Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

The Best Games of a Chess Coach: Winning against Kasparov!

Submitted by FM TigerLilov on Fri, 07/17/2009 at 11:44am.

It was July 2007 and I was playing casually some chess at Playchess.com, when, unexpectedly, my game formula matched me to play a game with the handle called Raffael, which was currently the top blitz player in the honorary list. Well-known by all, the mysterious Raffael was actually Gary Kasparov and understandably the whole chat room was full of interested players who often watch his games in search of a good advice or spectacular position. That day, though, they had to get disappointed by their favorite “Raffael” and see him losing dramatically after an opening he was completely dominating. We played a blitz game with a moderately set time control of 4min+1sec, so both of us had to be quite fast and twice more careful. As I said, the opening in this game of mine was not something I would be willing to brag about, as the strongest ever chess player outplayed me indisputably by playing one of his cunning schemes. Yet, in the middlegame I somehow managed to create a surprisingly strong counterplay after I deliberately focused on the weakness in his position. Here I want to mention that every position in chess has its obvious or often not so obvious weaknesses even when it is set up by the strongest chess player in the world, guess this is Garry Kasparov, right? So that was a key point that I managed to realize in the right moment, so my focused plan succeeded bringing a spectacular loss to the Grandmaster in front of his zealous fans. My plan happened to be feasible and subsequently successful due to several key factors and one of them was that I managed to reorganize my pieces, so that they aim at my opponent’s weaknesses in position, while he was both thinking of how to defend them and how to carry on with his own attack. As a result of my successful execution of my first idea – to point out all of Kasparov’s position’s weakness and make him bother about them, after one dubious move of his in the middlegame, I got a magnificent powerful counterplay and expectedly shattered his position without asking for permission.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This game of mine against the strongest player both players and non-players know can only show you that there is no one who is invincible and everyone’s position has a number of weaknesses. This is chess! You just need to keep your weaknesses inconspicuous for your knowledgeable opponents at this high level, while still fighting for your own plan to succeed. I won this game and though it was on the internet, it was real for me and I am proud to share it with all of you who love chess so much.

» posted in Amazing Games
« Previous | 1 2 3 4 | Next »

Comments:

by ike26872 - 5 months ago
Spain
Member Since: Apr 2011
Member Points: 4

Bruce Springsteen juega mejor al ajedrez que el de la partida anterior, mira hasta yo vi el jaque mate a golpe de vista, desprestigiando a los demas otros ganan prestigio, para el tonto que se lo cree claro.

by ike26872 - 5 months ago
Spain
Member Since: Apr 2011
Member Points: 4

En mi modesta opinion, muy modesta, pero gran seguidor de todas las partidas del mejor del mundo, nunca lo vi jugar asi en ninguna jugada, de ilusiones vive el hombre, a lo mejor era el y estaba borracho, o a lo mejor solo se entretenia y probaba nuevas cosas, o quizas se esta haciendo mayor, y cualquiera le gana, un respeto señores por favor, un respeto, a lo mejor cuando se muera yo sere mas grande que el y mejor, pero claro, sientate ante el y no tendras ninguna opcion, mas viniendo los comentarios de donde vienen con un equipo rumano online jugando con computadoras en mi pueblo se dice anda quien no te conozca que te compre.

by R_J_Fischer - 5 months ago
FOREVER Iceland
Member Since: Feb 2011
Member Points: 24

Raffael is it  was really Bobby Fischer! after jan 2008 i played in playchess with him nickname Raffael

by Davidjordan - 12 months ago
Michagen United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 191

haters

by RazaAdeel - 2 years ago
Lahore Pakistan
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 476

Raffael also plays on chess.com, View Raffael . And he is also Garry Kasparov in reality.....JkTongue out

by RoyalStraightFlush - 2 years ago
Jakarta Indonesia
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 641

Wow! Congratz! That's a nice game anyway

by drumdaddy - 2 years ago
International
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 834

You have joined a very prestigious club. Well done!

by gambit156 - 2 years ago
mumbai India
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 702

congrats!

by merchco - 2 years ago
Dublin Ireland
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 2551

I am not so sure that 49 Rd7 forces mate as 49....kh6 and 50 white can not force mate and then black would take whites rook with his queen and checkmate. so while rb2 looks a bad move may be he had no choice.

Fm and Gm s are not in the habit of making up stories

Can someone comment on 49 rd7..kh6 50 ??  Qh3...kg5 and it does not seem that you can force mate from here

by minihag_a - 2 years ago
Chess.com HQ Singapore
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 289

3279 rating??! What system are you using?

by skewer2000 - 2 years ago
Leesburg United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1164

Give FM Lilov a break guys!  He did beat Kasparov in this blitz game.  Why can't you accept that?!

by atomichicken - 2 years ago
United Kingdom
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 1285

I don't think Valeri looks at the comments, so you should message him also with this stuff.

by SukerPuncher333 - 2 years ago
Canada
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 677

49. Rxb2 is puzzling for for several reasons:

1) White could've won immediately with Rd7+ (mate in 3), as mentioned before. Obviously it's surprising for such a strong player to miss this, but understandable if he was extremely short on time.

2) Even if white missed the mate, why not just check black's king? This is instinctive--even patzers would do that. In fact, if you are short on time, you are probably more likely to make checking moves.

3) Rd7+ moves the rook only 2 squares, which saves time. But instead, white decided to drag his rook all the way across the board and play Rxb2? This is also instinctive--blitz players will habitually make "short moves" when down on time.

by Phobetor - 2 years ago
International
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1184

MuzeY you're right; it's absolutely incomprehensible that whoever Raffael is, he missed 49. Rd7+ with mate. It's check for god's sake! Even some FM would know that if you're in trouble in the defense and you got several pieces for the attack, then at least just check! 49. Qe7+ is at least a perpetual, and 49. Rd7+ mates in three. To play 49. Rxb2?? is just ridiculous and against all principles. Whoever Raffael is certainly had an offday, playing 49. Rxb2??

And I agree with psychward, a correction to "Winning against the best blitz player on PlayChess" or something would be better.

by Chessroshi - 2 years ago
Indianapolis United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 739

It is funny to see how many people are unwilling to accept that if it is indeed Mr K that he could lose. Perhaps he, or whoever the great Raffael is, plays for fun once in a while and doesn't play prestine chess 24/7. Sometimes people just goof around online to have fun. It's a nice feat no matter what the identity behind the moniker. Raffael is a beast.

by GlennMaples - 2 years ago
Louisiana United States
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 10

Whoever it was you played, I think you missed a nifty move that leads to mate or winning on move 47.

QXR.  But hard to see in a blitz game

by felixhowes - 2 years ago
london United Kingdom
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 9

i can confirm. it was Bruce Springsteen

by JollyPlayer - 2 years ago
Southern Indiana United States
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 640

Unless you know for a fact it was Kasparov, well, you should not use the name.  Do you know who I really am? Sam I am and I love Green Eggs and Ham.

by dunce - 2 years ago
Iceland
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 1042

Hoity-toity.

by avneet - 2 years ago
Delhi India
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 729

wats with the rating crossing 3000?!

« Previous | 1 2 3 4 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.