Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Openings for Tactical Players: The Latvian Gambit

Submitted by GM Gserper on Sun, 10/18/2009 at 12:08am.

Before we start the discussion about the Latvian Gambit (1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 f5), I have a confession to make.  I never really trusted in this opening. It is one thing to play a risky King's Gambit and it is a totally different thing to play the same King's Gambit being a tempo down (I am sure most of the readers noted that if we look at the position after 1.e4 e5 2. f4 Nf6 and ask Black to play a second move in a row, then it will be exactly the Latvian Gambit with reversed colors). Yet, the Latvian Gambit has many devoted followers, so I thought it would be unfair to ignore this sharp opening.

It is easy to discuss this opening from the White point of view since you can find many reliable ways for White to get an advantage. For instance, you can follow in the footsteps of young Vassily Smyslov who decided that it is better to avoid the complications and just underline the positional deficiencies of this opening.

 

 

Of course this is not the only strategy.  White can accept the complications since in most cases they are favorable for him as the next short game shows.
So, what should Black hope for when he plays the Latvian Gambit?  Since the motto of the opening is "Complications for the sake of complications," if White doesn't play energetically enough he can easily end up in a very bad position as the next game shows. Please notice that unlike Smyslov in the first game, White didn't play d3, preferring d4 instead and therefore leaving the dangerous e4 pawn alive.
Of course White played very passively in the previous game and was punished for that.  But the next game is a true delight for any Latvian Gambit connoisseur. White attacked practically the whole game and it looked like the Black King was going to get checkmated very soon... yet it was the White King that got in trouble!
The conclusion is pretty simple.  Even though the Latvian Gambit isn't a completely sound opening it still requires your opponent to know some theory and be alert since one tactical mistake can completely turn the tables. This is an ideal opening for the daredevils who care more about the excitement of the game than the final result.   
Good luck! (you will need it, if you play the Latvian Gambit).

» posted in Tactics
« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Comments:

by MrMister99 - 8 months ago
Las Vegas United States
Member Since: Nov 2010
Member Points: 77
[COMMENT DELETED]
by chessman_calum - 2 years ago
Buckinghamshire England
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 6583

yes he should

by sonty - 2 years ago
New Delhi India
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 49

Black should not go for Latvian Gambit.

by bosco - 2 years ago
Poland
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 237

<!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt; mso-header-margin:35.4pt; mso-footer-margin:35.4pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} -->

[ insert witty comment here ]

by LatvianGambit - 2 years ago
Texas United States
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 18

LONG LIVE THE LATVIAN!!!!

by alpha122alpha - 2 years ago
Toronto Canada
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 323

second last puzzle is brilliant... white can't play Rg1 either :)

by sicilian_09 - 2 years ago
cavite Philippines
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 18

interesting discussion. indeed it helped me a lot as a novice chess player. i got to think about it more after reading this article. well, let me just say that it's worth learning coz my fellow club players dont usually use the opening. I think they dont even know it existed.LOL. though, i think it was necesarry to be sharp getting into the line. thanks

by chessbibliophile - 2 years ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2007

There are more than 8000 games with Latvian Gambit in UltraCorr3 CD. White has won 50% of the games.Black has won 30%.The remaining 20% are drawn. In correspondence chess, players have all the time in the world to find the “right” move.How is it that White has managed wins in only 50% of the games after 100 years of play? There is also a Latvian Gambit World Championship held every few years.White would have won all the games if there was a specific line of direct refutation. Matters are not so simple. The Latvian Gambit is no more unsound than the Poisoned Pawn Variation and no less. The proof of pudding is in the eating.Currently the theory of the Latvian is still in a state of flux. Why not see some concrete variations here in stead of generalizations?Interested  readers may scroll down the page to find precisely a line that poses the challenge to Black.

 

 

by Summum_Malum - 2 years ago
Copenhagen Denmark
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 587

There was a Danish mathematician named Georg Mohr. He even has a math-competition named after him.. Just a curious fact. Have never used the Latvian myself, though Bent Larsen encourages to try it in a book called "Sharp Openings"... I have played against it a couple of times, and won.. 

by MDavison - 2 years ago
Chicago United States
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 22

very interesting article, thanks for posting.  certainly worth studying.

by StupidDrip95 - 2 years ago
NJ United States
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 1510

I'll be brief. I do not trust this opening. Undecided

by chessman_calum - 2 years ago
Buckinghamshire England
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 6583

and also, boog, I remember that elephant gambit game, eh? ;-)

by chessman_calum - 2 years ago
Buckinghamshire England
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 6583

Just a thought. One of my favourite openings is the latvian (which is what persuaded me to this forum), and I have played the latvian gambit loads on the board and online. I get the best results on on the board, against my golden oldy friends. Not being agist, but I seem to find that many players say 40+ in age, play e4 as their regular opening as white. This makes it easy to get into the latvian gambit. Many of them take about 5 minutes on the third move which also gives you the upper hand for the rest of the game. Anyway, thank you very much for the analysis you provided and hope the latvian brings joy for everyone.

chessman_calum, Calum Harris.

by Diabeditor - 2 years ago
Edmonton Canada
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 683

John Elburge has written books on the Latvian Gambit and is currently working on another one. He accepts Latvian Gambit email games from anyone who challenges him. He plays the Black side from the starting position 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 f5.

He reaches positions that the book lines say favour White, but he always wins.

by boogaloo - 2 years ago
Dayton United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 770

The Latvian Gambit is what encouraged me to study chess.  That was 7 years ago and I play everyday now.  Only one Latvian Gambit game right now though.  I play the Elephant Gambit.  If you want to throw off your opponent and have interesting games then I suggest at least playing a few Latvian Gambit games.

Boog.

by chessbibliophile - 2 years ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2007

The Latvian Gambit was played by great players like Keres and Spassky with success.World champions,Capablanca and Fischer have been on its receiving end.In this opening it is important for both White and Black to know how to play.The present focus of debate in the Latvian world is on 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5 3.Nxe5 Qf6 4.Nc4 fxe4 5.Nc3 Qf7! 6.Ne3*

( 6.Nxe4?? d5 7.Ne5 Qf5 loses the knight.) d5!? 7.N(e3)xd5  Be6 8.Bc4 Na6 9.b3 followed by Bb2.

Here the power of White bishops cannot be underestimated.Let us wait and see what Black may come up with.

(*Note: The simple 6.d3 may not yield much after 6…d5 7.Ne5 Qf6! 8.d4 c6 9.Be2 Bd6 10.Ng4 Bxg4 11.Bxg4 Ne7 12.0-0 0-0 =)

 

 

 

 

by MrFantasy - 2 years ago
Reggio Emilia Italy
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 171

nice one

by DylanAM - 2 years ago
Arkansas United States
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 187

Doesn't seem like a very sound opening at all.  You have to rely on chance and underpreparation.  A lot of these gambits can give you a decent middlegame position if you exchange out of them, this one doesn't look like it will.

by skewer2000 - 2 years ago
Leesburg United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1164

I eat the Latvian for lunch.

by satanicwarmaster - 2 years ago
valletta Malta
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 73

Ok, it is well known that the opening is unsound but it seems like it could be worth a try, just for the hell of it:))nice analysis, by the way.

« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.