How the Best Handle their Queens

Submitted by WIM energia on Fri, 09/04/2009 at 2:25am.

What is a chess genius?  I cannot answer this question but I can give examples of the play of a chess genius. I came from the country where no one questioned whether this person is a genius or not; it was accepted he is.  The games that I will present feature queen sacrifices by him. This is just a small example of his creativity.  There are many creative, orthodox, fearless chess players but not many of them reach the elite. Ivanchuk for 20 years has held his position among the top players in the world, his list of wins of international tournaments is numerous. The most recent example is Jermuk 2009. His ideas are tested on the highest level and prove to be correct. People say he is eccentric, that he lives on his own planet, Anand says that “Every day is a surprise with him.”

The first game is from 1987, more than 20 years ago! Let’s first evaluate the position. White is clearly better due to an advantage in space.  D6 is a target and the queen and rook attack it already. White has a strong h5 pawn, which pressures the black kingside. If it advances the knight on f6 will be hanging.  Black's plan might be to play Bc6 and d5, getting rid of the weakness on d6 and grabbing some space.

The position is fresh out of the opening. Ivanchuk still needs two tempi to castle. White has a mobile pawn center, while black took some space on the queenside. Black's idea would be to play either c5 or e5 at some point to undermine the strong white center.  But one has to be careful of opening the position here, remember that black is behind in development and might come under attack. Ivanchuk calculated a long more or less forced line that leads to the advantage of black, but to see the whole line in one’s head is not an easy task because the solution is  unorthodox and creative. Try to find it by yourself before looking at the game.

The next example features a position from the Queen's Indian Defense. The pin on d2 is unpleasant for white. Black has two pieces attacking Nd2. There are also some tactics involved on the long diagonal h1-a8. Black’s last move was to castle. He is ready to support his central knight. Black will be better in the normal course of the game. Ivanchuk does not want to settle for a worse position with white and finds a move that makes things complicated. This strategy is good from a psychological point of view. Black already is in the mood of playing a peaceful position with a slight edge that will go into a long fight. Suddenly, white changes the pace of the game and black may have a bigger advantage but he has to work his full 100% to prove it. And it is not easy for humans... Don’t try this against comps !

 

If you search the database, there are tons of games of Ivanchuk where he plays without a queen. The next example is from a game against Topalov, another paragon of creativity. This was a blitz game so some heavy mistakes are possible. In blitz one is guided more by intuition and also one does not need to care about rating and the games do not carry the importance of the real game so there are more interesting and creative ideas.  With the last move c4 black threatens to win the e4-pawn after white queen moves away.

So, we looked at some examples of Ivanchuk’s handling of queen exchanges for a couple of pieces. One can notice that many decisions carry a psychological character- the opponents lose track of the game as it was in Topalov’s game for example. A queen sac fora couple of pieces is a great defensive resource when one can choose between playing an inferior position down a pawn and no counterplay or sacrificing a queen but having some counterplay. One has to think outside the box when coming up with queen sacrifices, to go against stereotypes, to cross the boundaries… and sometimes this is where the truth to the solution of chess problems lies. And if it is there, then correctly solving chess positions one also gets the aesthetic pleasure from the solution. I hope Ivanchuk’s examples would be an inspiration for you.

 

» posted in Middlegame
« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Comments:

by quantum_mechanics123 - 2 months ago
Calgary Canada
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 89

Thanks for talking about queen exchange I really have trouble with that. Although these kinds of position rarely come up in my game (or maybe I didn't see it), it is still very useful for me.

It is awesome how Ivanchuk could sacrifice like that in the blitz game...it's kinds of like giving up 2 pawns with some initiatives. I totally fail at positional sacrifice and if it were me i would probably be like "shit, i messed up and start playing badly.

by madpawn - 3 months ago
London England
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 721

WIM Energia, you can never get it wrong for me. I have learnt so much from your articles I await them with baited breath. Please continue to submit these articles.

by demetrios18 - 3 months ago
new york United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 504

Explain Queen vs Queen end game and position because it can be very difficult to analyize. Computers analyize it as a draw but I think you can win but dont know how to play it out because I dont have much expierence in it because it rarley comes up in my games, Maybe once a year or so.

by kenneth67 - 3 months ago
res. South Africa Scotland
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 67

Fascinating - thank you!

