Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Power of development

Submitted by PavleKosic on Sun, 07/19/2009 at 6:02am.

I know that all of you are already familiar with the great power of the development, especially guys who like to play gambit lines, yet still there are lot of players who are going for the material because they think that they can defend themselves and then in the endgame they will won easily. Although materialistic players are right in some point of view they still have to survive pretty strong attack of their opponents and if they are not careful they will lose pretty quickly.

I want to show you two miniature games which I played where my opponents neglect their development and they were crushed in less then 20 moves. You should also see both of my opponents in this game made some mistakes which cost them very very much. I will not annotate first two games because they are examples of bad play and you will see yourself that their play was bad.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This third game is the real reason for this article, because my opponent didn't made any blunder, he made a one waste tempo move, and after that he couldnt recover any more. This game is a great example why in the opening we need to play active and to fight for the initiative because if we let to our opponent to dictate the tempo of the game this can be very, very bad for us. Also its my best win so far so I am kind of proud on it:).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What are the lessons here? If you attack and sack some pawns then you have to play really active and you must not let your opponent to consolidate. IF you are defender you must not underestimate chances of the attackers, and you should play as active as you can and you must not neglect your development. If your opponent put you in the corner and if you cant develop your pieces be sure that something bad will happen. Once again this article is made for players under 1800 but I think it can be useful even for stronger players. Thanks for reading any comment is more then welcome.

» posted in For Beginners
« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Comments:

by PeterIWalker - 14 months ago
Wales
Member Since: Oct 2010
Member Points: 1

Thanks PavleKosic- An interesting and useful example

by C-dog1 - 16 months ago
United States
Member Since: Jul 2010
Member Points: 205

good article, some very key points in there.

by Zugmug - 17 months ago
Nr Walsall United Kingdom
Member Since: Jan 2010
Member Points: 11

Good article-dealing with that elusive concept of the initiative and winning/ loseing a tempo.

by thegamemasterG - 20 months ago
cape town South Africa
Member Since: Oct 2009
Member Points: 35

greath can somebody help me find beter openings contact me . this was a usefil artikel.thanks

by PavleKosic - 20 months ago
Belgrade Serbia
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 309

If he do not take this pawn then I can push my b4 pawn on b5 attack his knight and then pick up his e5 pawn which is unprotected... If he took with the knight then I am capturing his e5 pawn with my knight and then I am presuring f7 squere with both knight and the bishop.

by edoodzs - 20 months ago
Davao Philippines
Member Since: May 2010
Member Points: 1

What if he will not take your b4 pawn??? or he will take your b4 pawn by knight??? what's your next move??

by PavleKosic - 23 months ago
Belgrade Serbia
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 309

Sorry Torosar but what are you talking about? First examples are just examples. Last game is really meaningful. My opponent is better rated in chess.com ratings (HIs rating was 1920 at that time and my was 1886), also my opponent have a Fide rating of 1650 so I dont see how you can say that he is weak opponent? I never played fide rated tournament, so I dont really get the point of your comment....Please explain?

by torosar - 23 months ago
Romania
Member Since: Feb 2010
Member Points: 6

good article but you were much stronger than your opponents and this why you won so easy . try playing like that against defensive  1400 rated players .i dont think you will win.you won because they bluffed.you make sacrifices but defensive players wont accept to trade pieces with you.and you will have problems. besides you played with white and is very easy to defeat a 900 elo player who plays with black against you a 1800 player.

by PavleKosic - 2 years ago
Belgrade Serbia
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 309

He cant play 16. Ke7. Did you mean some other squere or you thought on some earlier move? Entire E file is controled by my rook...He cant place his king there...

by slapshots101 - 2 years ago
Grand Rapids United States
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 149

in the third game. 19. Qh4 is what screwed him, he was actually not in bad shape for most the game. he should have also played 16.Ke7... it would have given him more chances...

but it was a well played game.

by PavleKosic - 2 years ago
Belgrade Serbia
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 309

I would apreciate if you can tell me in what move did you find the knight on g7? I really dont know what are you talking about. Also in stead of earlier in the game, I would apreciate to say in exactly what move you sugest moving the knight so I can show you why is that bad. Tnx Pavle

by Quack126 - 2 years ago
Canada
Member Since: Jan 2010
Member Points: 30

why doesn't black just move the g7 knight earlier then castle to get out of that very tough position? very easily, black could have defended. That shows you that devoloping can be used both for defencive techniques and offensive techniques.

by viswamitra - 2 years ago
New York United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 123

As a beginner I appreciate the principles of development. I especially liked the principle that stronger development allows you to trade with an opponent's developed piece without losing ground.

by PeterArt - 2 years ago
Luijk Belgium
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 1000

great article nice games.

by RidzwanYu-Gi-Oh - 2 years ago
Kuantan Malaysia
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 38

thanks for the advice

by lakeland - 2 years ago
liverpool England
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 37

nice, good advice

by PavleKosic - 2 years ago
Belgrade Serbia
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 309

To Shiro Europe:

yes I know, blunder when writing :), I wanted to say that he wanted to go on queenside

by Titov - 2 years ago
Djibouti
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 37

Hvala Pavle.

Foot in mouth

by pawnkeeper - 2 years ago
Los Angeles United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 1012

For Pcantalupo: Why didn't you play 13. Re1 to pin the Queen?

 

Because white would lose the rook!

by shiro_europa - 2 years ago
Canada
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 421

good game, but just a note on your annotation on move 17: he cannot O-O-O.

« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.