It's time for another example of piece activity and development. If there is anything we can learn from the masters, it is their ability to place a greater emphasis on major pieces over pawns. We move the clock up a bit from Morphy's day to 1935 where Paul Keres demonstrates that active forces outway won pawns.
Creg, Thanx for the lesson. Be careful about pawn grabbing. Development is better. Got it..!
I do agree really, however, mental strenght and chess board do play significant roles too
Cool your erilier than me ive been playing since five
<chopra> 7. Bg5 is a logical continuation as it sticks to white's theme of activating his pieces. Sure, there are better moves for Black, but it is important to understand that when you play a game you must come up with a plan over the board. It is obvious that black opted to win material as he simply never figured white to achieve the attack that he did. Even up to 12...Bd6 black most likely felt comfortable with his decision to go for pawns, and only after 13. Nxf7! did he begin to realize that he may be in for a fight.
This however is not a daily puzzle and I do not like to nit-pick over a better move here or there. The objective of the article is a lesson on piece activity. It shows how a player should look for development, as well as active piece placement over grabbing pawns.
never mind
Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.
Share your chess knowledge with the community!
Submit an article