Shows you how to be creative and fearless, but this of course requires totally precise calculation. I will be following Ivanchuk's games from now on.

by TrinityX - 3 months ago
Lagos Nigeria
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 3

encouraging...

by waynepacific - 4 months ago
Malibu, California United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 21

Scary. Ivanchuk would make me think five times before every move and then I would cringe as I made the move.

by fireballz - 4 months ago
marz South Africa
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 87

haha, i got the queen sacrifice right!Smile Thanks to this article. I also enjoy sacrifice pieces, and had noticed that you can gain some material, before thngs balance again...only i take chances, and sometime it pay off...but sacrifice like this!!!! its damn scary!, and im just a spectator, haha

by Precessional_Groove - 4 months ago
Western United States
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 77

I would have like to have seen all the moves in these games from the very opening moves .. to the situation presented ... and on through to its conclusion.

It's difficult sometimes to see how a chess player gets into a situation, and just as well as, it makes it difficult to see how they might get out of that situation without seeing the prevailing causes, or previous moves played out.

Interesting article though.

by Terlimone - 4 months ago
Tienen Belgium
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 85

This is a very good article. It shows how much I still have to learn. Losing the queen is for me never an opportunity, because it still gives me a psychological uppercut in this stadium of the game. I learn here that don't dare to give up the queen for big majority in other pieces and in pawns cost me already a lot of games. I remarked that now watching the games in the article. There is a trap in it thinking I can try this out... because in every game there is a moment where the moves are not taken with the same concentration... so a loss it definetely the first possibility. But I am Ivanchuk neither.

by ConradPlacebo - 4 months ago
Leeds United Kingdom
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 51

Great article, thanks

by gsorita - 4 months ago
Philippines
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 102

great !!!

by aieplm - 4 months ago
manila Philippines
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 159

its a great game!!!

by jpd303 - 4 months ago
west virginia United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 1564

chucky is my favorite contemporary player.  the phrase "what the hell was that" is probably uttered by his opponents quite often!  love the games, excellent article

by Gary_Seven - 4 months ago
Columbia United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 750

After move 49,I can see why that game ended at that move. Genius,yes,but for who is a genius? Who is a chess genius,the answer is still;"no solution."

by Rico7 - 4 months ago
Washington United States
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 20

very interesting games. losing the queen forces one to be creative and rise to the occasion. there some games i have won without the queen as so have allot of other players. it is important to practice playing without the queen. it forces a player to be creative with the other pieces and not be so dependant on the powerful queen.

thx for posting these great games

by lighthouse - 4 months ago
amsterdam International
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 265

Thank you , fresh way off looking ,

great MOVES, so much to learn ,

chess as ART.,,,,,

by idosheepallnight - 4 months ago
United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 1772

Ivanchuck is my favorite player of all time. During a game he seldom looks at the board. He is awesome.

by Prathikshena - 4 months ago
Johor Bharu Malaysia
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 144

always knew that he is one of the all time best players...

by RC_Woods - 4 months ago
Nijmegen Netherlands
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 574

TomMac19:

"thanks for posting that game...karjakin waqs totally outplayed- which is rare to see at the top level! was great to view- i wonder what Fritz would make of the queen sac??"

I checked it with Fritz 10. Totally unbelievable: the queen sac was completely sound, albeit not the very best move. (equality vs a minor (0,5 pawn) advantage for black).

After Karjakin played Qxe4? Ivanchuck was winning. (+- 1,4). Truly amazing. (Karjakin should have played Qxg5 maintaining a small advantage.)

by homosapien15 - 4 months ago
Nebraska United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 75

He certainly sees the game differently than most of the masters.  His ability to calculate must be truly incredible to be able to simply drop a Queen and often many other minor pieces knowing that he'll balance it out with some sort of other advantage (i.e. 5 pawns, Knight, Rook vs 2 Rooks)

« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.