Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

The Art of Stealing (Part 2)

  • GM vbhat
  • | Dec 15, 2009
  • | 5556 views
  • | 19 comments

I don't work on my openings as much as I'm sure the very top GMs do (mostly because I have so many other areas of my game to work on), but I do try to spend some time every week looking at some opening line in depth.

Back in August, in preparation for the Montreal International, I had spent some time on the Semi-Tarrasch Defense in the Queen's Gambit Declined. The Semi-Tarrasch is not very popular these days, and I had never faced it before, but I wanted to look at it for a couple reasons: (1) there was a possibility of facing it in Montreal and (2) I had never really studied the typical patterns and ideas that arose in the very characteristic middlegames.

Probably the most famous game in the Semi-Tarrasch ever is Polugaevsky-Tal, USSR Championship 1969. Here's that game with some light notes:

Fast forward to November, when I had the white pieces against IM Leonid Gerzhoy. I wasn't quite sure what to expect from Gerzhoy, as while I had seen that he had played the Semi-Tarrasch to good effect a couple times, he seemed to favor the Nimzo Indian and Ragozin. As it was, he chose the Semi-Tarrasch and I had a chance to try and show what I had learned from my study back in August.

Question 1: What would you play for White after 18...h6?

Question 2: What would you play for White after 27...Re7?

Question 3: What would you play for White after 34...Bc8?

Here's the entire game in one viewer:

Comments


  • 3 years ago

    Evasan

    The game against Leonid was very nice! Thanks for the informative analysis. Does anyone know where I can download chessbase ebooks?

  • 3 years ago

    snakehandler

    Wicked!

  • 3 years ago

    dran

    Steal!!!

  • 3 years ago

    GM vbhat

    He played 20...Kg7 to guard the h6-pawn. Something like 20...Nb2 would be nice in theory, but then 21.Qxh6 Nxd1 22.Ng5 forces the win of the queen (or checkmate).

    He could have tried 20...h5 as well to guard the pawn, but then he gives White the g5-square, which could be quite useful for him. Something like 21.e6 Qf6 22.exf7 Qxf7 23.Qg3 (hitting g6) Kg7 24.Ng5 and 25.Ne6+ would win material for White.

  • 3 years ago

    White-Gryphon

    why did black move his king to 20...Kg7 on "What would you play for White after 18...h6?" was that his best move? seems like he is trying to buy time....is there another better move for black?

  • 3 years ago

    IM Nezhmet

    Ponomariov had very interesting analysis on this line in a recent NIC magazine, where he had to face the variation when Paco Vallejo whipped it out.

     

    In the Pono game, at a key moment, Paco actually could have justified his setup and equalized but went wrong and lost prosaically.

  • 3 years ago

    RHoudini

    Another interesting game and well-written article, thanks!

  • 3 years ago

    ericycsong

    great

  • 3 years ago

    GM vbhat

    Hey guys, thanks for the comments. As for 19.Bxc4 (I think that's what you meant instead of 19.Bxc6?), the problem is that Black plays 19...Rxc4 as Zibanzo pointed out. There's still a pin on the d-file, but to take advantage of it, you have have to give your Q for the R before getting Black's Q for your R, so in the end, it's just a massive trade of pieces. Since Black is up a pawn and defending against an attack before all those trades, this doesn't really favor White.

    CChess18 - thanks for pointing that out! I set the start/end points on that one incorrectly. I'll fix it now.

  • 3 years ago

    Zibanzo

    Redbaron, 19 Bxc6 doesn't work because of Rxc6. after 20 Qxc6 d5xc6 21 Rxd8 Rxd8 material is even but white's position is much worse and black's is better. Black has an advanced passed pawn, bishop with open diagnol, and rook on open c file. Even if 19 Bxc6 Rxc6 is met with something like 20 Nd5 or Rd5, black can just retreat and white loses his much better bishop for black's terrible knight. Qf5 was my guess. Black HAS to advance his pawn (weakening his kingside) to stave off a mating threat.

  • 3 years ago

    NOLAUPT

    thought hard on it i just dont know this one.

  • 3 years ago

    sryiwannadraw

    goot article

  • 3 years ago

    chess_stupidity

    question 2 board moves and question 3 board moves r the same!! Tongue out

  • 3 years ago

    FM charlesgalofre

    thank you, nice insight into the semi

  • 3 years ago

    redbaron2500

    why not 19 Bxc6? either up a piece or end up trading into queen and rook vs two rooks, right?

  • 3 years ago

    52A

    Thanks these articles have improved my game awareness, and increased my blitz rating

  • 3 years ago

    annamsudhakar

    Very interesting game and good tactically defended at 36 rf7+

  • 3 years ago

    kombeville

    mmmh, let's play tabletennis:)

Back to Top

Post your reply: