last game, a master game with the Urusov Gambit.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There are many who might be unwilling to 'give up a pawn' in the opening.  Playing material down can be nerve-racking if one lacks self-confidence.  But it is clear that one gains compensation for the pawn he has lost in these lines given white plays accurately.  Black will find it difficult to fend off the attack.  For all those who strive for lively, tactically complex, exciting games the Urusov Gambit should be considered.

Hopefully this article has given you a good first look at the Urusov Gambit.  If anyone has any suggestions to improve this article, I would be grateful to receive input.

» posted in Opening Theory
 

Comments:

by MarcazzarSmish - 4 months ago
London United Kingdom
Member Since: Jun 2011
Member Points: 1023

anyone?

by MarcazzarSmish - 4 months ago
London United Kingdom
Member Since: Jun 2011
Member Points: 1023

why in the jk00750 vs. NN game why not play h6 instead of be7? Is there some sort of trap cause there are no games where thats played on the game explorer and it seems like a pretty obvious move

by Gmonster - 8 months ago
United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 11

Hi - can you do an analysis with the Urusov against the Two Knights Defense?  1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nf6 3. d4 exd4 4. Nf3 Nc6 *

by Floyyd - 2 years ago
San Jose United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 960

I love this opening, and I'm enjoying this website: http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~goeller/urusov/index.html

I was reading the Wikipedia articles about the Bishop opening and also the Vienna game. In both articles you can read:

"Grandmaster Nick de Firmian, in the 14th edition of Modern Chess Openings concludes that the Bishop's Opening/Vienna game leads to equality with best play by both sides."

It always makes me rage when I read these kind of dog sh*t, yeah, right, whatever Nick. Most games lead to equality with best play by both sides, and hey, what about better/worse play? Pathetic.

Anyway, thank you so much for this article.

Cheers.

by sonty - 2 years ago
New Delhi India
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 49

Thank you for this article. This will help me to win games.

by TheChessNerd - 2 years ago
Alberta Canada
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 165

Good article!

by jk00750 - 2 years ago
Michigan United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 204

In the game Horowitz-NN, there is probably nothing truly obvious wrong with 11...h6.  In fact, it was probably better.

 

8...g6, trying to maintain the material advantage...hmmm....  Good question.  I'll have to research that a bit.

by Keon21 - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 7

Hey, nice article! I just have a couple questions:

In the Horowitz game, what is incorrect about 11...h6 instead of 11...NxG5?

Also, in the bookline after the Horowitz game, what is wrong with 8...g6 in order to keep the material edge. 8...dNe5 could be played later, couldn't it?  

by SkpVwls - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 254

Nice article, very informative. Thanks!

by chaitu321 - 2 years ago
hyd India
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 1

nice article

by Britneyfan - 2 years ago
Scotland
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 408

excellent article!

by Archaic71 - 2 years ago
Texas United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 853

I have been playing a quiet line of the bishops opening as my primary white opening for some time (3. d3).  I have been timidly picking over the urusov for a while but I may well be adding this to my arsenal against Nf3 now.  The fast development and ability to castle queenside would lead to some nice opportunities to storm if black castled kingside.  Thanks for a very well done article.

by Okami_master - 2 years ago
Cincinnati United States
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 29

Wow i enjoyed reading it i am favoriting thisSmile

by Mm40 - 2 years ago
Essex County, New Jersey United States
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 3717

Great article, excellent read. 5 stars, hope you make more like these Smile

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.