The Magnus Smith Trap

Submitted by Pyke on Tue, 06/16/2009 at 12:56am.

If you're like me, you don't read much opening theory. You play Chess, enjoy it, but don't know many of the nuanced trap lines that have been developed over the years. You probably, like me up until this evening, have never even heard of the Magnus Smith Trap. So what is it?


Simply put, the Magnus Smith Trap is a sequence of moves, shown below, that is found in the Sicilian Defence. It's named after a three-time Canadian Chess champion, Magnus Smith (1869-1934). The trap occurs in the Sozin Variation of the Sicilian, and begins with the moves:



1. e4 c5
2. Nf3 d6
3. d4 cxd4
4. Nxd4 Nf6
5. Nc3 Nc6
6. Bc4



Up till now, things seem to be going pretty well for Black. If Black is a player like me, who is fond of fianchettoing the Bishop, the next logical move would appear to be 6. ... g6. Let's consider this position for a second:



You might be thinking, "Hey wait a second! Why not just take the pawn?". The answer is simple, taking the pawn is disasterous for Black. The line follows like this:

After 8. ... dxe5, 9. Bxf7+!... the King's only option is to take the Bishop. And that leads to the loss of the Queen after 9. ... Kxf7, 10. Qxd8.... Black might as well resign at this point.

The problem for Black, there aren't any really good lines here. For example, consider the alternative; Nh5 leads itself to g4!, which forces Black to play the misreable Ng7... Black is really cramped. 

  Even more alarmingly, after Qf3 e6, Ne5 Qa5+, Bd7 Qxe6, Bc6 .... Black's queen is lost. It all seemed so sensible too at the time. Black really doesn't want to play Nh5. That leaves the moves Nd2 or Ng5; both of which pose their own problems. After h3, Ng5 is forced to retreat, probably to the awkward Nh4 position, protected only by the over-extended bishop; while Ng2 opens the door for an ugly pawn center.

This trap creates many dangerous lines for White, and Black should avoid it. There's a couple ways to do this. First, the trap cannot be sprung so long as Black maintains the Knight on c6. It's not possible to always keep the Knight, but it's a useful thing to keep in mind when (or if) you lose the Knight. Second, if you DO lose the Knight on c6, realize that Nf6 is asking for trouble. The most obvious way to prevent this trap, is actually simply play e6, instead of Nf6. This prevents the Bxf7 line, which is really, the main danger of the trap. The other obvious thing is, be aware of the fact that the Queen can be trapped if you play the appealing, but hopeless, Qa5+.

Perhaps the most interesting thing about the trap: You can transpose to situations where you can play it in other Sicilian variations. The fundamental keys to this trap being present:
Black having played: Nf6 and d6; while missing the Knight on c6 and not having moved the Queen or King.
White having played: Nxc6 at some point (or the Nc6 never having been played), Bc4 and e4 being played.

Now you've heard of it. :).

» posted in Opening Theory
 

Comments:

by Evasan - 5 months ago
Johannesburg South Africa
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 133
by DemonicSoldier - 5 months ago
Bratislava Slovakia
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 453

Good article, thanks

by ExMachina - 5 months ago
Nashville, TN United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 32

Here's how 8...d5 played out in one game...

 

by Pyke - 5 months ago
Toronto Canada
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 206

Just to recap:

If 8. ... d5, I suggested:
9. exf6 dxc4
10. Qxd8 Kxd8
11. fxe7 Bxe7
12. O-O ***********GreenLaser's, aptly pointed out that 12. Bf4 is better, because it opens up the opportunity for O-O-O+. I agree whole heartedly. I don't think d5 is the best move for Black, this position.

If 8. ... Nd7, I suggested:
9. Qf3 *********But, as GreenLaser points out, the easy capture of Nxe5 leads to a stupid an ugly situation for White. I totally ignored the Knight move. Sigh. The same problem would occur of course with Ng4, so I don't know what I was thinking :).

In any case, I agree that e6 is a solid response to both moves (Ng4 and Nd7).

-Pyke

by NM GreenLaser - 5 months ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1449

In Pyke's comment to ExMachina: Diagram 1, instead of 5.0-0, 5.Bf4 with the idea of 0-0-0+ is stronger. In Diagram 2, 2.e6 is better because after 2.Qf3?, instead of e6, Black has Nxe5. In Diagram 3, 2.Qf3? is answered not by Be6?, but Nxe5. Instead of 2.Qf3?, White has 2.e6 threatening Qxg4, and if 2...Ne5 3.exf7+ Nxf7 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.Qf3+ with the idea of Qxc6.

by ExMachina - 5 months ago
Nashville, TN United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 32

thanks for addressing the two moves i mentioned.

i still don't see that 8...d5 leads to an immediate (or even clear) win for white

and with 8...Ng4 9 Qf3 black could play 9...Nxe5, protecting f7 and forking the hanging bishop and hanging queen

by Pyke - 5 months ago
Toronto Canada
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 206

PaladinisBack192:

More then you'd think. The accelerated dragon players often play d6 and a combination of g7. e6 is a very strange development move if you're an advocate of that form of Sicilian. The obvious thing is to be aware of the exposed weakness of that d6 pawn; in combination with the possibility of a Bishop check to remove the guardians from the Queen.

You're right that it might not come up in a long game; against master level opponents, but the first proponents of the trap were GMs against other GMs, so there's some merit as a surprise weapon. Further, in Blitz games, it's always a dangerous threat where the players are looking to gain material over other things.

The point, of knowing such traps, is in my mind more the awareness of them to avoid them, and the opportunity to spring them if your opponent makes an error. I also found knowing this trap lead to me seeing how, in Smith-Morra lines, White could create similar threats. The fundamental idea is exploiting that weak pawn and lack of the Knight on c6, thus forcing Black to play e6 to avoid the trap. Remember too, Black often plays d6 for precisely the reason of preventing e5, so they may not be attuned to the danger here.

-=-=-

ExMachina:

(Author's Edit: GreenLaser raises some good points about Diagram 1 and 2. His comments: In Pyke's comment to ExMachina: Diagram 1, instead of 5.0-0, 5.Bf4 with the idea of 0-0-0+ is stronger. In Diagram 2, 2.e6 is better because after 2.Qf3?, instead of e6, Black has Nxe5. In Diagram 3, 2.Qf3? is answered not by Be6?, but Nxe5. Instead of 2.Qf3?, White has 2.e6 threatening Qxg4, and if 2...Ne5 3.exf7+ Nxf7 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.Qf3+ with the idea of Qxc6.)

8. ... d5 seems like a losing proposition in response to e5. Consider this line:





























Consider Nd7:






























And finally, Ng4:

by PaladinIsBack192 - 5 months ago
Canada
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 133

seems like an ok trap but who on earth would fall for that????

by ExMachina - 5 months ago
Nashville, TN United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 32

what about 8...d5 or 8...Ng4

neither option is super for black but they're not horrible either.

either is preferable to the alternatives given here i think.

by bigfundu - 5 months ago
Chennai India
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 386

he he he .. am waiting for a scape goat now :)

by king_43 - 5 months ago
Nicosia Cyprus
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 90

nice trap

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.