Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Queen's Indian Update

Submitted by GM thamizhan on Thu, 09/02/2010 at 3:10am.

After two seasons of pure disastrous results in the United States Chess League (USCL) I was hoping for a fresh start this season. When I played for the Dallas Destiny in the first two seasons of the USCl, it would not be an overstatement to say I single-handedly managed to put Dallas out of the playoff picture. I guess there is something about playing on a computer screen rather than playing in an actual board (I have other excuses prepared as well).

 

Starting my campaign with the Philadelphia Inventors this year, we had to face the Boston Blitz. The match itself was spiced up by some intimidating prematch blogs from both teams. Playing black, I managed to salvage half a point against GM Larry Christiansen in a not-so-convincing game. IM Bryan Smith maintained a small advantage against GM Eugene Perelshteyn only to squander it in a rook and pawn endgame. In the battle of the youth between Kavinayan Sivakumar and Grant Xu, a pawn blunder sealed Kavin's fate in a rook and opposite colored bishop endgame. Thomas Bartell continued to show his good form to score a full point against Denys Shmelov with the black pieces on board 3. We ended up losing 2.5-1.5, but in a good fighting match that went down all the way to the last few deciding seconds.

 

I played the Queen's Indian Defense against Christiansen and he came up with a pawn sacrifice in the opening. I had studied some of his games before the game, but with a player of his caliber and his wide range of openings, it was impossible for me to review all the choices. Unfortunately for me, I ended up in one of the most sharp Queen's Indian lines.

 

 

Not a perfect game by any means. The two-bishops paranoia is something I need to work on. From a reasonable position I went into a very difficult position just to avoid playing against the two bishops.

» posted in Opening Theory
 

Comments:

by raghav - 16 months ago
India
Member Since: May 2010
Member Points: 214

Great

by gener - 17 months ago
Philippines
Member Since: Feb 2010
Member Points: 18

great

by jaycsa - 17 months ago
Pokhara Nepal
Member Since: Jun 2010
Member Points: 442

nice

by RishavBanka - 17 months ago
India
Member Since: Feb 2010
Member Points: 17

i think i have the answer for not capturing the white queen ......if black queen had done u r suggesting.....whites knight(which was captured by bishop) cud have gone ahead nd capturedthe other bishop...giving check nd threatening the black queen at the same time.....as a result black wud end up losing a bishop nd knight compared to a whites knight.....

also that move wud have affected his defence seriously

 

i hope u got it

 

:)

by Dhalsim - 17 months ago
Victoria Australia
Member Since: Mar 2010
Member Points: 91

Paiden, after QxQ NxB+ wins the queen back

by paldan - 17 months ago
saskatchewan Canada
Member Since: Sep 2010
Member Points: 2

Maybe its me not seeing something, but.... why didnt black queen X white queen when the opportunity arose on move 14 right after white knight took the pawn?

by rohit2rule - 17 months ago
kerala India
Member Since: Mar 2010
Member Points: 95

@paldan

....qxq,nxb+kr1,nxq thus loosing bishop 

by Mooseyf8 - 17 months ago
United States
Member Since: Aug 2010
Member Points: 1

I'm also wondering about black not taking white's queen...

by paldan - 17 months ago
saskatchewan Canada
Member Since: Sep 2010
Member Points: 2

is it just me.?? maybe im blind but why didn't black capitalize on taking the white queen with his queen on move 14 after white knight takes pawn. would have changed the whole game!!

by marinkatomb - 17 months ago
London England
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 42

IS it just me or does 13..Bc8 save the pawn? The Queen moves then ..Be6 retains the d pawn..?

by IM curtains - 17 months ago
United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 22

Please go to http://www.uschessleague.com for more information on the U.S. Chess League. A large number of the top players in the nation take part in the league, so if you are a United States chess fan, I'm sure you'll enjoy following it!

by PhDP - 17 months ago
Canada
Member Since: Nov 2009
Member Points: 94

@madroan: 

14....Qxf5? 15. Nxe7+ Kh8 16. Nxf5

by madroan - 17 months ago
Jena Germany
Member Since: Mar 2010
Member Points: 52

OK, so I am a beginning player and often miss obvious moves, but why not 14....Qxf5? what am i missing??

by sryiwannadraw - 17 months ago
Southern Coast United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 453

gg

by gimly - 17 months ago
anytown United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 423

i thought the computer screan excuse was pretty good all by itself :)

by Velid - 17 months ago
Michigan United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 98

Nice game. Thank you for a great article!

I live in US and I had no idea United States Chess League exists?! Surprised


Funny thing is that I asked at local chess club... Smile

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.