Chess.com will be going offline in . We will be down for approximately 60 minutes.

Right, That's Why You Castle...

Submitted by Fresh on Sat, 06/21/2008 at 7:53pm.

Opening theory is not a preferred focus for most students of the great game of chess.  Instead we are given nuggets of wisdom: "Knights before Bishops," "Develop!," "Castle!," "Don't move your Queen out too early," and so it goes.  However, most players below the 1800-2000 mark don't recognize a lot of the importance of some of these tenants and the proper time to ignore them.  Fischer makes it pretty obvious why castling in games like the Yugoslav Attack of the Dragon is a pretty important idea.  Fischer's "quiet" attack is an instructional example of how to maintain pressure on a weak position and the importance of timing in the attack.

 

 

Notice how Fischer exploits the Black King's position by first opening the center up with a pawn advance and following up with piece control of the squares surrounding the King.  After sacrificing the exchange, he doesn't play sloppily with Rd1+, which would fail to maintain the pressure.  Instead, he moves another piece in for the attack, an important lesson for all ratings of players.  Thus, Fischer saves the check for when he can best exploit it, a few moves later, bringing a forced mate or a loss of Black's Queen.  As it goes, both end up happening.  Don't leave home without Castling, kids!

» posted in Opening Theory
 

Comments:

by figrock - 11 months ago
United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 1438

I so enjoyed this game..! Very informative..! Cool

by srn347 - 16 months ago
California United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 252
White can castle on either side, and both the files are potential lines of attack. "The right to castle on either side is worth the equivalent of castling on both sides."
by JacksonPWallop - 17 months ago
Missouri United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 45
I think Black's King should have moved instead of Blakc's queen sacrificing. If the king had moved, it brought the knight into play to help protect the king?
AddiAdditionally, he could move his bishop and make a check on white , while making space for his king?
by wilsonho - 17 months ago
Singapore Singapore
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 148
I think Black was too afraid of the Kingside attack, with h4 followed up by h5, wrecking his pawn structure. However, it did leave him with 1 less defender and made him more vulnerable to attack.
by monards - 17 months ago
Sydney Australia
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 3
did black play with any real purpose?
by KingsMove - 18 months ago
Santo Domingo Dominican Republic
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 92
foregoing castling with white can be done in some positions, but doing it with black is usually a bad idea, your oponent has an extra tempo to capitalize on your uncastled king when you play black...
by gdadson - 18 months ago
Aliso Viejo United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 167

In my "early" (before I began studying) chess career, I was given what I thought was sound advice: "Don't castle too early".

The thought, I believe, was to avoid giving your opponent an early target and, therefore, an immediate opportunity to formulate an attack.

This article, like many others, would seem to throw that advice out the window.

 Wonderful game!  Thanks for the post!


by FHansen - 18 months ago
Kil Sweden
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 347
I myself often skippes the castelning in favor of a fast attack. It might be the reason why I have problems crossing the 1600 line. Good game by Fischer (as usual).
 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.