Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Russians do not Retreat!

  • GM Gserper
  • | Jun 24, 2012

As the old chess legend goes, in one of his games GM Alexander Ivanov played Nf3-g5 and after his opponent answered with h7-h6, Alexander realized that the only reasonable move he had was Ng5-f3. After pondering for a while, GM Ivanov said "Russians do not retreat!" and played Ng5xf7, which was a completely unsound sacrifice.  Unfortunately the legend doesn't reveal the outcome of the game. I am not sure how this legend started, but I am absolutely positive that it never really happened (or at least not in a tournament game).  I know GM Ivanov very well, played him many times and can assure you that he is a perfect example of good sportsmanship and therefore would never talk during a tournament game.  Nevertheless, whenever I see the Nxf7 sacrifice I cannot help but remember this legend.  I even call this sacrifice the "Russians do not retreat" sac! You all probably saw many examples of such a sacrifice. I bet almost every single chess player fell a victim of this sacrifice in the "Fried Liver Attack":

We analyzed this variation here: http://www.chess.com/article/view/myth-and-reality

The Nxf7 sacrifice in the Fried Liver Attack leads to an unclear position, but in the next famous game of Mikhail Tal, Black immediately found himself in big trouble.

In the following game the best student of Mikhail Tal made his teacher very proud. There is a scary (or funny, depending on your perception) story about this game. I played the same World Junior Championship and remember that very frequently the group of Soviet players (future GMs Shirov, Dreev, Ulibin and myself) walked around the city before our games.  But Alexey Shirov always liked to go his own way, which is something that really helped him in his chess career but could have cost him dearly that particular day.  He went far away from the hotel and in some remote area (and I assume it was a bad neighbourhood) a guy pointed a rifle at him. As it turned out the guy thought that a very tall future super GM  was going to steal something from him and therefore he didn't mean any harm but used the rifle for self defense.  Anyway, the same evening Alexey produced the following gem.  I guess it was easy for him to play because after a near death experience, who cares about a little horsie? Smile

Unlike the original "Russians do not retreat" sacrifice, the Knight can be sacrificed on the 'f7' square even if it is not attacked by a pawn and it can start on a square other than 'g5'.
Finally let me show you a relatively recent game played by two elite GMs. It was revealed that the Nxf7 sac was the fruit of home preparation, but it has all the features of the classical "Russians do not retreat!" sacrifice: it didn't lead to a forced checkmate and yet the Black King was in constant danger throughout the whole game.
According to the reports this novelty was found by Topalov's second GM Ivan Cheparinov.  I don't know how many hours the Bulgarian team and their computers spent on this opening bomb, so I won't even try to determine where Black made the decisive mistake and what was a better way to defend.  Just enjoy an extraordinary chess show:

I hope you'll add the Nxf7 sacrifice to your chess arsenal because you don't need to be Russian to play it! Smile


  • 3 years ago


    "Russians do not retreat? History on their war tactics says otherwise!"
    +1 to this comment :-)

    There's no Like button here, so I have to write.

    And thanks for the article!

  • 3 years ago


    Russians do not retreat? History on their war tactics says otherwise!

  • 3 years ago


    ritz135 asked: Brilliant. I've actually been eyeing up that sac a bunch lately, but haven't hadd the guts to do it. How do you evaluate it based on how developed your position is vs development of your opponent?

    Answer:  It all depends upon your opponent's next move.

  • 3 years ago


    just so you know I am Russian, since both of my parents are russian but I was born in America

  • 3 years ago


    I have suffered this attack as Black but found out that this sacrifice is unsound. It is generally played to play mind games and have a psychological effect on the adversary to the extent that one can't think rationally and loses objectivity as in should the game be played for material advantage or for king safety and hence, in many cases Black loses.

  • 3 years ago


    Nice IRONYEmbarassed- Tal was RUSSIAN GMFrown ?  Simagin,of course-was.But Simagin-RETREATED!Best russian GM,who never retreated was ,of course,A.A.A.-Alexander,Alexandrovich Alekhine! (he was BETTER than Tal).He liked sacs. on f7 too....

  • 3 years ago

    WGM Natalia_Pogonina

    No, we don't! Tongue Out

  • 3 years ago


    one of my games:

  • 3 years ago


    Nice article!

  • 3 years ago


    Brilliant. I've actually been eyeing up that sac a bunch lately, but haven't hadd the guts to do it. How do you evaluate it based on how developed your position is vs development of your opponent?

  • 3 years ago


    Great puzzles! 

Back to Top

Post your reply: