Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

How to convert a positional and material advantage in endgames?

  • IM mat_kolosowski
  • | Aug 6, 2013
  • | 5287 views
  • | 12 comments

How to win a won game?

This is probably one of the most difficult skills that a chess player has to master in order to be able to collect points confidently. The answer to the question asked in the title lays in the player's ability to convert an advantage which he already obtained. The purpose of this article is to deliver both theoretical principles of how to deal with those "won" positions and provide instructive examples.

Converting the advantage is a highly important skill for any chess player. Unfortunately, it cannot be achieved easily but it's worth to take the effort to train this ability. There are various reasons for the mistakes being made as far as redeeming the advantage in endgames is concerned. They can be caused by factors such as: lack of fitness, tiredness etc, but mostly it's all about the lack of endgame technique.

One of the ways to improve the technique is connected with analysing classical games of players such as: Lasker, Rubinstein, Capablanca or Karpov. Nevertheless, there are some gold principles which will lead you closer to perfect endgame technique:



1. The Plan - schematic thinking. Creating step-by-step plans that lead to eventual success make playing the game easier. Apart from methodology, it has a great psychological effect because we don't concentrate on winning a difficult position but on something which is close at hand (e.g. creating a passed pawn).

2. Exchange - When there are not many pieces left on the board, every exchange counts. It's extremely important to consider your exchanges carefully as there's no time and possibility to obtain compensation. Consequences are severe!

3. Restricting your opponent's possibilities (to maximum) - Every single player should master the art of prophylactical thinking. Even the smallest sign of activity should be put down immediately. It's one of the most important rules.

4. No rush! - When redeeming the advantage, it's crucial to remain calm and play solid chess even if other possibilities are more tempting. We should consider all of the possbile options and before undertaking any measures that drastically change the situation on the board, improve our own position at most. "No rush" doesn't mean unnecessary loss of time. On contrary, every single tempo counts.

5. Two weaknesses rule - If our opponent is pushed into defence, the play should be conducted on the whole board. Creating new weaknesses, problems and attacking them alternately.

6. Transformation of the advantage - It's a rare situation when there's only one type of an advantage during the endgame. Chess is a dynamic game and in most cases it's beneficial to change one type of the advantage to another one (e.g. sacrifice an exchange in order to queen the pawn).

Shall we turn into practice?



Hopefully, the above-mentioned examples will help you in understanding how to to redeem the advantage in endgames and inspire you to work on this apect of the king's game in the future. The outcome should prove very effective not only in terms of endgame skills but also in positional chess and strategy.



Comments


  • 2 months ago

    koravi

    nice

  • 14 months ago

    vishmika

    thank u so much!111

  • 15 months ago

    XMagnet

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 15 months ago

    XMagnet

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 15 months ago

    knight_furyy

    fisher rocks man !!!

  • 15 months ago

    Aegipto

    That expression means that if you have a black squared bishop and you put your two passed pawns in black squares (for instance e5 and f4) the king will be able to block them and you wont be able to force the king to move away with the bishop with a check. In the opposite case, if your pawns are in f5 and e4 and your bishop is black squared the king wont be able to block your pawns in the same way.

  • 15 months ago

    anuana

    Can  sm1 Please elaborate  on these comments on move #36 in  the 3 rd Example game above (Alekhine):

    This move becomes easy to understand when we realise that the pawns are harmless when: 1) They're on the squares of the same colour as the bishop - the king will become a blocking piece

    Thx-Anand

  • 15 months ago

    M_A_T_I_N

    thanks

  • 15 months ago

    Helpmaster

    GREAT ONE 

  • 15 months ago

    morgondag

    The tablebase defenses with the R separated from the K are very difficult to find. In practice any amateur (maybee even master) who tries it will soon get the R forked or skewered. In practical play I think I have always won Q vs R endgames exept when if run out of time. 

  • 15 months ago

    Elubas

    The best part of that philidor study is that queen vs rook is a beast all its own Laughing. And to think I would have to do all that technique just to get to queen vs rook, a position I probably wouldn't win anyway!

    Although to be fair, queen vs rook is probably a lot easier to win if black doesn't defend properly, and in a practical game perhaps the vast majority of players would make it easier.

Back to Top

Post your reply: