Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

"Abusively" Good Chess Kids!

Now before you get all hot and bothered about the title of my blog,  know that this story is about the abuse I took from not one, but multiple children (that weren't even my own Tongue out). I am talking about all the amazing youth players I played at the 2012 Chicago Open! If you still have your "undies in a bunch" after reading my story about these little monsters, then that's a you problem - not a me problem... and there's nothing I can do for you Cry.

It took me a little while to finish this blog, but since I wasn't "reporting" on the news or results of the tournamnet, I figured you would all want me to take my time and annotate my games, etc. Simply put, the Chicago Open was not my best tournament. But it wasn't my worst either. After taking roughly a week to reflect and review my games, I've come to two startling realizations about my overall experience in the Windy City (one good, and one really, really scary Sealed...)

First, the good news: I didn't play that badly! Even though my score wasn't what I wanted (5.5 out of 9), and I got there by playing lower rated players most of the event -- if you take away a couple really bad (really horrible Yell) decisions I made, the truth is I didn't perform as poorly as I first thought.

At my best moments, I executed some really nice ideas! I also kept my composure despite a rough start, and finished with a couple really nice wins. So, was I a tad frustrated with myself? Yes, I was. But am I depressed about my play or the general direction of my chess? No. 

So what's the bad/scary news? Part of the reason for my poor score was not my play, but rather the incredible play from all the kids I faced! These kids are scary good in fact!! Before you accuse me of making excuses, I know, I know: The thing that makes chess different than any other sport is that you and you alone are always to blame for a loss.

There are no teammates to point fingers at and noone to "pass the buck" to in any respectable way. I haven't forgotten that, I know I need to look in the mirror whenever anything goes wrong (blah, blah), and I also know that in my best form I would still have a lot to "teach" these youngsters Wink... 

But man, the kids I played were awesome! They played at such a high level and I came away extremely impressed... and a little frightened. My results before the games:

  • Loss: NM (2201 FIDE) Justus Williams 13 years old, Round 3
  • Win: NM (2200 USCF) Sarah Chiang 15 years old, Round 4
  • Loss: NM (2305 USCF) Sean Vibbert 15 years old, Round 6
  • Win: FM (2100 USCF) Awonder Liang (pictured above) 9 years old, Round 7
  • Win: FM (2394 USCF) Jeffrey Xiong 11 years old, Round 9

Let's go through my games one at a time against these top juniors starting with my first game/loss (against Justus Williams). I made two terrible decisions this tournament, and the first was on move #52 against the young New Yorker...

 



Don't get me wrong, Justus played fantastic throughout the majority of this game and deserved to win. He outplayed me in my "wheel-house opening" (the English Attack) and and showed no fear! But once he let me back into the game with his blunder on move 47, why didn't I just take the draw? I wanted to win when I had no right to! I showed no discipline, and played into a forced loss... You can't let your emotions get the best of you Yell! Great work Danny Tongue out!!

My game against the "Talented Texan" (Sarah Chiang) helped me to bounce back a little, because even though I was worse most the game, I held on, defended as black, and eventually seized my moment to win. I predict that Sarah will be one of the top female players in this country very soon:

 

 

 

Moving on, after struggling to get a draw against a much weaker player in round 5 (shows you how well I was playing Cry) I made my "worst chess decision" of the year to date... You can see my comments to the game against the young Sean Vibbert, but know that I am not taking anything away from him, it was simply a bad game all around for me, starting with an unnecessarily bad opening choice:

 



 

Unfortunately, it was out of the frying pan and into the fire! After that loss, I didn't want anything to do with these kids for the rest of the event -- so naturally I got paired with the "Super Talent", 8 year old (just turned 9 apparently???) Awonder Liang.

 



Is it wrong that it took me 6 hours and ALL OF MY EFFORT to beat this 3 and 1/2 foot munchkin??? Tongue out Man, I was pumped after finding a way to pull out that game, and completely frightened as to the potential of this "wonder" kid...

After finding my form and playing really well in round 8, I was paired with arguably the most talented and scariest of any kid in the field (maybe outside of Chess.com's own Kayden Troff, who I thankfully missed Wink on his way to earning an IM-Norm). Young Jeffrey had already taken down my Chess.com Partner (IM David Pruess) earlier in the tournament, so I was not taking this one lightly:

 



Thank heavens (and my knowledge of Najdorf opening theory Laughing)! 

In summary, I played 5 of America's top juniors and barely managed a plus score. I'm not sure I have anything wise to say at the end of this blog, but that's what happened...

See you around!

