The Godfather of Chess: Wilhelm Steinitz (II)

Submitted by GM Julio_Becerra on Wed, 09/02/2009 at 4:05am.

“The Scientist”

In the Vienna 1873 chess tournament Steinitz unveiled a new "positional" style of play which was to become the basis of modern chess! Forget those wild attacks. Prepare a position and follow it through, using the logic of the position itself and not the chimera of a superficial attack. Wait, prepare- and then you must attack when the opponent’s position is shaky. If at that time you do not attack, you will have lost your advantage. Steinitz worked out the concept of strong and weak squares, of good and bad bishops, of strong Pawn structure, of close positions. He once referred to his style as “trigger chess.” It was a style based on a profound feeling for position!

Steinitz’s importance was not just as a player of the game.  He was also a profound thinker and teacher and became the most prolific chess writer of the nineteenth century.

Once again, and again, and again comes to light the same question: Who was the best chess player ever? Very difficult to answer! Epoch! Epoch! Epoch! Steinitz was a sort of Da Vinci, Galileo, Newton, and Einstein. Has there been better than them? I do not think so! To create without previous information is very difficult, believe me!

Today I wish to analyze two games, two true gems of chess! That should be known by everybody: amateurs and professional chess players!

 

» posted in Chess Players
« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Comments:

by gambit156 - 3 months ago
mumbai India
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 271

Now, he becomes my fav GM

by hwatuseke - 4 months ago
Jakarta Indonesia
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 905

Yes Nice game

by killasaurus13 - 4 months ago
Middletown United States
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 1

in the second game, why not take the white rook with the black king or queen?

sorry, but i don't understand :/

by Adrianosky - 4 months ago
Guayaquil Ecuador
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 13

slapshots101 - Because is game over for black, QxR, RxR, RxR, QxR, and in the end QxQ, and white have a free horse, you have to read the comments bellow.

by slapshots101 - 4 months ago
Grand Rapids United States
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 96

someone explain to me the 2nd game... i dont really get it, why not take the rook? why not take the queen with the rook?

by chessoholicalien - 4 months ago
Missouri United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 962

I wonder what made Steinitz suddenly go from being a "Romantic" to a developing a theory based on positional features and play? I wonder if he one day had some kind of dream or vision?

by mjl4871 - 4 months ago
Iowa City United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 90

Enjoythegame asks whether master players try to win when they are a piece down. There are many games where positional/attacking sacrifices will lead players to go down a piece, then win. In the second game here, however, the line you recommend leads to the following position (or one much like it) with white to move:

Is this situation where black seems to have opportunities for counterplay? I see a clear endgame where black has no chance to win, unless white completely falls asleep at the wheel. White must use his next move to move his knight to safety. Then he can move toward the passed d pawn with his king, centralizing in the process. The passed pawn has no chance of queening. The other black pawns are held at bay by their white counterparts, and soon the knight is free to roam and dominate.

(Virax ... I believe Nxh7 is an error, since Ke7 blocks the knight's escape ... followed by Kf7 ... Kg7 ... Kxh7)

by virax - 4 months ago
Kalamazoo United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 62

enjoythegame, I think you meant c8, not d8. I'm pretty sure a knight up with only kings and pawns is a won game for a master. Especially here, where white can take the pawn on h7 after the Queen exchange, and black must choose between saving the isolated d-pawn and winning the knight. 

I am not proficient enough at pawn/king endgames to do analysis on that position, so if someone can prove it's a won endgame, or alternatively find a draw, I would be interested in seeing it. 

by enjoythegame - 4 months ago
Brookland, Arkansas United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2

why doesn't queen take rook, at e7, next move for white is capture blacks rook at d8, and then is captured by black rook at d8. Q takes rook at d8, black queen blocks, white queen takes black queen, leaving white with knight advantage. I've won games at a disadvantage of one piece. Don't the master players try to win when they are a piece down?

by chessbibliophile - 4 months ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 940

This is an account of what happened at the end of the second game:

http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/extra/steinitzvonbardeleben.html

Hastings 1895 was one ofthe greatest tournaments. It was won by Pillsbury ahead of Tschigorin,Lasker,Tarrasch and Steiniz. Here is an image gallery:

http://www.chessville.com/misc/History/Hastings1895.htm

You can download games of the tournament from the following page:

http://www.chessville.com/downloads/ebooks.htm

There are also volumes of British Chess Magazine, 1892 and 1903 on the same page. In those days chess periodicals were enjoyable. There are also books of tournaments in which Steinitz participated.

All the books are in the public domain, and it is legal.

Enjoy!

by chemperor - 4 months ago
manchester United Kingdom
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 1

guys, @ virax pls forgive me im trying to figure it out in the second game,after move  22, what bout Qxe7? after the rook check.. pls anyone explain thx a lot...

by _ishan_ - 4 months ago
Los Angeles United States
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 74

If 22... Kxe7 then 23. Re1+ and the King must move to d8 or d6 or the queen hangs. If 23... Kd6 then 24. Re6 Kc7 (Kc5 then b4+ Kb5 a4+ Kxa4 Ra6+ bxa6 Qxd7+) 25. Qf4+ Kd8 (forced) 26. Qxf6+ Kc7 27. Qf4+ 28. Kd8 Rd6 and white pins the queen to the king, protects the c1 mate threat, his kingiht is no longer hanging ad if Rc1+ Qxc1 Qxd6 hoping to simply trade rooks Nf7+ forks the king and queen. If 23... Kd8 then Ne6 and the king is forced to move in the e-file (or he can give up his queen via Qxe6) and then Nc5+ wins the queen

by virax - 4 months ago
Kalamazoo United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 62

amitprabhale: 22... Kxe7 Re1+ 23. Kd8 Ne6+ 

From this position the queen is lost without compensation; the only way out of check for the black king is to sacrifice his queen with Qxe6, or play e7 or e8, which both lose the queen to Nc5+.

by Gary_Seven - 4 months ago
Columbia United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 750

The constant attack,that was  one of Steinitz's secrets. Is there a Wilhelm Stenitz II?

by amitprabhale - 4 months ago
Mumbai India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 322

hey being an average playr i cudn undrstnd da 2nd game after move #22. Why didn Black play Kxe7???????? Pls explain

by king_43 - 4 months ago
Nicosia Cyprus
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 91

the first game is an amazing positional game , the second one is an (immortal game)

by kerver73 - 4 months ago
Thessaloniki Greece
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 1227

unbelievable play!!

thanks for the games!!

by nevin - 4 months ago
Tucson, Arizona United States
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 70

yeehaw!

by Don3 - 4 months ago
Rourkela India
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 138

YES YES YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by emilyjoieofstpaul - 4 months ago
Las Pinas City Philippines
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 66

I am the 2nd

« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.