King Safety Trumps Theory

Submitted by spassky on Thu, 07/02/2009 at 10:58pm.

Sometimes openings have certain positional or thematic goals that they wish to accomplish.  For example, in the King's Gambit (1.e4 e5  2. f4), one of the primary goals for White is to open the f-file and get play against the square f7 with a rook on f1, a bishop on c4, and perhaps a knight on g5.  In the following game, Black plays the Sveshnikov Variation of the Sicilian Defense, a sharp, modern line with its roots in the Boleslavsky and Lasker-Pelikan lines.  Black accepts some positional defects (weak d5 square and backward pawn on d6) in return for a stake in the center (e5) and the thematic pawn push, f5.  Some of these theoretical ideas come with unspoken caveats, such as "Try to play ...f5 (as long as your king is safely castled or at least your e-pawn is still on the board closing the e-file)".  Sometimes players forget about these small details and march ahead blindly towards their thematic goals.  They do so at their own peril.

The lesson here?  King safety has to become second nature to you.  You have to develop a feel for it.  You have to have a sense that things are opening up in the center and your king can't stay there another moment, even if you can't calculate an exact sequence that threatens your king.  Players in many sports develop this sixth sense for safety (say that 3 times fast!).  Football quarterbacks know that, when dropping back to pass, you can only hold the ball for so long (probably 5 seconds at most) before you have to throw a pass to someone or throw it away out of bounds.  Trying to be a hero and "make something happen" may work sometimes, but more often than not ends in disaster (a sack and fumble or interception).  Baseball players have to learn how big a lead they can take off of first base or whether they can stretch a single into a double or steal a base.  There are examples in all sports. 
The player of the Black pieces was no beginner, but even he failed to feel the danger to his king.  Beginners, of course, succumb to attacks on their kings in the center all the time.  They just do not see the benefit of "wasting" a move castling when they could be running around with other pieces (often the Queen) "doing" something.  I believe a sense of king safety is more highly developed in players who like to conduct kingside attacks.  That is, since they are always reaping the benefits of their opponent's unguarded kings, they have a feel for when their own king is getting near that situation.  If you find that you don't have this feel for king safety, then just play it safe and castle as soon as you legally can in each game.  Your king will thank you.  Go to www.brucetill.com to see more of my games and tips.

» posted in Opening Theory
 

Comments:

by pmrichard_93 - 37 days ago
CT United States
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 18

nice show

by spassky - 2 months ago
Gaithersburg, MD United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 258

To schara:

Even though 9...gxf6 precludes Black from castling on the kingside, it was forced, because he has to recapture or he's a piece down, and if he plays 9...Qxf6, then White plays 10. Nxd6+ Bxd6  11. Qxd6 Rd8 12. Qc5 and Black is a pawn down and still can't castle.  Besides, 9..gxf6 is standard in this opening, as Black tries to play ....f5, trading his f-pawn for White's e-pawn, leaving him with a 2-0 pawn advantage in the center and play down the half-open g-file for the rook.  The Sveshnikov Sicilian is a very sharp opening for Black and he has to be willing to make some positional concessions (like ...e5 giving away the square d5 to White and ...gxf6 compromising his kingside pawn structure and thereby his king's safety) in order to obtain sharp play and a central advantage.  You really have to know what you are doing (i.e. be booked up) to be able to play this opening, or else you end up like Black in this game.

by schara - 2 months ago
los angeles United States
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 3

gxf6...was, in this game, a bad continuation because his king IS stuck in the middle hidding behind his pawns...

by mattDearle - 3 months ago
Vancouver Canada
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 72

good show!

by spassky - 4 months ago
Gaithersburg, MD United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 258

To Babarberousse:

Thank you for your comments.  You are correct in saying 8...a6 would have been a stronger defense than 8...Be6.  I am guessing that he did not play that because he is unfamiliar with the main line of the opening.  Remember, we reached that position by transposition.  If he had wanted to play that opening, he would have played 5...e5 right away.  So I may have tricked him into it somewhat.  On the other hand, if one is going to play 5...e6, he should be ready for such a transposition and have at least a passing familiarity with the main line.  And. of course, opening the e-file for me was disasterous.  At least he only suffered another 5 moves.

by Babarberousse - 4 months ago
Paris France
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 8

I think your game could very well illustrate an article we could call "how should you NOT play the sveshnikov".

8.... Be6 is a weak move which you gave the right answer to (9.Nd5). Black should really have played 8. ... a6, sticking with the main line, in order to get your Nb5 out of play on a3 and to let you struggle a bit more for the d5 square.

then 16. ... exf4 followed by f5 is probably the other biggest mistake as it loses the strong e5 pawn and lets you open the e file where the black king still stands...

by Mrki - 4 months ago
Belgrade Serbia
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 52

@ Jaguarphd : you have some issues, get some help.

by stopthetrigger - 4 months ago
Bristol United Kingdom
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 19

Great game

by avgplayer - 4 months ago
Ohio United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 9

Thank you for this article.  Enjoyable game and informative text.

by saldy - 4 months ago
Santa Rosa, Laguna Philippines
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 65

The game is as entertaining as the article.  a very creative attacking play.

by Knightguy - 4 months ago
Indiana United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 1228

Nice article and I appreciate the game presented to illustrate your point.  It is all to often easy for me to overlook my King sometimes in the heat of an attack, or defense, to my dismay I have learned this lesson more than once.

by Jaguarphd - 4 months ago
California United States
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 649

yeah, saying horse as opposed to not bothers me too. Even worse so is saying "eat" as it is called capturing. Whoever says eat is stupid. I don't care if some masters say it. Its capturing.

by KriptikMike - 4 months ago
Elk Grove, CA United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 156

Didn't you read the annotations? If the Knight takes the Queen, then Rc4 is checkmate. And please don't call the Knight a horse. It bothers me.

by Marvin2 - 4 months ago
Sydney Australia
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 243

couldn't the horse just eat the queen. 

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.