Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

The game of the century

  • orejano
  • | Feb 21, 2008
  • | 31191 views
  • | 49 comments

The "Game of the Century" was played between chessmaster Donald Byrne and 13-year old Bobby Fischer in the Rosenwald Memorial Tournament in New York on October 17, 1956 and was nicknamed by Hans Kmoch ni "Chess Review".

The text of this annotation was written by David A. Wheeler, based on  number of sources (see references, below) and his own study of the game.

Donald Byrne (1930-1976) had already obtained first place in the 1953 US Open Championship, and would represent the United States in three Olympiads (1962, 1964, and 1968).

Robert "Bobby" Fischer (1943-2008) eventually became world champion.

In this game, Fischer (playing black) is amazingly brilliant, with such beautiful play that it was called the "Game of the Century". Byrne (playing white), after a standard opening, makes a minor mistake on move 11, moving the same piece twice (wasting time). Fischer pounces, with strong sacrificial play, culminating in an incredible queen sacrifice on move 17. Byrne captures the queen, but Fischer more than compensates by taking any other pieces.  The ending is an excellent demonstration of pieces working together to achieve a checkmate.

Burgess suggests 3 lessons to be learned from this game, which can summarized as follows:
* In general, don't waste time by moving the same piece twice in an opening; get your other pieces developed first.
* Material sacrifices are likely to be effective if your opponent's king is still in the middle and a central file is open.
* Even at 13, Fischer was a player to be reckoned with.

References:
Burgess, Graham, John Nunn, and John Emms. "The Mammoth Book of The World's Greatest Chess Games." 1998. ISBN 0-7867-0587-6. p. 213-216.
Wade, Robert G. and Kevin J. O'Connell.  "Bobby Fischer's Chess Games". 1972.  ISBN 0-385-08627-X. pp. 110-113 (game 179).
Eade, James. "Chess for Dummies". NY, NY: IDG Books. 1996. ISBN 0-7645-5003-9

This is the game with full annotations 

 


Comments


  • 4 years ago

    figrock

    A game with Fischer rising to power! He demos that he can sac a queen and brilliantly move his remaining pieces to a mate! Amazing Game! Nice post! Cool

  • 4 years ago

    Greychild

    To follow up on the comment by Chuckyxchess, the game played by the two computers in Terminator - the Sarah Conner Chronicals actually was the above game.

    I am white n' nerdy enough that I actually paused the DVD, worked out the position and recognised the game before they mentioned it later on in the episode.

  • 4 years ago

    beaulingpin

    hmm, probably as it would but him in check, so it's an illegal move...
  • 4 years ago

    mattfarter

    fischer must play 32. ... Bd6

    what is the reason why he didn't do this move


  • 4 years ago

    scribbler135

    Amazing.  =)

    A great game by any definition.


  • 4 years ago

    Fellippo

    What else to say..this game is simply brilliant!

  • 4 years ago

    anilkumarnn

    this is too good
  • 4 years ago

    God2

    is thic the competition of master?
  • 4 years ago

    Spike_S

    Please, pardon my ignorance, but how in 13. N...xe4 does B. F. offer up the N.? It looks to me like he simply took advantage of an unprotected pawn, and put his knight in a stronger position. I don't understand what white piece is supposed to "take the offered bait"?  

    Also on move 35. Why does Byrne not move to H2, what is compelling him to run across the board? I have looked at this match many times, and I cannot figure out these two questions. I just want to understand.    


  • 4 years ago

    swordsloop

    There was no intention to offend by this poor analysis of a beginner but I have followed Fisher's games in books and in newspaper diagrams and it is so much more fun to watch a computer simulation.  You really get to see all the tension in the real games with waves of attacks and counter attacks.  I have tried to copy even Fisher's losing games but as you have already noted have not been great at strategy.  I am self confident in the fact that I know I am still learning but will greatly miss not having any more of Mr. Fisher's games to disect and ponder over exactly what he was thinking in all of his brilliant tactics, win or lose.  Peace and good chess, friends.          


  • 4 years ago

    Janoman

    I cannot believe what Swordsloop wrote down...jaja. Great selfconfidence!!!


  • 4 years ago

    bgianis

    A real chess lesson
  • 4 years ago

    orejano

    Only a 1100 rated player can think that fischer made such a mistake....
  • 4 years ago

    swordsloop

    I definitely don't have the experience to comment here nor possess the in-depth strategy but I think Fisher was even greater a player because he lost the queen and still won.  I think he made a mistake and won in spite of his mistake and not that giving up the queen was such a great planned event.  I just don't see that he would not have been stronger if he had not just backed the queen up.  There was a lot of give and take in this struggle to win and he could have done it even better if he had used the queen more effectively.  He won in spite of his mistake and I just don't see that he used this as a really good planned sacrifice.  He didn't gain so much.  He put the white king in check with the rook to take the heat off the queen and I think he was planning something else and it didn't work out but he won in spite of the error.  It doesn't hurt to back up every once in awhile.  Anyway, I'm glad to see that a GM game actually finishes in checkmate and an opponent didn't just resign when they got out of balance in pieces.  Thanks for posting this.  It was a beautiful game, and a really good teaching piece for us beginners.     


  • 4 years ago

    chuckyxchess

    This game was recently mentioned on the TV show "The Sarah Connor Chronicles". One character says to another, "it's Byrne Fischer 1956 all over again" talking about a just concluded game between two super computers in a computer tournment where Black had apparently given up it's queen earlier in the game and the commentator and other characters thought that it was a blunder by black until the denouncement when one of the lead characters make the above mentioned observation. Actually it's a pretty good show many chess tie ins. In fact the computer that loses the above game is called "ThE Turk"


  • 4 years ago

    nerdie

    ........WOW................
  • 4 years ago

    silentfilmstar13

    virgil09,

    It's a good thing you have the rating to back up your comments.  When are you going to put up your coaching profile?


  • 4 years ago

    ingres23

    great game. the young fischer understood the game so deeply. i want to say thanks to The Late Great Bobby Fischer!!!
  • 4 years ago

    grimreaper1973

    incredible game...shows the depth of his brilliance even as a child
  • 4 years ago

    virgil09

    how many games have been won with a queen lose early in the game many i have seen there are sixteen pieces and eight pawns that can be promoted to queen
Back to Top

Post your reply: