^ Click here to remove ads! ^

Treasure Chess - A Review

Submitted by billwall on Sat, 03/22/2008 at 6:01pm.

When an author, under the Acknowledgment section writes, "For a book like Treasure Chess it is not easy to cite where all my references and impressions came from, so I'm not even going to try," I became intuitively doubtful that this new publication would offer anything new, especially considering the false idea that chess is the "World's Oldest Game."

 
Page 21 Pandolfini writes, "Surprisingly, strong players do not necessarily possess greater recollecting skills, as evince in Dutch psychologist Adrian De Groot's seminal paper in 1938...(Which seminal paper is that? Bruce doesn't mention it but it was
Thought and Choice in Chess. 1938? Wrong date too. In 1946 he wrote his thesis Het denken van den schaker, which in 1965 was translated to English and published as Thought and choice in chess. Source: Wikipedia.com Bruce probably meant to write, "1978" referring to the 2nd edition (June 1978) Publisher: Mouton De Gruyter Source: Amazon.com)

 
Page 66 he writes, "In 1846
Stanley wrote, 'Thirty-one Games at Chess...Also in 1946, he founded American Chess Magazine...'"

 
Page 67 Morphy's dates are written twice correctly as (1837-1884) but on page 20 it reads, "'Checkers is for tramps.' - Paul Morphy, American Chess Master (1836-84)" and page 96 it reads, "(1843-87)

 
Page 73 he spells Saemisch as "Samisch"

 
On page 236, Pandolfini writes, "According to Professor Steven Garrard, (the correct spelling is Gerrard, L.T) the Blackwell published books of Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951) have at least 181 references to chess and its cognates (chessboard, for example) Chess is not mentioned in the Tractatus (the
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus Wittgenstein's seminal 1922 treatise analyzing modern logica and metaphysics through language), but here's what the profound "Witt" says about certain chessic fine points in The Blue Book, a set of notes compiled in 1933-34 by his Cambridge students having to do with Wittgenstein's special way of thinking.
 
"We distinguish in chess between good and bad moves, and we call it a mistake if we expose the queen to a bishop. But it is no mistake to promote a pawn to a king."
 
I think he was on to something."
 
Did Pandolfini research Wittgenstein on his own or did he happen to read the following articles, which were put together in April/May right before the publication of
Treasure Chess (Publisher: Random House Puzzles & Games October 30, 2007, Source: Amazon.com)
 
http://sbchess.sinfree.net/Wittgenstein.html and http://sbchess.sinfree.net/Chess-and-ChessProblems.html
 
 
It's one thing to combine references and place them online for the better good of research, but to place it in a book as mere "trivia", pawn it off as your own, and then write, "For a book like Treasure Chess it is not easy to cite where all my references and impressions came from, so I'm not even going to try," is very pathetic.
 
On the very next page (237) he goes on to cite Leo Tolstoy's famous work,
War and Peace, with the title, "War and Piece"
 
On Chess and Psyche, page 209 Pandolfini writes,"Norman Reider a psychoanalytic interpretation to chess in his 1959 paper,
Chess, Oedpius, and the Master Dolorosa. It 'crystallizes within its elaborate structure the family romance, is replete with symbolism and has rich potentialities for granting satisfactions and for the sublimation of drives.'"
 
He also mentions Freud and Herbstmann but do the following sites seem similar?:
 
http://www.goddesschess.com/chessays/normanreider.html and http://sbchess.sinfree.net/Psychoanalysis.html

 

Page 265 it reads, in regards to Fischer's patented chess clock, "Devised and patented by Fischer in 1989..." Actually, it was filed in 1988 and issued in 1989, therefore it must have been devised earlier. One only needs to observe the patent below:

http://www.google.com/patents?id=LSY7AAAAEBAJ&dq=bobby+fischer

Patent number: 4884255

Filing date: Aug 5, 1988

Issue date: Nov 28, 1989

Inventor: Robert J. Fischer 

U.S. Classification

368/96

International Classification

G04F 300
 
 
"Never judge a book by it's cover," seems highly overrated and we can attest this during our observation of Treasure Chess. (VIII) Preface Pandolfini writes, "Treasure Chess is my collection of the fascinating trivia, inside tips, stories, and anecdotes that I've been collecting over the years." I'm sure it's a nice collection.

 

Avital Pilpel couldn't have stated it any better when he wrote, "Utter trash."

 

 

Lawrence Totaro (reprinted by permission)



» posted in Other
 

Comments:

by Knightly - 11 days ago
Wisconsin United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 395
I rather enjoyed it.
by batgirl - 47 days ago
NC United States
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 2541

Mr. Totaro also sent me this passage from p. 96 of "Treasure Chess" by Bruce Pandolfini -

 

                                

 

The obvious error is that Morphy was born in 1837 and died in 1884, a glaring factual error in a book of facts.

 

And for the record, the opera being staged was "Il barbiere di Siviglia" by Gioacchino Rossini. That he seemed to be guessing doesn't (or at least shouldn't) give the reader much confidence in his care for details. Additionally, it wasn't even at the Paris Opera; it was at the Italian Opera, or more specifically, Le Théâtre-Italien, located in Paris.

 

sheesh....

 

see Of Morphy and Music for more details.

 

 


by batgirl - 49 days ago
NC United States
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 2541

Mr. Totaro pointed out Panolfini's book to me and sent me a facimile of pp.264-65 which contained not only the Fischer Clock reference but also the one below:

 

                                 

This garbage speaks volumes.

 

For a person to have a book published, he must have name recognition, an obvious talent, a good track-record or extensive credentials in the field about which he is writing - in short, a reputation.

When someone pens a book, he is committing himself irrevokable to scrutiny now and forever.

 

Some folks are true craftmen who do know their stuff and take care to ensure that their work is impeccable.  The product of their work becomes gems, even classics.  Some people see nothing but dollar signs, and cash in on their reputation with lazy, shoddy workmanship for a quick paycheck.

 

Pandolfini is a sell-out who did chess a tremendous disservice. 

 

End of story.

 


by billwall - 49 days ago
Palm Bay, FL United States
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 1817
I just ordered the book, so no opinion yet.  Just finished up Evans book The Crazy World of Chess.  Batgirl has an opinion on Pandolfini's book.  I do respect Totaro's work and research.
by benws - 49 days ago
United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 882
hmmm....so what is your opinion on this, bill?
by RN9 - 49 days ago
Toronto, Ontario Canada
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 135
I just happened to have recently bought this book.  I would have to agree with you that there alot of mistakes and false information found in the book.  I did enjoy it though as it did have some interesting information that I didn't know.
by SonofPearl - 50 days ago
Wales
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 2160

I haven't seen the book, so I can't comment on it directly, but I've seen enough shoddily researched and edited chess books to not be surprised.

 

Typos are unfortunate, but we should look to the editor to pick these up.  Not attempting to name sources and simply recycling old and incorrect information is more than unfortunate - it tends to suggest that a book is more of a copy and paste job than a labour of love.

 

Sounds like chess history buff Edward Winter would have a field day on this book!  Thanks for the warning...


 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.