Comments


  • 4 months ago

    GoodGoodChess

    I am 13 years old...LOL

  • 8 months ago

    SebLeb0228

    i am 11 years old 

  • 11 months ago

    SherlockHolmes94

    I once lost to a 7 years old asian kid T__T

  • 11 months ago

    thought_control

    Us average amateur chess players should not be discouraged by this.  These kids are one of a kind, probably less than 1% of other children their age become this good.  They have excellent family and financial support, high level coaching, a lot of time (no job to hold) and, well, like I said, one of a kind; and that is why they are at the Chicago Open!!  I believe that an average player like myself will reach at least Master level, it just takes determination and a proper study method.  Just because some kids might be better than you are doesn't mean you have to stop your own personal growth.  

  • 11 months ago

    IM ACEChess

    After further thought, I decided to update the title of this blog to something a little less "controversial"...

    In any case, I hope everyone understands the ironic humor I was trying to create originally, and no one took offense Wink...

    Thanks to those who enjoyed the read...

    Danny

  • 11 months ago

    thought_control

    Wow, very humbling indeed.  An eight year old playing at a strength I can only dream of!  

  • 11 months ago

    sorouush

    hes cute.and he openings is good

  • 11 months ago

    kingspasski

    Amazing! Nice blog! :)

  • 11 months ago

    Killachessguy

    So refreshing to see a titled player making no excuses for his losses, be it against talented children or not :).

    Plus i like your tournament tales, so keep posting Daniel :).

    Looks like Awonder Liang could be a real star of the near future given his extremely young age.

    And i hope nobody takes this the wrong way, or thinks i'm being racist or xenophobic or anything else ridiculous, but most these top young kids playing today have Oriental names, so maybe there's going to be some sort of power shift in the near future, from the Europeans (especially Eastern Europe) to the young aspiring Nakamura's of this world??

    All the best guys :)

  • 11 months ago

    Caliphigia

    @RedTanager: Idealy, kids should be kept in a barell and fed through the hole, but some parents are too soft.

    @radbidpenguin & Paprika: don't you guys recognise irony when you see it?

    @ Daniel: It seems to me that you made one basic mistake when playing with the kids: you allowed them to play sicilian defence, and that is every kid's favorite oppening (and the one they know best). Playing something else, say English oppening, would take them from familiar grounds into a deep black forest and their confidence would be much less. 

  • 11 months ago

    cabrego

    Wow those are the kinds of kids that will make you wake up in a cold sweat at night!  I am glad you survived ! Great games!!

  • 11 months ago

    davidmelbourne

    @EminanceGrise: I have joined you. 

  • 11 months ago

    Petrosianic

    You played a remarkable number of kids.  I can't seem to play against anyone other than kids these days myself, the way the pairings work, or the chess clubs I attend. :-) An interesting variant on the 10...a5 idea would have been to play 6...Nc6 and then Pe5 and if later 0-0-0 then Pa5 and so you have the Pa5 line with Nc6 and Bc8 inserted. Then Qe1 is not quite as effective with no Be6.  Also the line with Na5-c6-xe7, it will be difficult to play practically w/o knowing the exact follow-ups, Black has excellent initiative, for instance against Awonder I thought Nd7 instead of xf4 may be more sensible after Bd3.  If you really want to avoid the crazy main draw line maybe try the normal knight retreat followed by kb1 instead of f4 or imm. after giving your knight the c1 square those positions I find interesting.  h3 against justus, rlly danny? :P  Their knowledge of opening theory was outstanding, that's how it is when u play 1 e4 especially.  The position with BQ and Qpassers v RQ, easier to play as White, have had it before :-).  your game against vibbert reminded me most distinctly of a very poor live sessions game against you danny in which i was black, i hope i did not inspire you [with the early na5, xb3, and the ugly Pe5]. Innocent interesting english attack danny. Wink  as it was i couldn't make chicago, hopefully will c u at a tourney sometime.  when i'm playing well i'll be inclined to travel more. Cool

  • 11 months ago

    SwanGambit23

    Man, seriously those kiddo's are hard to beat. way different 10 years ago Lol.

  • 11 months ago

    PHI33

    *reads article*

    *gives up on life, promptly quits chess*

  • 11 months ago

    NM smalugu

    You can read about my loss against a kid here - http://blog.chess.com/smalugu/a-tough-loose

  • 11 months ago

    sorouush

    good openings

  • 11 months ago

    mobidi

    Very interesting and nice games,and VERY INSTRUCTIVEEmbarassed of course ,we all remember what said Bobby about Yugoslav attack,where KMS wins vs GM-just open h file...Wink,But don't "cry" for it "Argentina"-You give very GOOD LESSON to your young partner-he will remember it ALL his life (i know it...).Chess is THE GAME -where we don't know WHO is professor and who is studentFoot in mouth and this are very good "NEWS".Good Luck ! Students and Professors,Professors and students!

  • 11 months ago

    IM ACEChess

    I know you were there Greg!

  • 11 months ago

    gregterry

    Danny, I also played at the Chicago Open and had my encounters with the "young ones" as well.  Some good, . . . some bad.  Overall it is was a great time!

Back to Top

Post your reply: