Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

How good is your chess?:Part I

Submitted by chessbibliophile on Thu, 09/10/2009 at 5:31am.

We live in a world of numbers.For many of us the GM rating is a magic figure that we cannot dream of. So a grandmaster who has attained that status is a rare human being. He sees and understands everything about the position.Now that is a contradictory statement. If he sees and understands everything, how does he lose a game?We all tend to forget that a grandmaster is also human, and it can be terrible for him to enter a mortal combat day after day in a gladiator contest.

Away from the tournament table, a grandmaster may be a friendly figure, and you can join him in a game of analysis. Who knows, if you are sharp, you may even find a better move than him.

So here is a test of 10 positions. It is interesting to note that the assessment of  quite a few positions here changed because the kibitzers found something new.Who knows what you may find? It may  also change everything. In that case you deserve a trophy.

 In this part there are 5 questions.Note that Positions, 1, 2 and 3 are not the usual White to play and win or Black to win variety.What you have to do is just to find the right idea with a few moves in the opening. Positions No. 4 and 5 feature combinations you may not have seen before.Each question carries two points.Enjoy!

Q.NO.1

This position was reached in a grandmaster game and Black played the obvious move, 9...Bf6.Although he won, he was reproaching himself for having entered this line with so many murky complications. Imagine that you are Black. How would you improve on his play?


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Q.No.2

This position was seen in the 3rd and 5th Games of the Anand-Kramnik World Championship Match, Bonn 2008. Here Kramnik refrained from playing the obvious 13.Nxd4.What would you have played if you had to face 13.Nxd4? Remember,this was the variation that decided the World Championship.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Q.No.3

This is a standard position in the King’s Indian. For quite some time 13.c5 has been abandoned by White on account of a sharp counter by Black. Would you spot it for yourself?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Q.No.4

 Here is a position from the analysis of a famous classic. Once upon a time 16…Rf7 was suggested as a reasonable alternative for Black. But this also fails to a beautiful variation.Can you find the combination?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 Q.No.5

Here is a miniature of an opening variation that even grandmasters may not know about. It is an inspired creation of Wilhem Steinitz, the First World Champion. Can you see the finish?


 

 


 

 

 

 

Here is the Link to the second part of the test:

http://www.chess.com/article/view/how-good-is-your-chess-part-ii

» posted in Opening Theory
 

Comments:

by chessbibliophile - 19 months ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2007

Dear friend,

Thank you for the comment. But I am anxious to prevent the kind of mishap you have had. Do check the web site chesspublishing.com

www.chesspublishing.com

and my monthly updates on the same.They appear here under the title, What is new in theory?

Similarly have a look at NicBase:

http://www.newinchess.com/NICBase/

I think both the sites would help in updating your repertoire.

by Petrosianic - 19 months ago
Allentown, PA United States
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 372

Position #3 came up in one of my OTB games last weekend (I had Black).  Now if only had I read this article a few days earlier, I would have played better!  I enjoyed this article.

by chessbibliophile - 2 years ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2007

Dear friend,

Thank you for the suggestion.

 If it helps the solver,why not?

by bugoobiga - 2 years ago
garden grove United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 575

if it's 'black to move', then please flip the board.

by chessbibliophile - 2 years ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2007

Dear friends,

 

Glad to see your comments. There was a wrong transposition of moves in the first postion that has been corrected.After 12.Qxc4 Black plays first ..d6, and then only 0-0.I would like to thank our friend, lostgalaxy for bringing it to my notice.

 

On the first three questions:Yes, you can explore other options on your own.

                                                 But do check it with existing theory.

                                                 If you have specific variations of your own,

                                                  you may post them here.Let us see them together.

 

Now I shall offer some links to the theory of these positions.

 

1)The Italian Game or the Giuoco Piano

In my annotations to the Steinitz game I have summed up all the main lines.

You would find a very good discussion of the opening

 in Tim Harding's November 2006 article.

http://www.chess.com/article/view/the-steinitz-immortal-revisited

http://www.chesscafe.com/archives/archives.htm

 

2)The Meran Variation of the SemiSlav Defence

http://www.chess.com/article/view/new-in-chess-yearbook-89review

 

3)The Bayonet Attack against the King’s Indian

You would find the article very long.

But do check the game Cheparinov-Radjabov 2008.

http://www.chess.com/article/view/chesspublishingcom-reviewpart-ii

 

In Position No.4, I have offered the shortest and clearest route to the winning line.

Yes, it is the same game, Steinitz-Von Bardeleben 1895.

Position No. 5 is straightforward, and I think there is not much disagreement.

I hope you would like solving the second part of the test.

by lostgalaxy - 2 years ago
Ho Chi Minh City Vietnam
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 342

In the first one what about 13.d6+

by saldy - 2 years ago
Thailand
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 68

A very intructive article.  I will certainly get back to this.

by Otok - 2 years ago
Nashville United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 15

I found this to be very thought provoking and though I tried to make different moves, it forced me to see others I may not of thought of otherwise.  Thanks!

by III_Seraph_III - 2 years ago
Amstelveen Netherlands
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 48

hmm the bad thing about the puzzle is it only lets you play the specified move while there are multiple valid possibilities so its more like finding out what other people played.

by MikeRoesell - 2 years ago
Crete, IL United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 300

I liked this alot.  thanks for the article

by ApexOfDE - 2 years ago
Vietnam
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 33

very helpful!

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.