Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

The Najdorf: An Uncomfortable Twist

  • MikeRoesell
  • | Aug 11, 2009
  • | 2419 views
  • | 11 comments

I think that there is no one on Chess.com that can disagree that I like the Sicilian defense.  From my articles I think that one is not on a Sicilian. This is because the Sicilian is what I know best.  I am a Najdorf player, following the example of Bobby Fischer and Garry Kasparov.  As such I enjoy playing against the Najdorf and that is because I have a special weapon. I learned this from one of my classmates.  He suggested that when I play against the Najdorf I should try this line to set up the game, following the main line for the Najdorf.  1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bc4.

I later found out that this is a common move that many great GM’s including Bobby Fischer have played with success. With subsequent research I want to do share what I have found with the chess players of Chess.com. The main response to the move 6.Bc4 is 6...e6.  One main move is 7.0-0 but I would suggest 7.Bb3 b5. The old way for handling this position as white is to play the Queen to f3 then to castle short. I would like to promote a different way for playing this position.  I would suggest that 8.Bg5 would work well for white.  This idea makes sense and is definitely documented, for example, the Poisoned Pawn Variation of the Najdorf.  Here is what I would suggest and promote.

         Well you may ask does 9...Qb6 do any better than Qc7. The answer that I would give is no.  And here is my reasoning.
          Does this line refute the Najdorf? NO!!! And am I glad for that because of all the time that I have invested to learn the theory of the Najdorf.  Does this line make things somewhat uncomfortable for a Najdorf player? Yep.  If your opponent doesn't know the line they will probably make a mistake and if you keep the pressure they are almost sure to slip unless they know the whole line. Thanks for the read and feel free to leave me feed back on this article and mistakes that I may have made.  Smile

Comments


  • 2 years ago

    shelled

    An alternate line I've played in my games... Instead of 7. ...b5

  • 3 years ago

    MikeRoesell

    I don't think that you are missing anything This is a GM game from somewhere that I found during my research.  I didn't write the players down and now I couldn't remember them.  I would disagree with your first choice of Bc5 however for the previous reason that I gave.

    As for Be5 I would need to look at it to figure out where White would go.
  • 3 years ago

    kzary

    Don't really like the 12...h6 move for black in the first game.  Seems a waste of a move to get rid of a pointless bishop.   I'd rather play 12...Be5 (was originally thinking Bc5 for a pin but the knight doesnt have good moves anyways and Be5 can keep king from kingside castling).  I think this keeps the pressure on rather than promote a trade that will let the opponent get rid of a useless piece while hurting your pawn structure for no reason.

    Am I missing something with 12...h6?

  • 3 years ago

    gsorita

    thanks for the idea

  • 3 years ago

    CreedDisket

    actually sicial defence is a good opening for defence and for the attact. yah i agree that most of the GM used that kind of opening in order to win the game. thanks for saying the sicilian defence is a really great move even in the beginner like me. that kind of opening can lead me to victury.

  • 3 years ago

    gxtmf1

    Oh yeah, the funny thing is that Kasparov, in his book Kasparov vs. Karpov (analyzing the first two World Championship matches between the two and all annotated games preceding them) Kasparov talks about how he always thought of himself as being very similar to Fischer in how he played to win, yet he had to compromise this nature to "survive" the first match between Karpov and himself. Later, he writes about how he used the Sicilian in "must-win" circumstances because it gave him the most fighting chance (unlike, for example, the Petroff Defense). I believe Karpov played a4 to prevent the move b5. 

  • 3 years ago

    gxtmf1

    The opening you showed in the first diagram is a great one and I can tell that you follow the example of Kasparov. Funny thing about it is that, despite 5...a6, the opening can be called a Scheveningen variation because of the pawn structure with e6. I don't really want to get into a debate over what it "really" is name-wise, all I know is that Kasparov likes it a lot and it combines the best of each.

  • 3 years ago

    MikeRoesell

    Hmmm. Is this what you mean.

  • 3 years ago

    spinningrearkick

    12...Bc5 favors black in the database do you have a different twist?

  • 3 years ago

    Puzzlemania

    Interesting opening theory and analyses. The most important thing shoulda be learned of this is that black needs to change his move sequence. For one thing I would have played Nd7 more early in this type of variation. And btw even E5 comes up.

    If black addapts his move sequence hereafter white should do the same. So there for the following diagram in this same charistic njadorf variation is what I play.

  • 3 years ago

    flirtyking

    Thanks for the lines,I also play the najdorf alot.This was very informative, Thanks!!

Back to Top

Post your reply: