Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

The Colle-Koltanowski System

Submitted by chessbibliophile on Sat, 07/11/2009 at 1:17am.

Chessbibliophile (otherwise known as Prof. Nagesh Havanur) is a senior academic and research scholar. He taught English in Mumbai for three decades and has now settled in Bangalore, India. His interests include chess history, biography and opening theory. He has written more than 60 reviews & articles for web sites like Chessville.com and magazines like KARL and Kingpin. He would welcome feedback from readers.
He has already published 8 reviews on chess.com in the last three weeks and will continue to publish more. To see his reviews, keep checking: http://www.chess.com/members/view_content/chessbibliophile

 

Colle-Koltanowski



The Colle-Koltanowski System

by Valerij Bronznik

Schachverlag Kania. 2004

Hard-cover, 223 pages

Published 6/2004
ISBN 3-931192-25-3

 

When Harald Keilhack, the indefatigable publisher, Schachverlag Kania, wrote to me about this book, my first reaction was one of disbelief. Surely, this opening was abandoned after the defeat of Colle himself in the hands of Alekhine. Besides, the whole line,1.d4 d5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3.e3 e6 4.Bd3 c5 5.c3 Nc6 6. Nbd2 Bd6 7.0-0 0-0 showed excessive caution, if not cowardice.One couldn’t help feeling that this was a solid, but passive system.So it was out of sheer curiosity that I asked Keilhack to send me the book. And I must confess that this book has proved me wrong in all respects.First, let us have a look at the game I mentioned.

 

Edgar Colle-AlexanderAlekhine (D04)

San Remo 1930

 

1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 d5 3.e3 Bf5 4.Bd3 e6 5.Bxf5 exf5 6.0–0 Nbd7 7.c4 dxc4 8.Qa4 Bd6 9.Nbd2 0–0 10.Nxc4 Nb6 11.Nxb6 axb6 12.Qc2 Qd7 13.Ne5 Qe6, and Black is better.

 

Indeed, Alekhine went on to outplay Colle in the middlegame and won in 28 moves.White’s error here is 4.Bd3.After the exchange of bishops the Black king would only feel safer. Instead he should play 4.c4 to fight for the control of d5 square and also be ready to punish Black for the early development of his bishop. If Black plays 4c6, it leads to Slav Defence by transposition. But if he plays 4e6, White continues with 5.Qb3 preparing to punish the early development of Black bishop. This variation (Baltic Defence) is rather a speculative line for Black. It should be pointed out that Colle had learned his lesson from this defeat and continued to play his system with success.

What is more important, Alekhine himself adopted this system and beat Flohr in Bern 1932 tournament.Here is the game:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

The Colle-Koltanowski Opening has always been treated as an opening for amateurs, especially, club players.This humble reputation is, indeed, a blessing. It is a solid opening, and you cannot lose. Besides, under its quiet surface there are enough dangers lurking for Black. Take a look at the following example:

 

 

 

 



While the author does caution us about expecting instant results, the book itself is packed with short and swift victories.What is more, he takes a lot of care to explain both the strategic and tactical motifs in this system. Last but not the least, this is a surprise weapon against opponents armed to teeth with theory in regular lines of Queen’s Gambit Declined and Accepted, beginning with 1.d4 d5 2.c4. None of that is going to be of any use against this system.But what to do with customers who avoid this opening as Black. Chapter 5 of the book deals with this issue alone. For example, how does one deal with 1.d4 Nf6 ? The author recommends the Trompowsky Attack with 2.Bg5, a suggestion that I would whole-heartedly endorse.

If you are still sceptical about the whole concept, you only need to take a look at the preview thoughtfully provided by the publisher on his site.

This is one of the best opening books I have read.

 

Links:

http://www.kaniaverlag.de/htm/englisheditions.html

http://www.chess.com/article/view/colle-koltanowski-revisited

http://www.chess.com/article/view/winning-with-the-trompowsky-review

 

 

Recommended

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

 

» posted in Opening Theory
 

Comments:

by dkdusty - 2 years ago
chicago->florida United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 6

This was the first opening I learned past the first three moves and it really gave me confidence against stronger players.  I'll look for this book

by chessbibliophile - 2 years ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2005

 Dear Friends,

Thank you for the feedback.

Perhaps you could have a look at the follow up here:

http://www.chess.com/article/view/colle-koltanowski-revisited

by Mediocris - 2 years ago
Bratislava Slovakia
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 553

I think it's a little bit passive, white can only attack after black decides to open d or e-file.. I like something more aggresive Tongue out

by room42knights - 2 years ago
canmore Canada
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 1

If you check out Colle's games with this opening at chessgames.com, you are in for a treat! Game after game he gives up material for brilliant kingside attacks. It is truly exciting chess in the spirit of Tal. Look it up!

by NM GreenLaser - 2 years ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 2348

idosheepallnight, yes, the Queen's Gambit Declined or Accepted is played more than the Colle.That is why some choose to play something else. One aim of playing the Colle is to avoid what others know or prefer to play. Another aim is to avoid at least some studying of lines that can be avoided.

by idosheepallnight - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 3798

Yah but everyone plays the Qgambit these days.

by NM GreenLaser - 2 years ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 2348

The comment, "If you want to push your book," seems misplaced. The author is Valerij Bronznik. The reviewer is Prof. Nagesh Havanur. The opening itself is fine. As madpawn states, he used it against much stronger opposition with the consideration of the comfort zone of each player. Wilsonia mentions Chigorin players delighting at 3.e3. Delight and comfort zone are related ideas. I am sure some Chigorin players are challenging White's comfort. The choice of openings is part of the shell game (or 3 card monte) of chess. Each player gives information with each move and also withholds information with each move. It is not simply a matter of the best move or "truth," but the psychological struggle. Part of that struggle is internal. A FIDE master, who I have known for many years, used the Colle at a World Open. His positions and results were so good that he was asked for a draw in the last round by a leading grandmaster. He accepted, despite having a good position, since the draw earned him the under 2400 prize.

by Politicalmusic - 2 years ago
Georgia United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 2458

If you want to push your book, saying that you are a professor means nothing.  What are your accomplishments in the chess world?  :-).  Rating doesn't mean you are a good writer or teacher, but it gives at least some playing credibility of understanding.  Especially if you are giving thoughts on particular lines of openings

by OMGdidIrealyjustsact - 2 years ago
England
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 830

I've always considered the colle, in all its forms, to be boring, passionless and defensive, if not downright bad. I note that in all the games black played e6 rather than develop his bishop and I would like to se a game where white wins against Black's extra active piece.

Wilsonia probably has this opening summed up with "many players on the black side give the opening too much respect and play too passively"

by MichielTummers - 2 years ago
Sittard Netherlands
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 118

i used to do this opening frequently.

Now i only use the English/accelerated fianchetto variation though :)

by madpawn - 2 years ago
London England
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 1038

I used this opening many years ago and gained a winning position against a much stronger opponent because he was out of his comfort zone. I occasionally use it now, but the theory has advanced since I first took it up.

Thanks for posting prof.

by bernice - 2 years ago
Baltimore, Maryland United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 117

thanks for the insights

by spudder456 - 2 years ago
Accy England
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 19

I've only ever used this system once on a whim of wishing to try new openings, and it turned out to be a gritty, almost deadlocked game with a slow queen side pawn push eventually turning the game in my favour.  I don't really have the patience for it though.

by king_43 - 2 years ago
Nicosia Cyprus
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 105

Nice opening.

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.