The Open File - Knight or Bishop?

Submitted by NM Zug on Sun, 08/10/2008 at 12:23pm.

The Open File

by Life Master Mike Petersen (Zug)

Knight or Bishop?

Well, I promised, so now it’s time to deliver.  It’s time to answer the age-old question: which is the better piece, the bishop or the knight?  There have been numerous tomes written on the subject, but none of them have, in my opinion, attacked the real heart of the question.  All they do is tell about the relative strengths and weaknesses of the knight or bishop in various positions.  The question of which is the better piece depends upon much more than that.

For one thing, did you ever take the time to observe how players line up their pieces at the beginning of the game?  Which do they spend the most time over, the knights or the bishops?  Right.  You see, everybody has their own ideas about which way the knight should be facing.  Some, like me, think that the knights should begin the game facing the king.  Others feel that both knights should face the same direction, either to the right or to the left.  Then there are those who are aggressively minded and point their knights directly at the opposing army.  On the other hand, who has ever seen anyone arrange his bishops with any particular care?  How many of us really care which way that stupid little slit in the bishop's head faces?  Do you?

Then there is the matter of how one picks up the pieces.  Lifting a knight takes some thought, you know.  Do you pick it up with your thumb and forefinger, or do you use your index and middle fingers to lift it?  This latter method, by the way, is used most often by those who face their knights toward the enemy position at the beginning of the game.  Now look at the bishop.  Everybody just grabs.  No thought required here!  Pick it up and put it down.  Whoopee.  Let me tell you, moving a knight is an act of love for some of us.  No other piece seems to fit so well in our fingers.

Also, take a close look at all the pieces.  Which piece do you think takes the most effort to make?  Right again.  Why, advertisements for chess sets are always claiming that the knights are "beautifully hand carved", but mention nothing at all about the bishops.  That's because they're all turned out on lathes like all the other pieces on the board.  I've never seen a set advertised with the comment "beautifully hand carved bishops", have you?  Obviously, then, more work goes into making the knight than any other piece on the board.  There must be a reason.

Another thing.  When someone is in time trouble, the piece they dread the most is...that’s right ...the knight!  The worst thing that can befall someone the exchange ahead is the dreaded knight fork coming out of nowhere!  Ugh, it's happened to me, and it's no fun.  No sir.

So, when you get right down to it, there really is no contest.  The question of which is the better piece doesn't even have to be asked.  Now, if they could only learn to spell it without all those silent letters...

==========================

Click here for links to Mike's other work on Chess.com

» posted in Other
 

Comments:

by jchurch5566 - 5 months ago
Ohio United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 2078

Hi gang,

I think we have finally (after decades of thought) put this question to rest.  Kudos to Mr. Peterson.  Well done.

Watch your backrank.

by oinquarki - 5 months ago
The Finest City In The United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 3429

I care about the little slit on the top of the bishop....

by figrock - 7 months ago
United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 1438

Cute article..!

by ILEARNEDAT7 - 14 months ago
vancouver bc Canada
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 119

very amuzing,and very true.The dreaded knight fork,a game ender for me on many occasions.i cant remember ever having to fear being  spooned by a bishop.Wink

by NM Zug - 14 months ago
Central Florida United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 747

Thanks for everyone's comments.  Very entertaining!

Please bear in mind that "The Open File" is really a humorous look at the world of chess.  Because chess can be taken so seriously, I believe that a look at the lighter side is always in order.  "The Open File" is the result, a somewhat curmudgeonly look at our wonderful game.  I hope you continue to enjoy reading it as much as I enjoy writing it.

Thanks, Mike (Zug)

by JosephS - 14 months ago
Doncaster United Kingdom
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 8

In games like this, an amazing doublecheck is executed perfectly, with a bishop AND a knight - so when they work together, its great.

 

 

 

As I said before, you cant compare them.

by JosephS - 14 months ago
Doncaster United Kingdom
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 8

Like your article - made me laugh and i totally agree with u,


                                                        BUT,


You cant really compare them - they each do a different job. But excellent article. Smile

by Redspecial - 14 months ago
Leeds United Kingdom
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 153

I'm glad to hear you've never fallen off a bishop Enoch, but I'd keep that information quiet if I were you!!

 

Good article Zug, you made me realise that, yes, I do subconsciously point my knights to face the king every single time, whereas half the time, my bishops see more intent on watching the TV than the battle! 

by Enoch-Elijah - 14 months ago
BC, Canada Canada
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 92

I never liked horsies that much, I once fell off one and aquired a concussion but

I have never fell off a Bishop.  ps: knighty-Knight 

by CookDrew - 14 months ago
Alabama United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 41

I might prefer "Cavalier..."

Knights are the most fun and fearsome to play and play against.

Well, that and a merciless queen.

Talk about hell hath no fury...

Bishops are great and all, but a knight is an attack piece AND a defense piece- I've had my lines threatened enough by them to know better- they hold mine better now and capture wayward attackers and lonely defenders. The knight does as it should- being an example of a mounted warrior, it cuts throught the lines, menaces queens with impunity every chance it gets, and above all the Knight's Fork- where the choice must come- which piece is given up as slain and which might be saved still?- as neither may have the power to attack the knight to save itself or its fellow lest another choice be made.

I think my most brutal win of late was off an underestimated knight (of course Horsey was supported by the silly hat bishop & a cornered queen).

I take the whole valor aspect to heart with the knight- sure the Bishops are worth a bit less to me (approximately their worthy 3 points), but Knights aren't so much worth less (still 3 points...) but they are the daring, the loyal, the defenders...and avengers.

I would jump a queen with a knight any day and consider it a good one.

I'm glad I didn't stick with "horsey."

by NotKasparov - 14 months ago
Wilmington (near Philadelphia) United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 344

I pick up all my pieces the same way on live chess, but I spend more time on the queen, since a mis-click with a queen has an excellent chance of being a legal (yet terrible!) move.

Could that possibly mean that the queen is the most powerful piece???????????????

The mystery deepens... 

by menofsticks - 14 months ago
Canada
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 177

Funny article :)  I disagree with the bit about the Little Horsie Guy being the most feared, though.  For me, missing a pawn move is almost always my biggest problem, and therefore my greatest dread.  In fact, just earlier today ...

/me shakes fist at nimbus

by NM Zug - 14 months ago
Central Florida United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 747

To revolting:

Liam, where is your sense of humor? My column is entirely tongue in cheek.

Regards, Mike (Zug)

by revolting - 14 months ago
liverpool, ENG Great Britain
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 52

this is a ridogulous thread. the reason people repeatadly state that the supremacy of the pieces depends on the board and the position of the pieces is because that is true. and the slit in the bishop's head is not stupid.

by NM ozzie_c_cobblepot - 14 months ago
United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 3590

Yes, the horsie has that endgame flair. If the opponent has a bishop, sometimes you can just put your pieces on the opposite color, and then you can just move, never worrrying about stalemate! The opposing bishop is actually a detraction, in a sense.

by NM Zug - 14 months ago
Central Florida United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 747

Or even the German "der springer".

But I like "cute little horsey" the best.

Innocent

by jreyes33 - 14 months ago
Quito Ecuador
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 123

agreed! The knight has so many features, although not all of them are directly related to the chess game, that it makes no sense asking if a bishop is "better" than the knight.

Oh, and if you don't like it's name in English because of the silent letters, try calling it by the Spanish (caballo) or Portuguese (cavalo) name. BTW, both words mean "horse", not "knight".

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.