Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

The Tale of g2-g4? & g2-g4!

  • GM Gserper
  • | Jan 20, 2013
  • | 18916 views
  • | 35 comments

One of the major strategic rules of chess is "Keep your King safe!". It is precisely due to this rule that a very common pin from many openings which start with 1. e4 e5 is especially dangerous. For example this one:

We've all had a similar experience during our chess beginnings. The result of the pin is very painful for Black.  Due to the unavoidable capture of the Nf6, Black's kingside structure is going to be ruined. But what should you do if your Knight is pinned--how can you break the pin? One common way to do it is to push the 'h' and 'g' pawns (h3 followed by g4 for White and h6 followed by g5 for Black).  Most inexperienced chess players do exactly that and as a result their King gets exposed.  Talk about a medicine being worse than the illness. The next classical game is a good example of what happens in this case:


Chess coaches (me included!) warn their students about the consequences of such a weakening of your own kingside.  But let's see what hapenned in another classical game:

And one more classical game:

But wait, there is more! 

So, what's going on here? Did Capablanca refute the rule of keeping the King safe, or are these games a major exception?  Or maybe it is the situation described by the Latin phrase: "Quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi" ? Actually, the explanation is very simple.  In all of Capablanca's games his King was very safe and by pushing the 'g' pawn in front of his King he achieved a big strategical advantage in all of his games. In two of them his opponent's Bishop was entombed and in the game against Marshall it was actually a signal for an attack against his opponent's King. So, the g2-g4 move is not better or worse than any other chess move, but if played in a wrong situation, then the consequences of your mistake will be magnified by the weakness of your King.  

My advice is: playable, but proceed with extreme caution!

Comments


  • 3 years ago

    Estragon

    Great article, thanks!

    Of another case of Capablanca apparently ignoring established principles, Edward Lasker said, "Capablanca doesn't follow rules, he makes the rules!"

  • 3 years ago

    lovechess4U

    This is a awesome collection But I consider this as an ideal situation ...hats off

  • 3 years ago

    sayusan

    Tongue Out

  • 3 years ago

    sayusan

    hi

  • 3 years ago

    alantal

    Very nice, thank you. i think it would be fair to say that these players have enough mastery of the game to do such pawn pushes, or maybe they had done it so much it was normal to defend if anything goes wrong, after all, we're not classical players, we don't commit ourself to certain chains of those "rules" despite what tarrasch thought, we shouldn't be dogmatic.

  • 3 years ago

    TheMagicianPaul

    Thanks for the article, whenever I push g4 it turns out to be a 99% ?? move..

  • 3 years ago

    pattrik

    What in the postion indicates that pushing g2-g4 is actually completely safe (like Capablanca)?

    Nice article, thanks :)

  • 3 years ago

    sollevy10

    good stuff. nice!

  • 3 years ago

    MLPH

    I think this was pitched a bit below my level, but very good examples for the point made and I do love Capablanca games.

  • 3 years ago

    Vulnerable_King

    Second

  • 3 years ago

    shahrokh1975

    thanks!Smile

Back to Top

Post your reply: