I Should Bottle This Attack And Sell It

Submitted by spassky on Wed, 07/29/2009 at 9:41am.

I wrote an article called "Learning By Induction", the main point of which was that a player could learn chess better by playing through the games of strong players and extracting for himself the lessons contained within them (inductive reasoning) rather than someone else telling you what to do in this or that situation, resulting in your head being full of a bunch of unrelated facts all out of context, which are hard to remember and apply (deductive reasoning).  As an illustration of this, I present two new (i.e. not previously posted) games, as well as one game (previously unannotated) from an article I wrote called "There is Nothing New Under the Sun"  (www.brucetill.com/Test/wp/blog/?p=7).  I would like you to examine and compare the position of the first game after 13...d5 with the position of the second game after 17...Ne7 and the position of the third game after 15...cxd6 and see if you can extract any similarities amongst the three positions, especially with regard to the Black side.

That attack came out of a sharp line in the Ruy Lopez.  The next comes from a nearly symmetrical position in the King's Indian Defense.

The next attack comes from a classical King's Indian setup.  In the article mentioned above, this game went along lines almost identical to Taimanov-Najdorf, Zurich, 1953, which was awarded the brilliancy prize in that tournament.
In all three games, what common features did you extract?  How about Black's pawn chain pointing to White's kingside?  How about the half-open f-file?   How about the transfer of pieces by Black to the kingside?  How about the removal of all three pawns in front of the White king?  How about Black's disregard for material and focus on speed and attack, trying not to play a single unnecessary move?  If you were able to learn these lessons "by induction", then you can learn a lot more on your own by playing over master game collections in books.  I would recommend Morphy and Alekhine myself.  They were both great attackers, and as we all know, attack is much easier than defense.  For more games and coaching, visit www.brucetill.com .

» posted in Strategy
 

Comments:

by HAWKEYEMASTER - 2 months ago
NORTH CAROLINA United States
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 3

Great games and commentary I believe there were good lesson to use and absorb for future challenges thanks..

by 1wa - 2 months ago
Inglewood, CA United States
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 67

Good read. Thanks for the insight.

by spassky - 2 months ago
Gaithersburg, MD United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 296

To zankfrappa:

The pawn push f4-f5 for White (or f5-f4 for Black) is usually an aggressive move, and, since "fortune favors the brave", it often leads to a good result.  From a development standpoint, it closes the center, which is a prerequisite for an attack, it opens the queen bishop's diagonal towards the opposing king, and it closes the diagonal for its opposite number.  All of these elements favor the attacker, which is usually me, since I don't play for draws from either side of the board.  Since I play amateurs, I can afford to be aggressive (even speculative) knowing my opponents will find the correct move or sequence less than 50% of the time, plus, they tend to get flustered (scared) when attacked.  Pros play for draws with Black because, with their professional level opposition, it would backfire more than it would payoff to get very aggressive with Black.  To draw an analogy to golf, when the hole is near a hazard (water or sand or trees), it doesn't pay to be "brave" and "shoot at the flag" because the upside (a chance at a birdie or eagle) is not worth the downside (a double or triple bogey).  So most pros just shoot for the fat (safe) part of the green and hope for a good bounce or roll towards the hole and maybe rolling in a long putt. 

As for the 3rd and 6th ranks, all I can say is that a pawn close to the opposing king often covers some critical squares and is often as good as a piece during an attack.

by zankfrappa - 2 months ago
Virginia United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 2795

     Why does that f5-f4 theme for black keep working for you in so many
of your games?  I am surprised it works against such good players, as usually
black plays for a draw at the higher levels of chess.
     I am certainly going to experiment with that move.  Fischer made a
living of the f4-f5 move for white, so it makes me wonder if
the kingside 3rd and 6th ranks are not the most crucial area of the board
to control.

by Kaonashi - 4 months ago
Nieuwegein Netherlands
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 71

Wow. Great games, excellent examples. It demonstrates that it pays to attack, as long as you don't let the opponents moves distract you from your goal. I have a hard time improving my mediocre-at-best play, that's one the main reasons... I'll study these examples furthermore.

Thanks Spassky!

by animecrazy628 - 4 months ago
Connecticut United States
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 400

You have the most fun to read and informative articles on this site, thank you for posting such great games and lessons!

by shcp - 4 months ago
chicago United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 142

fascinating games

by alchemarchaic - 4 months ago
United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 21

great article ftw! thanks!

and great title btw, lolzorz.

by tushu - 4 months ago
Dhaka Bangladesh
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 5235

great games. your commentary is amazing as well.

by flamethro274 - 4 months ago
St Louis, Missouri United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 142

Str8 up tore them to pieces!

by chhatch - 4 months ago
Tennessee United States
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 56

Wonderful. I would have slowed my attack to answer every one of white's petty threats on the queenside.

by HimanshuSinghal - 4 months ago
Ambala India
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 34

gr8 games

by Knightguy - 4 months ago
Indiana United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 1372

I might point out the very strong light square Bishop pointing to the enemy King still on its home square, indirectly developed.

Thanks Bruce, nice lesson I will try to take to heart.

by Anatoly_Sergievsky - 4 months ago
Broadway United States
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 163

Keep writing- your articles are always fun to read. Good stuff....

by hyperniko - 4 months ago
Texas United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 150

The obvious of course are the pawn-center chains, which divide King and Queen's wings. Black pieces are aiming on King side attack, but white attacking counterly on the queen side. We see that when Black got first on his goal white defense colapse because other pieces are on the other side and it's too late to get back on defense.

by shuttlechess92 - 4 months ago
California United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 1905

the 3rd game was the best.

just curious - how would the attack have played out after 23. Nxa8?

by Evenfall - 4 months ago
Belgium
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 4

Well, that was interesting!

by Omicron - 4 months ago
Buenos Aires Argentina
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 202

Very interesting, thanx for the article. I hope to read more of you.

by Mpr0733 - 4 months ago
Eindhoven Netherlands
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 9

Thanks Bruce.Always glad to see you post another article.

by peterwaffles - 4 months ago
Fortress of Solitude Panama
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 653

this is fantastic. Thanks!

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.