superb

good

it is quite difficult to anticipate step-by-step moves and countermoves even with the limited pieces in endgames, much more to analyze the positions that arise. Precision of the likes of Capablanca is rare. But I doubt his statement that the opening must be studied in relation to the endgame. The opening is quite far to the end game. It is middlegame, maybe, that should be studied in relation to the endgame that you want, as in Capablanca's game that is presented.

Anyway, the article is a worthwhile reading for all chess enhusiasts! Thanks.

I really wanna feel something like capablanca but I don't know how to spot endgames. I cannot get an indication no matter how I tried to repeat the game. It is a very complex endgame. Perhaps, I need more experience to be able to see what's ahead in the game. I will just memorize the games for the mean time until a I understand the core plan of capablanca. However, I'd like to thanks the one who shared the game.

Great!

Thanx for this article twice, first for showing one of the best chess masters for all times: Capablanca; second for shawing the best way to play endgames, of course with Capablancas recommendation. Thanx again for sharing...

Am amazed at capablanca's confidence in his moves!

Thanks for the article!

thx:)

interesting end game

Nice article :). I always wonder to what extent players like Capablanca "see" the endgame once they enter it. It seems too much to assume they see it all the way through. I guess they just sort of 'feel' that there will be a lasting advantage..

Thanks for posting this. A very enjoyable game. I played it over a few times to try and get a little of the feel of Capablanca's endgame play.