Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Picking a Reptertoire

Submitted by IM Silman on Mon, 06/29/2009 at 1:56am.

ML asked:

I've been having problems deciding on an opening repertoire for Black. I've been trying all sorts of stuff – Sicilian Dragon, Pirc, French, 1…e5, Alekhine, and even 1...b6.
I’m searching for a repertoire which I feel very safe and comfortable with. I'm playing a very important tournament in June-July which I really want to win and I have good chances. My national rating is about 1750-1900 and I’m a 12 year-old junior.
I’m searching for an opening against 1.e4 which is not too common, aggressive so that White really must know some theory and most important at all, even if White plays very good in the opening and survives my attack, I will be fine. The Dragon is a good option right know but I’m having difficulties remembering my repertoire against boring Anti-Sicilians.

Do you know any opening that fits this description?

Dear ML:

So you want an opening as Black that gives you a huge attack right off, and if your opponent somehow survives the onslaught, you’ll still be safe with a good game? Don’t we all want such an opening? Of course, this would mean that Black has the better game right from move one while White has to defend and hope to equalize. In other words, you’re dreaming – there isn’t such an opening!

Now let’s go back to planet reality and look into repertoire philosophy. First off, you need to find something that suits your personal temperament. It doesn’t matter if the books show the lines in this opening to be equal or even a bit better for White, if you like the resulting position and feel comfortable with it, then it’s for you!

The Sicilian Dragon is a very aggressive, do or die theoretical landmine kind of opening that has always appealed to young players who are willing to put a lot of time into opening study. You need to know reams of analysis if you wish to play it properly. If you have a fantastic memory, and if you are a skilled attacking player that understands the value of a well-timed Exchange sacrifice, and if you understand that you’ll be mated as often as you mate, then this might well be for you! Keep in mind that white players who open 1.e4 fear the Dragon and thus seriously prepare for it.

How memory intensive is the Dragon?  Let’s take a look at the following line (don't forget to click on MOVE LIST to see all the text and moves):

 

You also mentioned 1.e4 b6. This is playable, and is also not very theoretical. However, I find black's position a bit drab after 2.d4 Bb7 3.Nd2. Here's an example:

 

 

 

 

The Alekhine Defense (1.e4 Nf6) is interesting, and most don’t really prepare for it. You let White build up a huge pawn center and then you have to find a way to smack it down (1.e4 Nf6 2.e5 Nd5 3.c4 Nb6 4.d4 d6 5.f4).

The Pirc (1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6) is also playable, but presupposes that you enjoy positions with a bit less space but chances at counterattacking your opponent’s big pawn center. If that excites you, then the Pirc has your name all over it.

Double king-pawn systems are very sound, but usually offer White a small edge vs. your solid, very correct setup. Of course, after 1.e4 e5 you not only have to worry about the Ruy Lopez (2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5), but also the King’s Gambit (2.f4), the Vienna Game (2.Nc3), and various other tries.

The French Defense is a solid and very combative opening. In fact, some players stick with it for life, and swear by its complicated lines and it’s basic center-bashing plan (1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 c5 followed by bringing everyone to bear against d4 via …Qb6, …Nc6, and even …Ng8-e7-f5).

Truth to tell, all these openings are fine. However, picking one is a very personal choice that can’t be done by a stranger. You have to do it, or a teacher that’s intimately familiar with your style, games, and strengths can also help you make the choice.

PS: A gentleman from Hong Kong mentioned the Caro-Kann, and he's wise to do so. I often recommend the Caro-Kann to my students since the ideas are fairly simple to learn and most players don't have anything worthwhile prepared against it. After 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 dxe4 4.Nxe4 Black can play the solid and logical 4...Bf5 (a move I successfully took up at the end of my career) or the more dynamic (and riskier) 4...Nf6 5.Nxf6+ gxf6 (I played this in a couple dozen tournament games with fantastic results). The highly theoretical 4...Nd7 should be avoided by amateurs.

When you consider that top players like Karpov, Anand, Kasparov, and lately Topalov made/make the Caro-Kann an important part of their repertoires, it's hard not to view this opening with tremendous respect.

» posted in Opening Theory
« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Comments:

by mattattack99 - 12 months ago
Ann Arbor United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 3186

I play the Dragon, and it is very addictive. Once you start it is hard to quit!

by gsorita - 2 years ago
Philippines
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 117

i admire mr siliman advice cause he is telling the truth he he he one must study hard to achive better understanding of every opening theory that he wants according to his style but i think in my own way just enjoy the game and dont be afraid to lose as long as you are maximizing your time and effort how to improve every openning theory you want

by gramps33 - 2 years ago
Detroit United States
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 1905

I am 77 years old with a bad memory, but I still like the dragon. almost any opening is good if you follow general principles. But a very good article.

by kirkland - 2 years ago
martinez Ga. United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 273

funny heres a IM telling someone about chess and everyone well not evreyone, disses what what he says to some one starting out i find myself in the same situation but if he learns what he tells him than he will be better and know more aspects of the game of chess you know anyhow i play the ruy lopez a lot and scothc games but ill tell you what the ruy Lopez has a lot of differant lines to it which are really quite cool

by General-Lee - 2 years ago
Elizabethtown United States
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 269

Goodness, EVERYONE seems to like the french and Caro-Kann, does this also hint that EYVERYONE will be prepared for it?? i'm thinking DUH. I prefer the also popular, but much more flexible Sicilian. There are simply too many lines for white to be prepared for all of them. Avoid the Najdorf and Dragon and no one will have a clue what to do. Then it's not theory that matters, it's who plays better. P.S. The french is very conservative, and as an attacking player i've found the ensuing wood pushing very boring.

by FirebrandX - 2 years ago
Denton, TX United States
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 780

I've jumped around to quite a few different tries against e4. I started off with the french and even landed some big wins with it. Ultimately I found I just didn't like facing the Tarrasch and also felt less inspired to play against the exchange variation. I've also played the Pirc, but facing certain Austrian Attack lines with an early e5 by white just became a lot of work to deal with, not to mention the neo-classical lines promoted by Roman Dzindzichashvili (which have yet to be properly dealt with in books for the Pirc player).

