Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Opposite Side Castling: The Basics, Part 1

Submitted by spassky on Tue, 11/03/2009 at 9:37am.

In games where the players castle on opposite sides, an attack against the opposing king is almost always in order.  The rational for this is "If you don't do it to him, he's going to do it to you" or, if you like, the more pithy "Kill or be killed".  In this game, it was White who really took this advice to heart.

This game illustrates the cardinal rule of opposite side castling: "Make threats quickly and keep them coming".  From move 12 on, White created threat after threat and Black never even got going on the queenside.  It also shows that the old saying "Count the pieces on the board, not off the board." is true.  Although White was behind by a knight and rook "off of the board", he had an abundance of material where it counted "on the board", namely, Black’s kingside. For more games and tips, visit www.brucetill.com .   Also visit http://startlivingtoday.pmgnorthstar.com/newincome.html .

» posted in Strategy
 

Comments:

by MikeDoyle - 7 months ago
Huntsville, AL United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 57167

Thanks much for the answer!  I'm looking for a good opposite side castling ECO for a vote chess game. 

by spassky - 7 months ago
Gaithersburg, MD United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 422

To Mike Doyle:

I you look in the Chess.com "Game Explorer" (under the "Learn" tab above), you will see that the line you give has been played many times and, as nearly as I can tell, White seems to winning the lion's share of those games.  I used to play the Nimzo-Indian as Black a long time ago (I switched to the King's Indian and like it a lot better), but I don't recall having ever played all the way up to the position you give.  It seems White is able to exert central pressure very rapidly.  For example, if White plays Nb5 and Ne4, he suddenly has 4 men attacking the hole on d6.  And as we all know, an attack on the wing will always fail if the center is not blocked and you don't have control of it.

Thanks for the question!

by MikeDoyle - 7 months ago
Huntsville, AL United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 57167

Has any one ever played E23 Stahlberg Variation, Nimzo-Indian 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Qb3 c5 5.dxc5 Nc6 6.Nf3 Ne4 7.Bd2 Nxd2 8.Nxd2 O-O 9.O-O-O?  Does black have the initiative here after opp. side castling with first move or is white in a better position?

 

by athalurijagadish - 2 years ago
hyderabad India
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 128

that attack on black king was splendid and relentless.thanks a lot.

by Constalker - 2 years ago
Sydney Australia
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 35

Thanks. Abundantly persuasive.

by Con09 - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Nov 2009
Member Points: 10

It would be helpful if you put the variations in the move list, rather than in the notes.

by Crowded_House - 2 years ago
Calne, Wiltshire England
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 479

Very instructive ... as usual!

by spassky - 2 years ago
Gaithersburg, MD United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 422

To Hackattack:

Once you play h4, you are kind of committed to castling queenside, since you have weakened your kingside somewhat.  The only reason to play h4 before you castle is to possibly slip in h5 before that gets prevented by ...h5.  I do that in the Yugoslav Attack vs. the Dragon Sicilian, with which I am sure you are familiar (ceajee vs. hackattack, Nov. 1 (he should have played 17. Bh6, not 17. f4)).  In this game, it's just a transposition with no significance.  But you never know if someone will panic and play a weird move when they see h4.

by hackattack - 2 years ago
Melbourne Australia
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 169

so before opposite side castling, would you recommend playing a move like h4 to see how the opponent will react?

by kco - 2 years ago
Perth Australia
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 23212

Hi spassky good to have you back, you been away for awhile have you ?

by kitifolen - 2 years ago
madrid Spain
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 92

very pragmatical

by spassky - 2 years ago
Gaithersburg, MD United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 422

To Dimitrije_Mandic:

I edit my posts with another program that doesn't allow integrating the variations in with the main line.  To do that, I would have to re-enter the whole thing into the chess.com viewer, rather that cutting and pasting it from my other blog (at www.brucetill.com). 

As a compromise, why not try using the analysis board feature of the chess.com posts?  Right under the viewer where the moves appear, there is a button called "Analyse".  Clicking on this opens a new board (with the moves of the game) where you can move the pieces around.  So just click the move buttons to get to the position where the analysis note is, then read the note in one window and play it over in the other.  You can resize the windows so that they appear side by side on your screen.  I tried it already and it's pretty easy.  Anyway, the majority of my notes are just words, and the ones with variations are usually just a move or two.  I know move 20 of this post had a longer variation, since it was a mate in 10, but that's unusual for my my posts. 

Sorry about any inconvenience, and I hope my dual board solution works for you (post another comment if you have trouble).  Thanks for reading my articles!  And don't forget to visit my other sites:

www.polarismediagroup.com/startlivingtoday                          and
by Dimitrije_Mandic - 2 years ago
Niš Serbia
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 462

I'm probably not the first one to ask this, mr. Till, but would you mind inserting your variations into the viewer? I find this more practical than to visualize at all costs, since those who want to visualize can just look at the variations, and then try to play them inside their heads. Thanks in advance!

by chessoholicalien - 2 years ago
Missouri United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 1156

Is that Gary Stevens the Everton football player? :)

Btw good article!

by zankfrappa - 2 years ago
Virginia United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 5735

     This is a nice win from my favorite decade.  I love to castle queenside and then charge the opponent's king.  One can often sacrifice a pawn, knight, or bishop and get the
win, but if it doesn't happen in under 30 moves the attack may fail.
     I hope you write some new articles for Chess.com, I enjoy your positive-thinking approach and your aggressive style.

by king_43 - 2 years ago
Nicosia Cyprus
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 105

Great game and an excellent attack!

by Kaonashi - 2 years ago
Nieuwegein Netherlands
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 90

Great article! Very insightful and helpfull, since I prefer castling on the queen side, just because of its attacking nature.

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.