Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Smith-Morra Gambit

  • IM Silman
  • | Jun 15, 2009
  • | 30892 views
  • | 26 comments

Srikanth Narahari asked:

The following variation of the Smith-Morra Gambit is one of my favorite opening lines with White:


1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.Nxc3 Nc6 5.Bc4 e6 6.Nf3 d6 7.O-O a6 8.Qe2 Be7 9.Rd1 b5 10.Bb3 Ra7 11.Be3 Rd7 12.Rac1 Bb7 13.Nxb5 axb5 14.Qxb5 Nf6 15.Rxc6 Bxc6 16.Qxc6 O-O 17.Ba4 e5 18.Nxe5 dxe5 19.Rxd7 Nxd7 20.Qxd7 Qxd7 21.Bxd7 Rd8 22.Ba4 Rc8


Upon trying to evaluate the final position, I observed that white must give up the pawn on e4 in order to be able to make use of the two passed pawns "a2" and "b2." In the aforementioned position, white can prevent the a4-e4 rook fork by playing 23.f3; however, that would delay the maneuver of white's king from g1 to close to the passed pawns. Instead, if white chooses to go with 23.Kf1 Rc4 24.Bb3 Rxe4 25.Ke2, white's pawn loss could be compensated by the rapid shift of the king from the K-side to the Q-side.

I find myself unable to evaluate this position any further. I fail to see which side's position is truly superior, although I personally find white's position preferable. Your opinion regarding this position would be greatly appreciated.

Dear Mr. Narahari:

Yow! You seem to know what you're talking about, while I've never seen this line before. However, I'll bravely march on and tackle it, risking nothing less than public humiliation and, ultimately, ritualistic seppuku.

First off, let me state that I have little to no respect for the Smith-Morra Gambit. While it IS indeed dangerous against an unprepared opponent, someone that's armed with the best lines for Black can expect equality at the worst, and in many cases an advantage. I feel that there are three lines for Black that stand out above all the others. First up, the Finegold Gambit (don't forget to click on MOVE LIST to see all the text and moves):







Next up is a nameless system that Langrock (the man that wrote the definitive book on the Smith-Morra) called, "clever".







Finally we come to the most threatening line of all -- the Morra Killer!








Anyway, I apologize for getting so far off point! Let’s return to the line that interests you and your question:












Comments


  • 4 months ago

    Woodchuck13

    In the Finegold Gambit here cited as a modest refutation of the Smith-Morra, would not 12. Nxf7 be crushing for white...?

  • 4 months ago

    hsong1

  • 11 months ago

    chessbond001

    at last,i got to know about how to beat smith-morra gambit. whenever i play c4 in reponse to e4, players usually play smith-morra gambit nad easily defeat me 

    thank you, silman for helping me. Smile

  • 15 months ago

    bladezii

    I will have to admit, the lazy man's approach to being more successful vs the gambits like Smith-Morra is to avoid it with a move like the ...d5 variation.

    I have to be objective and say this.  What takes years to do by beating around the bush is done a lot faster if taken on directly and persistently.  I do recognize that you will take some brutal beatings by taking on the gambit directly.  That is a fact.  Let's add this as well -- you will become much better vs the gambit by taking it on directly while at the same time studying TACTICS TACTICS, reviewing your game, studying the lines vs the gambit.

    You will be better faster.  Also, remember regardless of the level played, White HAS TO EARN his win.  He has to play better than you to win, regardless of you taking the gambit or not.

    What I know now about handling gambits made me think " I should have started earlier to learn all this.  I would have been better vs them earlier and faster." 

  • 24 months ago

    Hohenzollern

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 3 years ago

    kencoach

    One of the best methods for learning chess is "fighting" with a chess computer. The wisdom of this has been proven I think. What do you think? I enjoy this site very much.http://www.chessworldnook-shps.com/chess-computers/

  • 4 years ago

    Amanultra

    Bobby moore v jeremy silman.

    in the hands of a senior master the morra can be a weapon.

    no doubt.

    i know bobby btw.

  • 5 years ago

    eestijama

    Gambits are about position – the end.  And the Smith-Morra gambit doesn’t give white any positional advantage as far as we can see.  We can all agree that white is developed, files are open, pieces are ready, etc.  But after reading the many different analyses above, I think white would be better off AVOIDING this gambit, even against an average player who has never heard of this opening.