Eventually I landed on the Scandinavian with Qd6. This is fun in blitz games, but there are a few problems like the g3 variation (white's best try), and also annoying is white players avoiding main lines by playing pesky c4-d4 pawn structures. If you'e not well-prepared against either one of those plans, you can quickly get a into a miserable position in the Scandi.

Now I'm jumping full-force into the open games with 1...e5. If I expect to improve my chess understanding, there is no better opening for black.

by hope2b - 2 years ago
Upland, CA United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 63

Good suggestions.

by chem_chess - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 63

I meant is the player described here 12 years old?

by Estragon - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 4346

For a 12 year old player, or any young player who wants to develop a repertoire, I strongly recommend you try out the whole range.  Start with the classic defenses, 1 e4 e5 and 1 d4 d5.  Play them for a while, but play them a lot - in your tournament games, your casual games, your speed games, internet play, club play, everything.  Branch out from there, and try out as many different openings as you can.  You'll learn more about the game overall, and also stand a better chance of finding the ones which best fit your style because you will have also played the ones which do not!

by blacbandit - 2 years ago
marietta United States
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 8

the french def. is always good because you can set many traps

by chem_chess - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 63

now is this ML a 12 year old kid is that it? What is a 12 year old junior?

by Spiffe - 2 years ago
Orlando, FL United States
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 1938

Heh, I'm glad to have such a respected authority as IM Silman lend his thoughts to the matter.  The next time someone comes around the Openings forum asking for a Black opening that's super-aggressive, but gives them a solid position, and above all doesn't require them to learn a lot of theory -- should take about a week -- we can point them at this article.

by fgm351 - 2 years ago
A Tree United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 416

Caro-Kann   

Caro-Kann

Caro-Kann

Caro-Kann

Caro-Kann

Caro-Kann

by gambitattack - 2 years ago
Singapore Singapore
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 385

with all seriousness, i highly recommend the french. Smile

 

1. Players who play 1.e4 are looking for an 'open attacking' opportunities. The French will hardly give them any of that. (Trust me, I know, I"m an 1.e4 player myself and I really hate the french defence.)

2. The ideas behind the french are really easy to learn, and very logical (esp the idea of bashing the centre after 'inducing' white to lock it with the e5 pawn push- the only drawback I find with this system is the alekheine chartard attack (for which you have to read up on the theory.. as this system is esp dangerous for black if he is unprepared.) In almost any position you can find the right move!

3. Once you're bored with the above system, you can explore other opening systems with the french ie. the french winawer or the rubeinstein variation... There's plenty of subsystems to explore for life!

by Floyyd - 2 years ago
San Jose United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 960

Don't try anything else than a Sicilian variation. Personally, i find the O'Kelly Variation way more exciting and less expected.

by ishcairn - 2 years ago
Detroit United States
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 69

Study the Latvian Gambit.

I'm gonna get slammed for saying this, but I'm mentioning this only because I can almost guarantee that White is not going to be prepared for it.  It also gives you the attacking chances at the beginning that you want and is still playable even if White escapes the minefield (you are about .75 behind after move 10 in most variations in Rybka if both sides play perfectly...but the chances of White playing perfectly 10 to 15 moves in is slim since they won't know anything about the Latvian).

The disclaimer is this: It's much more dangerous for you (and, incidentally, for White) than the Dragon in the beginning, and your chances *if* you walk the tightrope at the beginning are playable, but odds are with White.

The Latvian scores fairly well even at Master level (it's obviously not as good as the sicilian...but nothing is), and you only really need to memorize 6 lines or so.  Any deviation in any line leaves White *hurting*...there's actually one popular continuation of the Latvian where Black goes a rook behind without a forced mate or way to equalize materially looming and is *still* considered over a point ahead.

The great thing about the Latvian in <2000 play is that you're going to know it inside out and the other guy will be lost after 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5!?

That means the only other major e4 opening you're going to have to learn to defend against is the King's Gambit.

by madpawn - 2 years ago
London England
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 1039

Just sneak your king off the board when your opponent is not looking. I've never lost with this move!

by Muzio5 - 2 years ago
--- Wales
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 97

The dragon is the best...and at 12 you should have time to learn the theory!

by PrideNSorrow - 2 years ago
California United States
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 80

I enjoy the french defense as black.  The one piece that gives you trouble as black in the french is the light-squared bishop, since it's normally blocked by your pawn chain on e6 and d5 for quite some time. One idea to trade off this bad piece is to play b6 and Ba6 to trade it off, but that takes away the b6 square for your queen.  On top of that, this line is only an option in some lines of the french.  This development idea and a few other ideas common to the french are often mitigated by the exchange, advance, and steiner variations, in my humble opinion though.

For this reason, I've begun to study the alekhine and caro-kann with hopes of transposing to a french structure AFTER developing the LSB.  To <tax77>, this is the reason I love to see 2. Nc3 in the Alekhine where 2.. d5 (The scandinavian variation of the alekhine) sometimes transposes to a french structure.

Anyways, just a thought.

by keansmith - 2 years ago
Nassau Bahamas
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 8

I agree with your article. 

« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.