Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

The KID Bayonet Attack by GM Arun & GM Magesh Part 1

  • GM arunabi
  • | Apr 23, 2009
  • | 9661 views
  • | 25 comments

This week we will study The King's Indian Defense (KID) Bayonet Attack. This sharp and dynamic opening was regularly employed by some of the World Champions like Bobby Fischer, Garry Kasparov, Mikhail Tal and Tigran Petrosian. They introduced exceptional ideas from time to time and believed in its resourcefulness.

Bayonet as an Anti-King's Indian Defence

KID has continued to be one of the popular choices against the queen pawn opening. Many systems like the Classical System, Bayonet Attack, Samisch, Petrosian System, and Avebakh System are the main weapons that put the KID to the test.
Of all the systems, The Bayonet has been the most direct and principled approach to taming the KID. Elite Players like Kramnik, Anand, Bareev, and Van Wely have used this system time and again as their main weapon to counter the KID.

With the popularity of the Bayonet attack growing day by day, white was able to outplay black comfortably at the highest level and the very survival of the King's Indian was under threat. But thanks to the efforts of Teimour Radjabov the Azeri Grandmaster, the system itself was reborn and took new dimensions for the future developments.

Van Wely vs Radjabov

To study the recent developments of the KID Bayonet Attack we have decided to study some recent encounters between Van Wely and Radjabov. Both the players being well prepared and confident in their systems have contributed a lot for this opening, and studying these encounters will give a deeper understanding of the opening.

 



The Bayonet Attack. A rather straightforward approach from white here. White's idea is to expand on the queenside and he does not delay even a bit in executing his idea. White also understands the essence of time just like in the Sicilian Najdorf. He needs to advance his queenside pawns to begin the attack before Black starts his assault on the kingside. 







Now that we have seen how Van Wely has outclassed his opponent, we have to give the young Radjabov his chance before we can come to any conclusion right?







Let us take a look at the final game now where Van Wely tries to improve on the second game, but it did not make much of a difference in the result. Radjabov comes up with some sharp play to pin his opponent down yet another time.







We hope that you have gained enough understanding in the KID Bayonet Attack in particular the positions where white gives up his knight on e6 for black's light-squared bishop. If you think you have seen enough of Van Wely and Rajdabov, we cannot wait to tell you that there is more to their encounters and we will continue to study them next week to keep enhancing our ideas in this opening.
At this point we would also like to give a suggestion to our readers. We encourage you all strongly to not just see the games but also try out the openings you are interested in in friendly or practice games. The best way to learn some of these ideas is when we face those difficulties and try to solve them in real time, in other words, experience is an amazing teacher in itself.

Comments


  • 3 years ago

    chessbibliophile

    There are two important points:

    1)After 13.c5, Black plays h6! (not 13...dxc5? 14.bxc5 h6 15.Nh3!)14. Ne6 Bxe6 15.dxe6 d5 16.exd5 Nfxd5 17.Nxd5 Qxd5 18.Qb3 Qxb3 19.axb3 Nc6 20.Ra4 Rfe8 21.Bc4 Nd4 with a strong plus. It is for this reason that 13.c5 is not advisable.

    2)The critical line is 13.Ne6 Bxe6 14.dxe6 Nh5 15.g3 Bf6 16.exf5 Nxf5 17.g4 e4 18.Nxe4 Bxa1 19.Bg5 Bd4+ 20.Kh1 Qe8 21.e7 Nxe7

    ( If 21...Rf7 22.gxf5 Be5 fails to 23.f4 Nxf4 24.Bxf4 Bxf4 25.f6 Be5 26.Rf1±)

    22.Qxd4+ Ng7 23.b5 Ng8 24.Bd2 Qf7 25.Bc3 h6 26.f4 Rae8 27.Rf1 Nf6 28. Bf3 Nd7 29.Ng3

    (In the game Ivan Cheparinov- Teimour Radjabov, M-Tel Masters 2008 White played 29.g5? and Black obtained counterplay after 29…Kh7 30. Bg4 h5!)

    29...Kh7

    (If 29...b6? 30.Bd5 Qe7 31. Qd3 Kh7 32.Be4 Qf7 33.f5 )

    30. Bxb7 ( 30.f5!? is also possible.)Ne6 31. Qd2 and White dominates the position.

     

  • 3 years ago

    pawnkeeper

    In the Dec. 3rd 2005 game it shows black 30.....Nd7 but I see that if black takes 30.....Kxb he wins. What do you think? 

  • 3 years ago

    anuj_manerikar

    bald game

  • 3 years ago

    moki920

    very nice - good comenty and explanations KID is my first choice agains d4 and i lerned now some new thinks. Thanks

  • 3 years ago

    lijielina22

    extraordinary

  • 3 years ago

    chesteroz

    Thanks. Very instuctive. Radjabov very resourceful! Interested in white improvements.

  • 3 years ago

    pastoryoshi

    Fischer's statement is "1. e4  best by test" obviously he had to regularly test it against something else in order to compare whether or not it is best, therefore 1.d4 is a main thing to employ in order to compare it and test it. he also sometimes played 1.c4 and once in a very rare while 1.e3 or 1.Nc3 or 1.Nf3. Fischer though claiming "1.e4 best by test!" never claimed to be dedicated to using only 1.e4

  • 3 years ago

    Elroch

    Fascinating!

  • 3 years ago

    Benefactor

    I like more the Larsen variation of the KID.

  • 3 years ago

    Jpatrick

    There are many ways to handle the white side of a King's Indian, and it's really a matter of taste. I tend to favor the Petrosian system, but if Black is going to let me gain time by putting his Knight on c6 then I will go into this.

  • 3 years ago

    Skakmati

    Very helpful but why is this called the Bayonet Attack?

  • 3 years ago

    vishvak

    nice opening thanks for the aritcle / well i have my own comments for white , middle game and end game white gave plenty of chances to black recover from mere losing game,........... at the time of real time chess its one who think fearlesely will win , white gave plenty of rooms to black back in the game .

    let me conclude that waiting game of white cost his game ,.

  • 3 years ago

    Mickey07

    This is another of my favourite openings (as well as the dragon) thanks. I think i have benefited from both.

  • 3 years ago

    WScott336

    Another very instructive article.  Thank you.

  • 3 years ago

    IM dpruess

    Spiffe,

    i believe they meant that kasparov, fischer, petrosian, and tal played the kid (as black). a few lines later they give a list of player who play the bayonet from the white side: kramnik, anand, bareev, van wely.

  • 3 years ago

    davutuysal

    Great article about Kings-Indian. Thanks a lot!

  • 3 years ago

    beginner_sm

    awesome comeback by radjabov. am watching his other cool games too. they are nicely played to disappoint giants like kasparov, anand and ponomariov.

    thanks for the insights.

  • 3 years ago

    ksep

    an instructive one!!

  • 3 years ago

    lubo

    Very nice article. I love the suggestion!

  • 3 years ago

    Spiffe

    How did a dedicated e4 player (Fischer) "regularly" employ the Bayonet Attack?

Back to Top

Post your reply: