Najdorf Returns Part 2

Submitted by GM arunabi on Wed, 08/19/2009 at 10:25pm.

Last week we saw some of the straight-forward theoretical draws and some exciting well-fought draws. Today we will take a look at some other continuations for black. To begin with, playing the sicilian itself is a huge move towards avoiding a straight-forward draw. Unlike some dry openings, the Sicilian gives both colors good opportunities to create counterplay and push for a win. However we did see that some of those forced, well-analysed draws do occur occasionally. So the one thing that can be done to avoid them is to know the pitfalls. Study the opening thoroughly to know where such technical draws can happen and where they can be avoided. This knowledge will definitely help you choose between the variations in different tournament or match situations.

 

We will start our proceedings today with the recent world championship game between Anand and Kramnik. This was the last game in the match and Anand, playing white, just needed a draw to wrap up the title. Kramnik managed to come out of the opening succesfully; we call it a success since it was more of a double-edged position rather than a dull one. It is interesting as one of the comments in the previous article about “Playing for a draw” is more relevant here. This is a typical situation where one player might be interested in playing for a draw, but if you notice Anand played actively in his process to achieve the draw.

 

 

That game decided the world champion! It does take a lot of pressure to play such games and Anand came out with what he needed. At this point we would also like our readers to understand that we are trying to cover all the possible moves out of this variation, that way when you guys encounter this on the board you will know your choices. The next game is from the young French GM Vachier Lagrave and he has tried 7...Nc6:

 

 

The endgame in that game was definitely good for black. Active pieces, the weak e5 square for white all summed to a good game for the young French GM. Our last game today will be between Shirov and Ivanchuk

 

 

The Najdorf is such an interesting opening with so much more scope, that it is bound to return again. Our suggestion to our readers would be to study more than one variation within an opening, that way depending on the situation you may be able to avoid a drawn variation or take your opponent into one.

 

» posted in Opening Theory
 

Comments:

by gsorita - 3 months ago
Philippines
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 102

thanks for the article

by General-Lee - 3 months ago
Elizabethtown United States
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 265

Dear GM Arunabi:

Quite technically, these games all transposed from the Najdorf into the Sheveningen variations. 

by king_43 - 3 months ago
Nicosia Cyprus
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 90

Thanks GM arunabi that really helped me!!! :)

by GM arunabi - 3 months ago
Chennai India
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 113

To king_43

Well it is a bit risky keeping the king in the centre without castling but the situation demands it. Castling Kingside is suicidal due to the bad pawn structure and the queenside is already exposed (sometimes Black castles queenside but the light square bishop shall provide the necessary support for the King). The pawn mass in the centre f7.f6,e6,d6 are quite strong and if Black can manage to exchange queens his central pawns will prove decisive in the endgame.

Hope this helps!!!

by kiki-22 - 3 months ago
pasig Philippines
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 155

good one

by chalaco - 3 months ago
Callao Peru
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 70

Great article, thx!!!

by mwx - 3 months ago
United States
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 2

good games.

by GRThompson - 3 months ago
United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 36

I love these lessons.  Thanks!

by jellybeanjunkie - 4 months ago
Trinidad/Tobago
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 4

I've always found this opening so interesting. .  thanks and keep posting :D

by king_43 - 4 months ago
Nicosia Cyprus
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 90

Great games and great article but in these games we have seen black is not getting his king castled to safety.Isnt that a little bit risky? 

by simpledimple - 4 months ago
wausau, wis United States
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 11

in regard to black having to fight for draws.  i would like to see a programer come up with a game similar to chess, but where both sides would lock in a move, and the moves would be  revealed at the same time. pieces that would  occupy the same square would simply dissapear. the game would end when a king disapears,and would only draw if both kings bumped in to each other. the tempo difference would no longer exist.   feel free to name it simpledimple, i would only ask to play for free.

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.