     

    White loses with this opening unless black has suicidal ambitions of his own.

  • 5 years ago

    milsrilion

    It seems that the three mentioned lines result in the illustrated outcomes only due to inaccuracies on white's part. Specifically,

    1) In the Finegold system, 9. Rd1 should be played before pushing onto e5. This maintains the pressure on black's position. On the other hand, a move like 9. e5 allows black to trade material, which is not favorable for white. With a material disparity of this sort, white would only want to trade if she or he can trade almost all the powers and then arrive at an endgame with two connected passed pawns on the a and b files.

    2) In Langrock's "clever" system, 10. Be3 works more in tandom with the themes of the Smith-Morra gambit. Specifically, a move like 10. Bf4 would allow black to play e5 and defend with tempo, whereas white would be best off maintaining his or her lead in piece activation and attack organization.

    3) It would be more accurate to call the "Morra Killer" Bg5 killer. Many people believe that in gambit openings, you must try to rip the opponent's position apart very quickly, and this may well be true with openings like the Queen's gambit, King's gambit, Benko gambit, Muzio gambit, and so on. However, there is reason to believe that such an approach may not work to succeed with the Smith-Morra gambit. Consider the following situation. As usual, there is one move that seems justifiable though not sound, one that is fundamentally sound in general, and one that is optimal in this opening line. If white were to move, what would you do? Hint: white is not trying to equalize but rather trying to gain an edge, and the best move in this position will help white achieve that.

  • 5 years ago

    milsrilion

    Mr. Silman,

    This is to express my belated gratitude for your reply. As you mentioned, the final position is indeed difficult to assess in the sense that white may or may not be able to force a win. However, you have drawn my attention to some very interesting sidelines.

    As for the 12. Na4 line, I will soon write and share an article regarding why one would want to choose it and why I prefer 12. Nxa4. In the same article, I want to include two other very interesting lines, namely 8. ... Qc7 and 9. ... Qc7.

    Srikanth

  • 5 years ago

    Ripper89

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 5 years ago

    NM ih8sens

    Wow, the guy who singlehandedly raised my rating 200 points is on chess.com =D!!!

     

    Got a kick out of this blog :P... "I know nothing about this line but..." and then proceeds to rhyme off the most precise analysis of the smith morra I've seen in ages. :P.

     

    Welcome aboard chess.com!  I'd die for a correspondence game if you're up for one? :P

  • 5 years ago

    Baks71

    thank you!!!

  • 5 years ago

    sputnick

    Check out my article offering a basic statistical analysis of the results of amateur opening choices: http://www.chess.com/article/view/amateur-opening-preparation-the-evidence. There you will see that the Smith-Morra scores very well on the amateur level, but either of the standard methods for declining the gambit (3... Nf6 and 3... d5) result in white losing all advantage. Of course, IM Silman is correct that this opening is objectively garbage, which is why it is rarely played on the GM level, but it is difficult for amateurs to play against. That is why I would suggest that all but the true theory dogs among amateurs avoid it when playing the Sicilian.

  • 5 years ago

    meniscus

    easy =

  • 5 years ago

    fischerbobyrobertjam

    gg

  • 5 years ago

    Lord-Chaos

    Na4??? why cant black just leave it if its worst to take?

  • 5 years ago

    Poketo

    I have been learning on the Smith-Morra because it keeps my usual gambit lines in full progress (Danish/Goring/Maybe Scotch) and I am going to need to look out for some of those equalizing moves because I am not looking out for the pawn here but blood... (muhahahaha.... whoops got a head of myself again...)

  • 5 years ago

    sputnick

    I would agree with littleAlekhine that the best Morra killer on the amateur level is a simple transposition into a c3 Sicilian. A c3 Sicilian is certainly not what white was looking for when playing the Morra! You might call it a psychological refutation.

  • 5 years ago

    Jpatrick

    After 1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 Black should also consider declining the gambit with 3...e5

    One reason this idea has merit is that the system can also arise from Alapin's line  1.e4 c5 2.c3 e5!? 3.d4 cxd4

    Just like accepting the gambit, I think that a prepared Black player can expect equality at worst and sometimes an edge.

Back to Top

Post your reply: