Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

The immortal game

Submitted by A-Jenery on Sat, 09/29/2007 at 11:07am.

 

Apologies if the following game is mentioned in chess.com already.
------------ 
This is about one of the most famous chess games, the titanic dual between Adolf Anderssen (playing white) and Lionel Kieseritzky in 1851.  It was aptly coined the immortal game, due to brilliant sacrificial but attacking play. Anderssen forces checkmate at move 23.   Perhaps there was a double-meaning here?  After all, chess itself can be said to be an immortal game - it has been played for centuries, and will probably be played for all time...
 
Adolf Anderssen was one of the strongest players of his time and was considered by many to be the world champion after winning the 1851 London tournament.  Lionel Kieseritzky lived in France much of his life, where he gave chess lessons, and played games for five francs an hour at the Café de la Regence in Paris.  Kieseritzky was well known for being able to beat lesser players despite handicapping himself — by playing without his queen, for example.
Played between the two great players at the Simpson's-in-the-Strand Divan in London, the immortal game was an informal one played during a break in a formal tournament. Kieseritzky was very impressed when the game was over, and telegraphed the moves of the game to his Parisian chess club. The French chess magazine La Regence published the game in July 1851.
 

 


» posted in Amazing Games
 

Comments:

by figrock - 3 years ago
United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 1438

Brilliant game..! One should learn these moves for show and tell. However, black's 18th move should be Qxa1+, to put the king in check first. White King moves. Then move 19. Bxg1 for free. White answers by pushing pawn to stop Queen's retreat protection of King.

by guitar_man_03 - 4 years ago
Tegucigalpa Honduras
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 259
great game, wonderful sacrifice of the queen to play the checkmate. simply great.
by JediMaster - 4 years ago
Brookings SD United States
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 471

This is a case for not resiging when your down several powerful pieces.  You can still win if you do not lose focus and still attack.   Sometimes your opponent will think they are in control and relax their concentration allowing you to win.


by A-Jenery - 4 years ago
England Great Britain
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 251
Yes it's a good one, and blows my mind as well...   It's as though Anderssen knew what Kieseritzky was going to do almost from the start to know that he could afford to sacrifice the two rooks.

by spokebloke - 4 years ago
United States
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 49
Maybe someone should post Kasparov's "immortal" game.  Some interesting sacs in that one...
by Rauros - 4 years ago
Toronto, ON Canada
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 64
that just blows my mind
by chewybac5 - 4 years ago
Buffalo, NY United States
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 247

Well good to see you finally got this game posted, and yes it certainly is a good one!


 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.