Lasker's worst loss

Submitted by billwall on Fri, 08/14/2009 at 5:57pm.

On November 26, 1892, future world chess champion (from 1894 to 1921) Emanuel Lasker (1868-1941), age 23,  gave a simultaneous exhibiton in Quebec, Canada.  There were 18 players.  He won 15 games, drew 2 games, and lost one game to Nicholas Macleod, age 22.  He didn't just lose.  He got checkmated by two queens.  Lasker refused to resign when his opponent was up two queens.  And it wasn't just an amateur chess player that he could swindle.  Nicholas MacLeod (1870-1965) was a child prodigy in chess.  He took 1st place in the Canadian chess championship in 1886 (at age 16, the youngest Canadian champion ever), 1887, and 1888.  He was the Minnesota champion in 1899.  He won the 2nd Western Chess Association (later called the U.S. Open) in 1901.  His one bad claim to chess fame was his world record loss of 31 games in one tournament (6th American Chess Congress, New York, in 1889).  He did win 6 games and drew one in that event, but took 20th (last) place as a 19 year old.  Lasker missed several chances to win this game, then draw the game, and finally allowed his opponent to queen his two pawns and was mated with the two queens.  Macleod missed quicker mates, but got the job done. 

» posted in Chess Players
 

Comments:

by dpenaranda - 3 months ago
Costa Rica
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 90

Not only was with two queens! Lasker was white! and he couldn't queen.

by Antariksha - 4 months ago
International
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 180

I'd like to see MacLeod try on Lasker one on one. Then we would really see some fireworks!

by ADK - 4 months ago
Santa Clarita, CA United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 16413

Ouch.

ADK

by chessplayer110 - 4 months ago
Philadelphia United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 344

Oh, how the tables have turned

by ShockeR_40 - 4 months ago
Wrocław Poland
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 90

wow ...

by cfrench49 - 4 months ago
Spokane Valley United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 767

Talk about being stubborn!

by joriz - 4 months ago
havana Cuba
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 95

impressive

by andrewjacob - 4 months ago
United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 61

ouch

by NachsueB - 4 months ago
Bangkok Thailand
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 7

Wow that hurts!

by tadartabo - 4 months ago
arunachal pradesh,itanagar India
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 38

After queen and rook went out of the board, the game seems favour for white but i think the king activity wasn`t good.

by drumdaddy - 4 months ago
International
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 143

Only in the old days would a master play on while down two queens.

by sandwich770 - 4 months ago
Ohio United States
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 75

he just got destroyed but its okay since he won the event right?

by matzleeach - 4 months ago
Chicago IL United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 805

17...f5! ouch

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.